including lethal force. my god, can we not make determinations about who is here in the country and who is a threat, who is not? the law hasn t changed. we re setting priorities. you bring up a very valid point. there s going to take some time to ramp up to hire what is 15,000 agents. it takes nearly a year for a regular police officer to answer calls on his or her own. so it s going to take four, six, eight, 12 months for this really to get on its legs and start to walk and to run. the reality here is we re uncuffing. the president has, very clearly, said this, you re uncuffing the law and order people. the ice immigration officers, the border patrol. what happened, illegals would come across, and they were given an nta, a notice to appear to show up to court 30-plus days later, 90, 95% would never show up. let me bring in julia. how do you see this? i don t know how you can say
dance. that has cost a lot of u.s. jobs and it also means 6 million u.s. jobs that rely on that trade but what does it do in our partnership with mexico on that front? what does it do to the war on drugs and our partnership with mexico on that front. if you enrage the mexican government that hurts you in other areas. we ve had a president that branded his opposition during the campaign and branded his defense secretary. we now have tylenol trump if you re a national security guy. you got priorities you have to think about. the iran nuclear deal. china, russia, what are we talking about? the berlin wall on the border and the president should be setting priorities. president bush with missile defense years ago and many transitions to terrorism. and we have a problem here of prioritization. one other problem in terms of flipping government on its head,
at negotiations. we don t use them, joe, we use people that are soft and weak and frankly stupid and incompetent. who better to ask about the whole ceo phenomenon than one of those people trump named. former ceo of ge, jack welsh. joins me from las vegas. jack, if he asks, will you serve as treasury secretary? no. why not? michael, i have got a wonderful life. i m doing my thing. i m out in vegas talking to groups. i ve got my school. i ve got a lot of things on my plate. and i don t want a full-time job. does the ceo skill set transfer, do you think, to the white house? well, parts of it do, clearly. i mean, there s no clear that leadership, making decisions, setting priorities, differentiating between priorities. absolutely would it translate.
well, parts of it do, clearly. i meaner there s no clear that leadership, making decisions, setting priorities, differentiating between priorities. absolutely would it translate. now, some of the give and take. some of the negotiating skills, that would depend on the person. your tenure at ge was legendary. a 1981 to 2001 reign. the stock value increased e4000 if i m not mistaken. do you think that jack welch could have gone from ge, from 30 rock to pennsylvania avenue? i probably wouldn t have made it. that s trump s curse, right? could i have done the job? absolutely. would i have the skills? absolutely. could i be elegislated, would i
together. it underlines that income equality, having a dream for all, not just the billionaires that citizens united has been able to own the process, that s going to be the big deal. i think that was a major issue before and now s a bigger issue. why aren t we reinvesting in cities instead of giving billionaires tax cuts? yeah. it s more than that. a lot of investment has been placed in these cities. i know in our administration we worked to try to tried to work closely with prince george s and baltimore city on a number of initiatives that address education address small business. i spearheaded small business reform in our state. the problem is the system resists the change that s necessary to move forward. this isn t just about throwing dollars at the problem. this is about setting priorities, having the community behind it, and more importantly, having the political leadership and will to implement it. that s what s missing. where does that begin? to both of you, where does