the a message to the ukrainian people that most of america stands with them. it was a message to russia and vladimir putin that the u.s. will continue to support ukraine militarily and otherwise. perhaps it was the a message for china. and other add adversary to not question america s willingness to defend democracy wherever it lives speaking of china. vladimir putin and xi jinping agreed to meet. joining us is dan hoffman. how do you assess the state of the war and the state of the region. we re tracking this horrific war of attrition with thousands of casualties on both sides. but really the story of the war is just the damage that russia has inflicted upon ukraine. deliberately targeting civilian neighborhoods and hospitals and maternity wards, that is why the ukraineanians are fighting on to force the russian out of their territory. but i think one story is that china is the big winner in this war right now, they are exploiting a weakened russia. which has been bloodied
we re making good progress, there has been no indication of air or water can contamination a out of the tests, except for surface water contamination in nearby sulfer run. trey: congressman as you talk with constituents and others, what is is they tell you they need and w whose responsibility is to make sure they have it? state, loa local or issue. they need a c collaborative solution, it will take federal epa, state epa, and county health officials, county emergency management agency. fema, hhs, cdc, but, it is the really road that will bear the responsibility for this i event. the epa adminstrator, michael r regan made that
North Carolina is latest state to file PFAS environmental remediation lawsuit against manufacturers of certain PFAS and PFAS-containing aqueous film-forming foam AFFF. The North Carolina PFAS lawsuit only pertains to contamination from two PFAS types – PFOA and PFOS.
coal ash ponds at duke university says that s because there isn t one. dr. abner vengosh of duke university published multiple studies on coal ash skills and contamination. told about the comments, the scientist tells wral, there s no published study that casts any doubt on whether moving coal ash out of leaky landfills is the best move for the environment. the exact quote from the scientist is this. what are they talking about? of course not. can there s evidence of groundwater contamination and surface water contamination at the coal ash pond, then leaving it as is obviously isn t an option if the environment is something you care about. you don t need to be joe chemist to figure that out. but what if you re jerome corsi trying to figure that out? or governor pat mccrory who apparently believes the same anti-science denialist nonsense about this disaster he s supposed to be dealing with in his state right now? the best-case scenario is to