Steve Wildstein News Today

You would be quick to jump on it. you would as you should. do you see anything? my issue with this paragraph is, first of all, it says did he know before and did he direct it? that seems to be the key question. this paragraph talks about evidence exists but nobody seems to have the evidence. >> well, in fact, thats right. i am a lawyer. steve, its good to see you. >> good to see you. >> back in the day. even less than you say, steve. the lawyer does not say that mr. wilestein has evidence. it si...

Innocence? i mean, this is the reason this still captures so many peoples minds when they see this is people still dont know. >> i think todays interview shes very convincing. shes extremely sympathetic. shes for the first time almost weepy in her approach. the hairs been cut. it looks like shes sort of had a makeover for the purpose of projecting in a different way. a lot of the criticism of her initially was she came across as being cold and unfeeling. by the way, in jury trials or in judge tr...

Jefferson said. i am not calling for that. im not saying this is a crime but there is a pattern of bullying that this governors had throughout his term in office and this fits into that. >> that, of course, is what he has to put all of those sound bites back into headlines. they both agree, both steve and paul, that this is not a bombshell which seemed to be our take reading it. im not a lawyer. if we find out that he knew it before and that it wasnt a traffic study -- >> thats a different story...

Just played dont point to an exact date of when the governor knew and a source in the governors office tonight tells me that chris christie stands behind what he said at the press conference and the source categorically tells me that while the governor has not been specific about the exact date that he learned about the lane closures, he learned about them through press reports and the source further tells me that christie is still categorical that he did not know about them before and he did no...

Heres what happened. you have a burglar going into a house. he is surprised by a woman coming home. he kills her. he sexually assaults her, he leaves. what happens then is you have his dna and her dna, thats it on the crime scene. guess what, we have only that. if amanda and rafael were in the murder room, had anything to do with it, their dna, their finger prints, their evidence would be there. absence of evidence is evidence of absence. >> are you saying a burglar is the guy whos in jail now? ...

In the end, this evidence has been looked at and analyzed by a huge number of judges and ordinary people and ultimately we now have a finding of guilt. i think you cant say that their process isnt a correct process. they looked carefully at this evidence. you might disagree with their analysis, but they certainly tried to be careful. >> steve, to that point, first of all, i want to go through some of the evidence. we went through this last night. i know you find all of this evidence not to be co...

0 that? >> im too smart for that. i love the state of washington and i love the state of colorado. >> youre not running for anything anymore. >> interview with the president of the united states. remember, you can always follow us going on here in "the situation room." tweet me at wolf blitzer. tweet the show @cnn. thanks very much for watching. "erin burnett outfront" starts right now. next did he or didnt he? "the new york times" suggests chris christie knew more about the bridge closure tha...