anonymously, it makes it feel acceptable to slander someone or encourage violence against someone because there s really no barriers there. because you have people going around and start pulling triggers, that s the problem. there s no distinguishing reality in real life. there is an argument that if you create an outlet for that, then you reduce the reality of it happening on the street. if the internet was around in the 80s or 70s, mark chapman would ve been harassing from a faraway. i want to go back to the security question. there was a story today about a tennessee home owner who can t those two inmates who killed the prison guards. he held them with a gun, these
anonymously, it makes it feel acceptable to slander someone or encourage violence against someone because there s really no barriers there. because you have people going around and start pulling triggers, that s the problem. there s no distinguishing reality in real life. there is an argument that if you create an outlet for that, then you reduce the reality of it happening on the street. if the internet was around in the 80s or 70s, mark chapman would ve been harassing from a faraway. i want to go back to the security question. there was a story today about a tennessee home owner who can t those two inmates who killed the prison guards. he held them with a gun, these
it anonymously and there s a million of you and your trafficking the same kind of bile, it makes it feel acceptable to slander someone or encourage violence against someone because there s really no barriers there. when you get out into the real world and start pulling triggers, that s the problem. there is no division between reality and real life and stuff on the internet. there is an argument for the fact that if you create an outlet for that, then you reduce the reality of it happening on the streets. if t the internet was around in the o 80s, in the 70s, with john lennon be alive because mark david chapman would ve been harassing him from far away rather than trapping him? we don t know that. it s a hypothetical. i want to go back to the security question. there is a story today about a tennessee home owner who caught those two inmates who killed those prison guards. he held them pretty he was a citizen with the gun pretty held both of these incredibly dangerous murderers on the
where did you learn how to build a bomb? where did you get your ingredie ingredients? the investigation is focusing on determining the totality of the circumstances as you just described with the ultimate goal to identify and protect the citizens of the united kingdom. and maybe even more broadly throughout europe. understand that the intelligence services now are working so collaboratively, because the threat is a threat globally to all of us. the radical extremists are looking to target innocent civilians to raise their level of visibility and to promote their cause. and that spreads throughout europe to the united states and elsewhere. so these intelligence services are working so closely, anything that any allied service is finding, they are all working together. they ve got their people on the telephone, they re on the computer networks searching for any information that might help the brits solve this. and ultimately help to make the world a safer place. one more security que
that new trend taking over facebook could be a huge security risk. have you seen where they have people list their favorite concert list and they post nine that are real and one that is fake. this is information that hackers would love to know. concert information is sometimes a security question that hackers would love to know. before you make make that post, you might want to think twice. thanks for watching. it is monday, may 1st. while you were sleeping, lawmakers sealing a deal on a $1 trillion spending bill to keep the government running. but what about the border wall?