why it hasn t been handed over. this saua has why it hasn t been handed over. this saga has been why it hasn t been handed over. ti 3 saga has been rumbling on why it hasn t been handed over. ti 2 saga has been rumbling on for some weeks now, we know borisjohnson switched off his mobile phone in may 2051 because of security currents after it emerged that the phone number had been listed online for some 15 years. he did what was told by security officials. over the last few weeks or so, it has been in the hands of security officials within the government, they have got it from borisjohnson lawyers. they are saying they can access it at the moment, they can t get the messages off. as you say, we also know now that boris johnson off. as you say, we also know now that borisjohnson has forgotten his passcode, which might be one of the potential issues here in terms of them getting it off. borisjohnson s spokesperson said he wants to cooperate fully with the inquiry. he has alrea
why it hasn t been handed over. this saua has why it hasn t been handed over. this saga has been why it hasn t been handed over. ti 3 saga has been rumbling on why it hasn t been handed over. ti 2 saga has been rumbling on for some weeks now, we know borisjohnson switched off his mobile phone in may 2051 because of security currents after it emerged that the phone number had been listed online for some 15 years. he did what was told by security officials. over the last few weeks or so, it has been in the hands of security officials within the government, they have got it from borisjohnson lawyers. they are saying they can access it at the moment, they can t get the messages off. as you say, we also know now that boris johnson off. as you say, we also know now that borisjohnson has forgotten his passcode, which might be one of the potential issues here in terms of them getting it off. borisjohnson s spokesperson said he wants to cooperate fully with the inquiry. he has already handed
officials, is taking away someone up security clearance the same thing as taking away their free speech? know. it is important to keep in mind what is being taken away. in order to have security clearance, the right to access classified information is not a constitutional right. it is a privilege and it rests in the hands of the president. the president decides who gets access and who doesn t. it doesn t prevent mister brennan or anyone else on this hypothetical list of people who might have their clearance revoked from speaking their mind. people worry it is a form of retaliation. if you have security clearance it makes you more valuable in washington, you can work on classified project into losing his financial time. i don t think the court ever upheld a case where someone has said my losing security currents because of an illegitimate is a violation of my free-speech rights. cases from the 50s and 60s where people say you can t deny me