to start this hour, let s brea down all of the news and how i view the trump indictment. sources familiar with th matter tell nbc news that trum faces around 30 charges of documented fraud connected to hush mone payments that he allegedly mad to cover up fast affairs in th run up to the 2016 election. two sources tell the associate press that it includes at leas one felony offense, and th exact charges at this moment against the ex president are still unknown. because the indictment remains sealed nbc news has now joined coalition of news organization urging that the indictment t be unsealed, citin overwhelming public interest ahead of trump s scheduled arraignment next tuesday that group is also requestin that cameras be allowed inside the courtroom during tuesday s proceedings. according to the new york times, trump and his aides were caugh off guard by the timing of the grand jury indictment which wa made public thursday afternoon thinking that any action was perhaps still
which tucker carlson makes ver clear, here is the motive. they re losing viewers, th maga viewers, because they are not lying to them. so to keep their stock price u they go forward with allies. what could be a bigger moral failure than that? yeah. a news organization is not a word, or two words that i woul use to describe fox at thi moment in time i greatly appreciate your time and insights this evening. the second hour of ayman start any moment we will look at how the trum indictmentou cld shake up th 2024 presidential race, don go anywhere. small business. (vo) verizon has business internet solutions nationwide. (man) for our not-so-small business too. (vo) get internet that keeps your business ready for anything. from verizon. i m your overly competitive brother. check. psych! and i m about to steal this game from you just like i stole kelly carter in high school. you got no game dude, that s a foul! and now you re ready to settle the score. game over. and if you don t
the potential moral feelings here, beyond the legal issues, alleging that fox pressured he into providing misleadin testimony. just the overall world feeling that we are seeing here. i think one thing that came out this week that was ver important is that fox has unit called the brain room and this unit is charged wit fact checking what goes on the air. so there were some people at fox who thought it was important that they didn t jus put bs out there and a bunch o lies especially on something as important as who won the presidential election. ten days after the election, the brain room sent it findings to fox management saying that this was all bs. and they should not put any of it on the air because it was untrue so to go tear question, mora feeling here is a news organization which for money to keep it -
when you test message someone something on your work phone and pole see what you are texting on a federal work phone and it ems that you have skin in the game against a political candidate atop the food chain trying to get into the white house, doesn t it make it complicated for everybody and make it look like there might be something untoward going on at the fbi in a very fair question? i think that s a very fair point and a very tear question and i m glad that ranking member cummings asked it. i think that at the end of the day, the question is whether, you know, the emotions expressed in those text messages actually, you know, ended up affecting his actions and actually causing bias in those actions. harris: can i ask you a question. that is what i m looking for, looking to try to answer. harris: and we all are, right? and so peter strzok strzok has been asked that question 50 different ways and his consistent answer is, oh, no, i would never do anything that would show that
them since their loved one was killed. that could go on and on and on. bill: this could happen today you re saying? typically that is not the case though, is it? say again? bill: typically you would go several is days weeks months. martha: such a definite sentence. there were no choice. we were discussing at the commercial break. the same thing with the american sniper defendant in texas. the judge had no choice. immediately after the verdict, there is no indeterminant factors. a question martha: or mitigating? correct. is there a question of judge physically pronouncing the sentence and sign the document and take him away. as his defense counsel if he wanted to say, your honor i respect the system, i m telling you looking in this court s eyes, i didn t kill anybody, i wouldn t have a problem with that. martha: that is interesting. nothing would be served by that other than some pr value