a chilling report reveals how far the far-right extremist group infiltrated a gop establishment in florida. what are the broader implications for our democracy? i will discuss this with my panel? this is all coming up and more right now. . a good saturday morning to you. i am katie fang. the mayor garland s department of justice seemingly lending to former white house officials off the hook this is when it comes to the january six investigation. frankly, at the timing cannot be worse. department officials announced late yesterday that no criminal commit contempt of charges will be late for mark meadows or dennis could veto. we are awaiting comment from them. this happened hours after former trump advisor peter navarro was arrested and charged for contempt of congress, for denying the committee documents and a deposition. navarro vows to fight the charges. what is the difference here? right now, we do not know. it is not just the media or the public want these answers. i
filings that the january six committee has basically accused the former president and his inner circle of violating federal rules, like defrauding the united states and they want to present a case like a prosecutor might to the american people. they want to say this is how we reached this conclusion. the committee has a trove of evidence. they have from militia groups who have turned over signal chats, they have all of the documents, a records, communications from mark meadows, the content of which a framed of this investigation. when you present all of this to the american people in a really focused a setting where questioning is being led by committee counsel, members are not ground standing, witnesses have been carefully selected to give, or show, the story of january 6th, it is going to
Security is vital in the computerized age, and unexpectedly, it's likewise nearly non-existent. In any case, with regards to things like private photographs, or email insurance, protecting your information's significant. Along these lines, your messages are one of the most private sorts of information on your iPhone and you wouldn't need any other person to gain admittance to them.
execution of an act of government. what took so long is evidence of agreement. the text messages, the signal chats, the phone messages and so on to indicate that people agreed together to stop government. now, again, the last time the justice department tried to bring charges like this was 2010 or 2011 in michigan. they got tossed out by the judge for a lot of things i m talking about here. it is actually quite hard to establish this kind of agreement. so the justice department, it appears, waited until they had a lot of evidence that built up and have what appears to be a pretty strong case. andrew, it wasn t just talking about a quote i m quoting now a massive live bloody revolution. they were training in paramilitary combat tactics, staged outside d.c. according to the charges and all the evidence presented so far. they showed up with tactical
one from arizona, one from north carolina, and one from florida to be here in washington. again, gives this impression, at least according to prosecutors, that this was a paramilitary operation, that this wasn t just a spontaneous riot by a group of people who were upset about the president s or being driven on by the president s rhetoric on the speech that day. that these guys, as you just read those signal chats from mid-december, it s prosecutors are saying that these guys had organized themselves in a way that they were able to take advantage of the size of the crowd, which overwhelmed the capitol police. one of the other things we learned and it gives it a sense that perhaps they have some cooperation from some of the moebz of the oath keepers, i believe that s already been made public before, but that s how they can build a charge like