Latest Breaking News On - Somebody powerful - Page 1 : vimarsana.com

i worry he gets bogged down in build back better and other legislative initiatives and goals and this and that. i think he needs to step up into the global sense of what is going on and explain it to the american people. david ignatius, i've heard from some insiders that he is being advised, go big or go home. >> so it is part of joe biden's story that people have underestimated him in every campaign, and he is going to have to find that gear that he has tonight where he becomes somebody powerful. as i have watched him over the years, there's something joe biden does better than almost any politician, which is to empathize with people who are suffering. >> yes. >> people who have suffered loss the way he did when he lost his first wife and his children, when he lost his son. and when he goes into that gear and reaches out and expresses the human emotion that we feel

mothers save have 3000 signatures against this legislation cold gun kingpin legislation cold gun kingpin legislation to stop these illegal guns from coming in and from the south, i — 95. nobody was talking about this but i have been fighting it a long time. the difference is, money or not, somebody powerful is really speaking loudly. it or not, somebody powerful is really speaking loudly.- really speaking loudly. it has been picked _ really speaking loudly. it has been picked up. _ really speaking loudly. it has been picked up. it— really speaking loudly. it has been picked up. it has- really speaking loudly. it has been picked up. it has beenl been picked up. it has been picked up as an important political issue. can i ask you, jackie, some of the money available is also to go to the sort of people who would then take some of the heat away from the police in terms of dealing with difficult situations where perhaps you do not need the police their market of. ijust wonder, do you have any sense of conflict between those who have called a lot over the last yearfor have called a lot over the last year for the funding of the

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20180731:21:30:00

this country. i think you would agree. i don't think we are better off after eight years of that. i was somebody who actually really did believe in 2008 that the good that would come out of -- i didn't support him and wouldn't have voted for him but the good that could have come out of it would've been some amelioration of that. >> juan: day now, kim kardashian has worked with the president and gotten a woman, alice johnson, released from prison. she was there on a low-level drug crime. >> dana: as jesse pointed out, it wasn't that low level. did she deserve this clemency? i think so. jimmy kimmel said there's other people on the list, like matthew charles, who was wrongly imprisoned. that case is before the justice department. hopefully we'll get some attention. i think she has the right idea witches if you've been an issue and you want somebody powerful to help you solve it, you can

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20171229:06:05:00

come to understand can be seen as a triangle with three points. authoritarianism. you highlighted the quotes that are worrying on that front. the second is his desire to make as much money as he can out of the presidency. and the third and the one that may be we have not paid enough attention to is psychic neediness. that was on display in the interview. the need to present himself as somebody powerful. people need to come to me and his responsive to flattery and the comments about the president of china. how big a smile is on the president of xi tonight and thinking the show on the tarmac, what dividends paid off in manipulating the president's ego. >> ambassador sherman, you can build on the point david makes. and this is an interview with so much in it, one point when asked willing to make deals, he says, yes. the reporter follows up and says you would move to the center on some of these issues.

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20120802:04:36:00

this fear that we were going to be attacked by somebody powerful. that led to military spending that i think in some cases was excessive. the soviet union collapses in 1990, and first george h.w. bush and bill clinton begive to reduce the military because there was no longer this existential threat to our citizens, and then dick cheney and the other neocons persuade george bush they can use the threat of terrorism as the functional political equivalent of communism. the terrorists are terrible people, and i am very pleased that we are fighting against them, but they're not hitler, and they're not stalin. they don't threaten our existence as a country. they're threatening our lives. we have to fight them back, but that threat was blown up beyond the reality. so we got back into excessive military spending, including the two wars. i think what's happened finally is the american people understand there is no power in if world that comes remotely

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20120802:08:35:00

i guess assuming times have changed enough to make this less risky. do you think times have changed enough? >> i do, and you're exactly right. it is historic, and frankly, the timeline is beyond that. remember, john kennedy, whom i generally admired, ran against richard nixon on the grounds that the republicans hadn't spent enough on defense, there had been a missile gap, and for years, i have been involved in this, democratic candidates for president were told, your one vulnerability is if you're weak on defense. that's why a really superb public ver servant, michael dukakis, made the mistake of being in the tank. he was a veteran, had a right to do it, but it didn't look good. i think what has happened is this, rachel. for 60 years, the american public was focused on -- 50 years, from 1940 to 1990, there were very bad people who were heavily armed, first hitler and then stalin and his successors, and they meant us ill. now, i believe that we did not see an evolution in the soviet union early enough and we overprepared for it, but there was this fear that we were going to be attacked by somebody powerful. and that led to military spending that i think in some cases was excessive. the soviet union collapses in

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20120802:01:35:00

remember, john kennedy, whom i generally admired, ran against richard nixon on the grounds that the republicans hadn't spent enough on defense, there had been a missile gap, and for years, i have been involved in this, democratic candidates for president were told, your one vulnerability is if you're weak on defense. that's why a really superb public serviceant michael dukakis made the mistake of being in the tank, he was a veteran, had a right to do it, but it didn't look good. i think what has happened is this, rachel. for 60 years, the american public was focused on -- 50 years, from 1940 to 1990, there were very bad people who were heavily armed, first hitler and then stalin and his successors, and they meant ulill. i believe we did not see an evolution in the soviet union early enough and we overprepared for it, but there was this fear that we were going to be attacked by somebody powerful.

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20110223:01:12:00

the chinese are not going to stop buying the oil. it's a world market. they put the product out. >> it's hard to imagine that we could boycott them to have the asset, they have the cash for right now. but looking at what's going on internal to libya, there seems to be civil war in tripoli. other regions of the country seem to be under the control of the revolutionaries. how does -- where does the military go and who's allegiance do they remain -- who do they remain loyal to? >> i think this is different from egypt. this is not a professional military. it is a tribal military with strange loyalties or divided loyalties. so the crucial question will be, you know, what is the critical mass, then, who controls it? and i think, ultimately, what's going to happen is somebody in the military, somebody powerful in the military is going to decide, is it worthwhile to side with gadhafi, or throw him overboard. because i do wonder with all this violence we're seeing, at the end of the day, the regime

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20171229:03:05:00

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20121114:08:04:00