press these articles. he said that the press were hostile or have been hostite press were hostile or have been hostile to press were hostile or have been hostile to him since birth. there is a lot hostile to him since birth. there is a lot of hostile to him since birth. there is a lot of detail coming out of court thick a lot of detail coming out of court thick and a lot of detail coming out of court thick and fast. he is now getting on to how thick and fast. he is now getting on to how he thick and fast. he is now getting on to how he suspected that his phone was being to how he suspected that his phone was being hacked. i quote from the statement, was being hacked. i quote from the statement, this is really at the centre statement, this is really at the centre of statement, this is really at the centre of this case, the allegation by prince centre of this case, the allegation by prince harry of unlawful means being by prince harry of unlawful means being used
fight it out. melissa, how strong is the case that trump willfully just to find the justice department subpoena here? we don t know the scope of the evidence that jack smith has here. we know snippets of things, basically putting together a lot of these pieces, but it does seem pretty clear here based on the fact that evan corcoran is taking these notes surreptitiously that he at least understood that perhaps he was not being given correct information, or at least accurate information about what was being responsive to the subpoena. so that is really material here, given the fact that a big part of the case that we think jack smith is trying to make against the former president really turns a lot on his intent. did he know that he was keeping these documents willfully, and unlawfully? and that s a big part of what is going on here. so i think that is a huge part of this case. i always say with republicans, certainly this
pronunciation. thank you for that. i studied italian a little bit. very good. unfortunately, i cannot tell you much about the story, as you mentioned, it s been serialized, it will be coming out in two or three paged snippets at a time to keep people interested. probably, to me, certainly, the most important thing about this story is the circumstances under which came to be. we created this zoom group of friends who, i think, for the most part, had not really met before covid, i certainly have not met anybody before my book came out. and we started a knitting group, we met via zoom. i guess it s a way to make sure that we stayed in better touch. somebody came up with the idea of writing a script for a hallmark movie. i had never seen a hallmark movie, i thought, why not? eventually, over time, we decided to do a novel. i wrote a lot of fiction when i was younger.
driving, and that has been transcribed and given to the grand jury. it sounds like it was so detailed it s beyond lawyers notes and into see why a notes. and that is another red flag. that he knows he s dealing with somebody who is not being straight with him. and so, the federal judge has pierce the attorney client relationship, he has those notes, and now we know what else is happening in his crazy legal team is that parlatore has quit and he is accusing this boris guy of obstructing basically accusing him of obstructing, getting the information from bedminster. so this is a bunch of some kind of beetles in a bottle together, and we are going to watch them fight it out. melissa, how strong is the case that trump willfully just fight defied the justice department subpoena here? we don t know the scope of the evidence that jack smith has here. we know snippets of things,
of beetles in a bottle together, and we will watch them fight it out. melissa, how strong is the case that trump willfully defied the justice department s subpoena here? again, we do not know the scope of the evidence that jack smith has over here. we know snippets of things, basically putting together a lot of these pieces. but it does seem pretty clear here based on the fact that evan corcoran is taking these notes surreptitiously, that he at least understood that he was not being given correct, or at least accurate information about what was being responsive to the subpoena. so that is really material here given that the big part of the case we think jack smith is trying to make against the former president really turns a lot on his intent. did he know that he was keeping these documents willfully, and unlawfully? that is a big part of what is going on here. i think that s a huge part of this case. carlos, i always say with republicans, certainly the