Stat Chutes News Today

keeping a lot of this under wraps. the committee just announced a surprise hearing for tomorrow with very few details. its set to begin at 1:00 and the committee is saying they will present what theyre calling recently obtained evidence and saying theyll hear more witness testimony. no word yet on what the evidence is or who may be testifying, not even an indication on how many people will be testifying. but there has been this sense that the committee was getting inundated with new in...

we told him, the group that went over there outlined, you know, my belief in chances for success at this point. my belief was that it was very, very -- 5% to 10% is not a good optimistic outlook. >> the committee then showed how former president trump continued to embrace allegations of fraud, going against his white house lawyers, who told him that accusations were baseless were not substantial enough to make a difference in the election outcome. the justice department even told him t...

States who are vying to see who can pass more restrictive stat chutes. those issues will certainly come up and the supreme court decides what it wants to hear. maybe it ducks it once or twice. but it just cant permit these things to go on without deciding. and one of the most poignant concedes of the whole opinion is maybe theyre out of the business. on the contrary, they are going to be in it and for years, because these fights will be waged beginning at the state level. >> thank you all for yo...

Capitol. >> elliot, one line, a bit of what we heard from bill barr, he said if he really believes this stuff. if your audience is the doj and youre trying to convince them to file criminal charges of fraud here, how close can they get by saying, listen, all these rational people told him it wasnt true. is it necessary to prove that he actually believed that he lost the election and was still perpetrating the lie? >> its not just that theyre rational people. these are his legal advisers. theres ...

Working together. >> you have been saying that. i credit you with saying that first. we have senator gillibrand coming up, just to let our viewers up. you are one of 59 female lawmakers calling for congress to investigate the allegations against president trump. thats easier said than done. here is what chairman of the committee that would do that, trey gowdy said. hes on house oversight and government reform. heres what he says in response to your call for an investigation. allegations brought ...

To mitt romneys side. >> because of the war on women. i mean, listen, here is the thing. people are disen chanted with labels which is why you get this pro choice and pro-life 3450u6ment and some people consider pro-life to be against the death penalty and they dont want to be associated with labels because they associate with the labels as politic as usual. they may not want to admit there is a war on women. when we look at the stat chutes and different shats theyre trying to roll back the repr...