get out there and vote, by the storm. absolutely. it is a critical race to b watching congressman, congresswoman gwe moore and michelle goldber thank you. and that is tonight reidout. all in with chris hayes starts right now. tonight on all in - if the president wa reluctant, would you put him o the stand? it s a bad idea for trump because he lacks self control. the former presiden descends the golden air stairs landing in new york for hi surrendered justice, as ne evidence and the documents cas keeps on coming. i can t imagine you ever say, bring these boxes that w brought back from the whit house, i d like to look at them did you ever do that i don t have the right to d that there s nothing wrong with it. tonight, congressman adam schiff on the eve of trump s first court appearance plus, the timeline for finding out what s actually in the charges, and why the publicity seeking ex president is arguin against cameras and court. and why jack smith subpoenas for
entitled to that he s wrong about that. that intent, that kind o evidence can come in a trial not to prove action an conformity with the previous intent, but to actually prov intent it is called other bad act evidence, and even thoug that s normally excluded because a jury needs to, you know, in any case decide tha the intent was there for tha case, you can put in other bad acts as evidence to prov intent what you just referenced, which we just saw that clip, h clearly has a theory of the la here, which is that it s all his. i mean, he s not been shy abou that - he said it to hannity, o course although it, it s all mine this is essentially all made up he and others have said, i can declassify things with the power of my mind i could telepathically tur them over. there is evidence here als amassed by the reporting of th washington post that he sought advice from other lawyers. and advisers on how he could keep documents, after bein told by some in his team h could not, people familiar
involved in that letter, i could also be key evidence o obstruction. yes, i mean, so, the fact as publicly reported and established are bad enough right? you ve got a subpoena. you ve got him turning ove documents with the certification of his lawye saying there is nothing left then a search which finds that that document was false, right so that is establish beyon reasonable doubt, right? we know that there were classifie documents. so, then the question becomes, was it sloppy, oversight, or was their intent here? this evidence, just to read yo a few more parts, because want to get your feedback on the legal significance of this so, the report in october, trump s valet has told investigators that he move boxes at the former presidents obstruction, after the subpoen was issued smith steams video surveillanc footage corroborating th account. they have also evidenc indicating trump told others t mislead government officials i early 2022, before the
subpoena with the national archives and records administration was working with the justice department trying to recover a whitewash of papers, many of them not classified from trump s time as president. there seems to be a lot of evidence here of motive an knowledge and intent that s right, and that is key, because a mistake, yo know, can t be obstruction o justice. the concealing, the fals documents has to be done wit intent to obstruct or influenc and official proceeding. and an fbi investigation is by law and official proceeding. and i will tell you anothe thing about it, intent, all of that information that we r seeing, and evidence that we are hearing about bein accumulated, some of it goes you know, directly potentially to his intent during that time period, post subpoena, fre june 4th and some of those go eve before that, including eve some evidence i m seeing in th reporting, some informatio that he intended to sort of, you know, obstruct the archives, even getting things th