Page 90 - Security Risks News Today

We democrats are equally serious. we do not want immigration as a wedge issue. much father, we want a bipartisan bill that solves the problem and becomes law. we recognize that in order to pass bipartisan legislation, none of us can get everything we want. thats why our frame work says we can address the status of people living here illegally while at the same time securing our borders and creating an immigration enforcement statement that ensures that we will not again confront another 11 milli...

We democrats are equally serious. we do not want immigration as a wedge issue. much rather we want a bipartisan bill that solves the problem and becomes law. we recognize that in order to pass bipartisan legislation none of us can get everything we want. thats why our framework says we can address the status of people living here illegally while at the same time securing our borders and creating an immigration enforcement system that ensures we will not again confront another 11 million people c...

The capitol that protect us, which were very grateful for and we pay for. it does cost money. to me i was not disappointed to hear the co-chair say, quote, congress must do its part to meet this challenge and provide necessary resources to the state department to address security risks and meet mission imperatives. frankly i think its a no-brainer. the fact that we would even have a problem with it, to me, doesnt make any sense. i hope we can work together to get the resources that we need for s...

Including ambassador chris stevens who had done so much to liberate the libyan people. despite the risk involved, he returned to that country as our ambassador because he knew the important work of building a new libya remained unfinished. americas diplomatic corps knowingly put themselves in danger to help the country. we must do more to spoerpt our diplomats. i am pleased you have stated you will accept every one of the 29 review boards recommendations. the state department is increasingly ope...

Having an official presence in a given location versus the security risks faced by that diplomatic mission? how do you think the department will weigh the personnel and costs opposed to the gains of operating in front line states. and what changes do you think these demands will require? vis-a-vis people and other resources at the state department. >> those are very important questions and i cant do justice to them in the time left. but well get you additional written information. let me briefly...

Embassy security or police on the beat or military personnel or police here at the capitol that protect us, which were very grateful for and we pay for. it does cost money. so to me, i was not disappointed to hear the co-chair say, quote, congress must do its part to meet this challenge and provide necessary resources to the state department to address security risks and meet mission imperatives. i think its a no brainer. and the fact we would even have a problem with it, to me, doesnt make any ...

Farewell, theyll miss it. theyre not happy about me leaving. >> clayton: i think your son did a ceremonial spilling of orange juice. >> juliet: lets get to some headlines now. another scathing report reloosed overnight on the benghazi terrorist attack. the senate homeland security committee strongly criticizing the state department for failing to recognize and respond to security risks before the attack. the report also faults the pentagon and the white house. it criticizes the obama administrat...

Jon: a brand-new report on the benghazi terror attack on the bipartisan congressional investigation is not only critical of the state department for failing to recognize and respond to security risks before four americans, including our ambassador to libya were killed. the report also finds fault with the pentagon and the white house. chief intelligence correspondent catherine herridge live with that from washington. is this report different from the one that the state department investigation g...

Unanswered questions. >> chris: she has never really answered quids. >> four dead americans and the secretary of state has refused to answer questions at a full-blown press conference or get herself to capitol hill. 2016 politics are coming into play early on this and i think people are not going to forget this. the question is are the people around the world safe today? are they? what about the criminal investigation into the people responsible? why did the fbi take several weeks to get on to t...

Unanswered questions. >> chris: she has never really answered quids. >> four dead americans and the secretary of state has refused to answer questions at a full-blown press conference or get herself to capitol hill. 2016 politics are coming into play early on this and i think people are not going to forget this. the question is are the people around the world safe today? are they? what about the criminal investigation into the people responsible? why did the fbi take several weeks to get on to t...