Square Rosh News Today

item? >> i am with several organizations, but i have been listening here and i see this menu. it looks like disneyland to me. are we turning our part in disneyland? -- park into disneyland? parks should not be revenue generators. it is for people to enjoy. i wish you would consider that. thank you. >> is there any other public comment on this item? public comment is closed. president buell: commissioners? it has been moved and seconded. all in favor? its unanimous. thank you. >> we are...

>> good afternoon, commissioners. i am the central subway program manager. i am joined by the underground design manager. i am pleased to present the revised entrance for your review and consideration. to give the commission a bit of background, the subway has presented. this was selected as part of the process. the second time on february 21st, 2008, when the finding of minor impact on washington square park. it is our belief that this design that will be presented addresses the commi...

the in burma. processed. central subway has conducted five briefings on proposed design and has successfully received the endorsement from the business improvement district on the design that will be presented. the revised design has also been presented to the advisory group meeting. we have responded to the questions and concerns. also from a business perspective, they have the fair market value for the loss of the temporary and permanent space in the union square rosh. central subway...

perspective, they have the fair market value for the loss of the temporary and permanent space in the union square rosh. central subway has also employed the services of the original landscape architect, to design the park lay out. this will continue to work with the community and present future plans as we designed the plan process. with that, i would like to turn the presentation over. >> i dont think that your microphone is on. if you can speak into the other one for the moment. >> ...

some projects that were not selected did receive higher scores, hub of a lot of those projects did not fulfill the selection criteria as was outlined. in terms of what was selected, i feel that these projects did a fantastic job in terms of meeting every criteria that was required on the list independent of their score that we have -- that we may have come up with in the end. i feel that the recommendations that we made our solid recommendations. -- are solid recommendations. >> good a...

21st, 2008, when the finding of minor impact on washington square park. it is our belief that this design that will be presented addresses the committees desire to minimize the footprint on the union square parks. as compared to the previous design which was approved during the in burma. processed. central subway has conducted five briefings on proposed design and has successfully received the endorsement from the business improvement district on the design that will be presented. the ...

received the endorsement from the business improvement district on the design that will be presented. the revised design has also been presented to the advisory group meeting. we have responded to the questions and concerns. also from a business perspective, they have the fair market value for the loss of the temporary and permanent space in the union square rosh. central subway has also employed the services of the original landscape architect, to design the park lay out. this will co...

we submitted our application to the committee, they apply the criteria. there is one set of scores for these. there was no subsequent ranking after the discussion. then there were some talks, and we were not recommended for funding. i met with jake. the concerns that were put forward a scene to do with operations. we fulfill the operations requirement which is to work with the supervisor and acting superintendent. i got his signature. there are for the things to work out. he is committ...

overall selection process, the point at which the project was scored first is when the individual scores were reported that. as the committee work to the process of adhering to the criteria, several issues, some had to do with the details of the application. some had to do with issues of governance and access to the property. as those issues came up, take committee and bounced the project and it did not meet the current criteria as well as the projects that we have recommended. >> i wo...