this is simply to get across the message that corporations have bought our democracy, that it isn t working for the people of the united states, and that if we re going to get any of the progressive policies we want, we re going to have to take back the government. and so i believe that that message will stand or fall, and i will stand or fall as the person bringing that message, as an outsider in politics, on its own merits. so to me, the question here is am i saying something differential and important, and am i trusted to actually be the person to solve that problem? and that is the question that i ask all the time. and i think that s the same question every single person running for president should be asking themselves is what is the message i have that s different, how do i get across to people my history, i m an outsider in politics. for ten years, have been taking on corporations. and that s the question that i really ask myself. tom, if you re looking at the
never have legitimate criticisms. they will just call you an anti-semite. these conspiracy theories that have been targeting you avbasically have a tinge of anti-semitism to them. when they involve george soros, they do. that was created for political purposes. it s an absolute outrage. laura: okay, just so you understand, again, you cannot question the assumptions, the suppositions, the opinions of any of these witnesses, and you also can t question left-wing billionaire george soros again. if you do, you re an anti-semite. does that sound familiar to you? if you question open borders policies, you re anti-immigrant. if you question affirmative action, you re racist and so on and so on. democrats, you have to conclude they don t like free thought. they c pretend to like it. they want to make all the decisions for america here and
when aid is brought up the first thing you reference right after it is a favor of investigations into, you know, a fictional server or a no evidence of a server in ukraine and the bidens, that does, you can argue certainly, i know it is an arguable point. i know senator santorum will argue the bidens were not part of it. i think you can t question. obviously there is a linkage. and sondland is going to, his testimony becomes pivotal this week because he himself has testified he told the ukrainians that you re much more likely to get something done if you move on this announcement and you investigate the bidens. let me just say, i think the bigger point about this week is a pivotal week is up until now the white house has very successfully blocked our view from the oval office. we ve got the telephone call but beyond that they ve very carefully concealed what the
their opposition to turkey s offensive. so, you know t question is the trump administration going to try to push for some sort of permanent cease-fire there and also another issue they will likely bring up is the actions, behavior of the turkey-backed syrian forces on the ground who some u.s. officials say that the united states has powe potential evidence that they may have committed alleged war crimes in terrell days of that offensive. another very critical issue for the trump administration is the russian missile defense system that this nato country purchased and acquired from russia. they have their deliveries back in the summer, but they have not activated their system yet. the trump administration is under pressure to find a solution because president trump, based on u.s. law, should be sanctioning turkey for that move.
need to hear it with my own ears. i don t trust people s interpretations. dagen: are not sitting here, jessica, disparaging this man s character, his record. to say that people on the other side of the aisle can t question or ask about or delve into his motives, his background, his interpretation of this call harris: and that s why you want a fair process. so everybody gets the opportunity to do that. dagen: exactly. harris: governor huckabee told me yesterday, we were talking about whether general john kelly, when he was white house chief of staff, really did have that conversation telling the president he would be impeached if he hired yes-people around him, yes-men around them. governor huckabee was very careful. he said, you know what? i will respect john kelly. so i will step back from whether or not the conversation actually happen, but we are allowed to ask about it. and that s what you are saying. there s a way to talk about the lieutenant colonel vindman without go