The D Case News Today

>> the thugsjfi] and criminals areçócorrupting our justice system, xdhes rallying his supporters as another legal probe, the special counsel criminal investigation intensifies.e1xdxdr >> ill talk to trumps attorney joe tacopina and preet bharara. >> your platform should be banned. >> tiktok ceo faces bipartisan ( skepticism that the app may be used for spying by the chinese government. >> has indeed spied on americaná citizens? >> i dont think that spying is the right way to describ...

Jeopardy, in fact, really leaned into it.xd his campaign made witch hunt signs in an effort to be featured prominently behind himá while he was speaking. >> the district attorney of new york under the auspices and direction of the department of q injustice in washington, dc dc, was investigating me for something that is not a crime, not a misdemeanor, not an affair.xdt( i never liked hors]@fñ prosecutorial misconduct is their new tool, and theyre willing to use it at levels never used before.t...

Lawyer took out a equityt( loanf his own money, paid money to someone hew3 didnt çóknow, to afford t($130,000 and didnt te the client aboutlp the legal agreement, and its a freight if thats, in fact, the case.t(ñi >> look, we put in the if, in fact, that is the case.ñ?ayr"$v chuck? >> no, i understand that. so what is it that youve learned about this case that changes your point of view? >> the facts. the facts. that what i just said and ill repeat it again, that this was personal expenditur...

Office. if there with -- were axd filin obligation, if hed taken tax obligation, if hed taken tax money, which he did nopá would be a crime.w3 if he had used campaign funds, wed have an argument here. this was a personal matter, and -- w3ok >> he called it legal fees th> they werent. no, its insane legal retainer ■ and it was legal fees by michael cohen who arranged it with his own money and took out a loan, resolved this without the president knowing and came back is not a bill in four times...

Didnt read it in the clip, which, if that is, in fact the d case, when imñr answering a hypothetical question without knowing the facts and i will respond how i think appropriate. now what i since learned is that there were no campaign funds used, that there was a legal invoice sent by a lawyer over the course of a year to cover these payments and more, and tze more importantly, that the campaign finance law is clear. bradley smith, former chairman of the fec, has come on and said clearly that ...