Page 19 - Sunset Clause News Today

Would be party to that agreement. the iranians have been ambiguous as to whether they would leave the agreement of the united states did. i dont think it means war. there are a lot of interest here, political interest from the partners involved, economic interests, iran had a lot of markets open to it after these sanctions were lifted. if you believe iran is going to rush back to where it was before and continue on its path to a nuclear weapon if the united states pulls out of this agreement, pe...

United nations. but indeed contradicted contradicted the demands of our nations from this world body to bring governments together. >> he insisted his nation is abiding by the iranian nuclear agreement and denied his country wants a nuclear bomb. he says since the pact has the support of the international community, it should not be abandoned by one nation, the u.s. he said that with another dig at the white house. >> translator: it will be a great pity of this agreement or to be destroyed by ro...

List of our priorities along with north korea. one of the things we are looking at very hard is the disastrous iran deal. it facilitated iran. it didnt stop the nuclear aquestion significances, it just slowed it down. the sunset clause. but the president has maintained his stance. this is a bad deal its not good for american national security and we are doing a ground-up review of our iranian strategy and the president is adamant. this is not a good deal for america. judge jeanine: whats it like...

List of our priorities along with north korea. one of the things we are looking at very hard is the disastrous iran deal. it facilitated iran. it didnt stop the nuclear aquestion significances, it just slowed it down. the sunset clause. but the president has maintained his stance. this is a bad deal its not good for american national security and we are doing a ground-up review of our iranian strategy and the president is adamant. this is not a good deal for america. judge jeanine: whats it like...

By the white house. they continued to reduce the number of troops. i think from malikis standpoint, he didnt feel he could go to the parliament and run the political risk he would have to run. >> and just one quick question on the iranian pact. what is your understanding? what is your estimate of how quickly iran would get a nuclear weapon without this agreement? would it be shorter period of time or it would be the 15 years? >> i think its an interesting question, mike. even the president himse...

Technical redale released yesterday perhaps predictly did not dissuade petraeus from his view that the proposed terms of this deal for security u.s. and world. >> the deal would not shut down a single nuclear facility in iran. it would not destroy a sing centrifuge in iran and would not stop r&d on irans advance centrifuges. on the contrary the deal would legitimize irans illegal nuclear program. >> reporter: secretary of state john kerry is back on american soil following round-the-clock discus...

Intrusive, the guard will become defensive here and that could complicate matters. right now theres no signs of that, but as this goes on that may happen. another thing i was surprised is there was no sunset clause in this deal. for aspects of this deal to run indefinitelily was surprising to me for the iranians to accept. i wonder how that will pan out in the future over the decade of this deal. theres still a lot of moving part here. >> i want to bring in director for nonproliferation policy a...

To stay and will protect them from isis returning. and the chairman of the joint chief is frank about the senitarian revenge killings. so far he welcomes the involvement of iran on the ground. >> we are all concerned about what happens after the drums stop beating and isil is defeated and whether the government of iraq will remain on a path to provide an inclusive government for all of the various groups within. it we are concerned about that. >> in the center of the debate why they need a new i...

The various groups. were very concerned about that. >> at the center of the debate today on the hill and here at the pentagon briefing, why they need a new isis-specific authorization for the use of military force and why they are asking for a three-year sunset clause. >> the presidents proposed authorization to prevent the american people to assess our progress in three years time and provide the next president and the next congress the opportunity to reauthorize it if they find it necessary. t...

Beings on something that is important here namely what happens with this deal with iran. >> well, on the contrary, megyn i think this debate were having is incredibly important, and helpful to raising just what a bad deal president obama is about to make with iran. the last two days weve focused on the terms of the deal, which is one, president obama will accept a ten-year sunset clause and two, hes conceded a vast uranium enrichment capability to iran. that paves the way for iran to get the bom...