regulators have overseen that. is this an example where the federal government is in essence taking over what is traditionally been a state function. is that a good thing or maybe not such a good thing? in it s always been a risk. a big worry to a lot of us that believe that government operates best at a local level or a state level than it does in washington. i think this has demonstrated how infeasible that is. i think it s demonstrated how dysfunctional the entire system would be if it was regulated out of washington. anything else you see coming down the pike in 2014 that we ought to be braced for with obama care? we ve seen a dysfunction in the system. we ll see this system doesn t just effect those getting insurance for the first time. there will be a lot of people whose insurance plan changes. there will be a lot of us who pay more. there will be some who pay less. there will be a lot of confusion. this is a period of quite a bit
traditional state function of enacting and enforcing laws. claims to enforce foreign laws against foreign and u.s. citizens. these regulations were not made by the u.s. congress or some executive agency but by a foreign government with unfamiliar procedures. every one of those words, every word i just read to you from the first to the last appear in a 2003 case study from the heritage foundation you see on the screen now. just so you can officialize it. these three highlighted pages of the book from buzzfeed show how dense the copied portions are in governor paul s book. i guess it comes down to some kind of strange not that there was a mistake made and has been made in a number of other cases where words were taken down and used as his by a staffer i assume. he refuses to admit the obvious. this isn t a battle between him and rachel maddow or anyone else. this is a battle between him and evidence that has built up from a search engine that are used in colleges, universities, good
published material. well, the website buzzfeed went on to say there is a link to the heritage report in the back of his book but did not say the words were a direct lift. from page 132 of his book, quote, this prosecution also reveals the risks of federalizing criminal law. observers have long warned against allowing the federal government to encroach on the traditional state function of enacting and enforcing laws. claims to enforce foreign laws against foreign and u.s. citizens. these regulations were not made by the u.s. congress or some executive agency but by a foreign government with unfamiliar procedures. every one of those words, every word i just read to you from the first to the last appear in a 2003 case study from the heritage foundation you see on the screen now. just so you can officialize it. these three highlighted pages of the book from buzzfeed show how dense the copied portions are in governor paul s book. i guess it comes down to some kind of strange not that
of government services. there is a good example in the news today. we had a story about a guy in the air force who is in charge of policing sexual assaults himself being accused of that very crime. now law enforcement and that sort of thing is a natural state function. even in that situation, do you really want to give those institutions an absolute monopoly on this or would you rather have multiple channels of justice, multiple channels of redress? in almost every situation you re going to want more than one. i m not calling for an abolition of the public schools tomorrow, although i would kind of like for that to happen. i would like people to have more choices, more options for looking for innovative solutions to social problems. whether it is in health care or retirement or education. the current model of education, we have is essentially this one size fits all 19th century prussian factory model. we ve got 900 kinds of shampoo on the shelves and one kind of school. it doesn t make
primarily for overseas military is my understanding. so is it your understanding no one is involved in the taskforce that s involved with any company that would in any way profit from the recommendation made by this report if it was carried out nationally? i don t think so because nationally if this is carried out, schools are going to make decisions as to who in their school, are they going to expand school resource officers. those are relationships with the local sheriff s office, the local police department. but congressman they re training, you interrupted me. go ahead. their training is provided by local law enforcement, the law enforcement training center, for example, for the state. if you go to armed school personnel, i hope they utilize the private sector, not just a state function, generally would be state by state that would provide this training. and how much were you and the taskforce members paid for this