Page 86 - The Loop News Today

Ukraine interference. >> was there concern about doing the investigations or what? just make a statement about it? >> sondland testified that all he heard mr. giuliani sore anyone say is that they only needed the public announcement of the investigations. >> and so did the committee find that without that public statement there could be no white house meeting? >> yes. >> so i was struck by how clear the evidence seems to be on this point and i would like to play another example. >> was there a q...

Presidents agent. he was acting on behalf of the president expressing the presidents wishes, desires -- >> so what evidence did the committee find that corroborated the, quote, everyone was in the loop. >> well, ambassador sondland produced for his public testimony and i think it is very important in light of the testimony from mr. castor a minute ago with mr. buck, as to how many times that mr. sondland did not remember in his deposition. because we agree it was egregious. but the advantage of ...

Attempted to do that during this process. id like to say that. i have a couple other things, mr. armstrong, if i may. ambassador sondland is relied on. he went from a witness who was not very favorable to very favorable at his hearing. one of the remarkable statements at his hearing was everyone was in the loop. he types up this e-mail to pompeo, to the secretary, and the e-mails that he used to demonstrate that everyone was in the loop are not conclusive at all. talks about this statement that ...

The investigations or what? where they supposed to make a statement about it? >> ambassador sondland very clearly testified that all he ever heard mr. giuliani or anyone say is that they only needed the public announcement of the investigation. >> without that public statement that there would be no white house meeting. >> yes. >> i was struck by how clear the evidence seems to be on this point and id like to play another example. >> was they were a quid pro quo? as i testified previously with r...

Interference. >> but was there concern about doing the investigations or what? were they justns supposed to ma a statement about it? what? >> ambassador sondland very clearly testified that all he ever heard mr. giuliani or anyone say is that they only needed the public announcement of the investigations. >> and so did the committee find that without that public statement that there would be no white house meeting? >> yes. >> so>> i was struck by how cle the evidence seems to be on this point. a...

It. volk i know you were looking at it. great to see you. volker and yermak toyed around let me tell you what comes now. with the statement and the other huge legal story which ultimately both sides decided is also in here, bad news for that it wasnt a good plan. te they didnt do it. donald trump. im going to tell you everything you need to know right now about president trumps own department so the fact that sondland is of justice validating the emailing the secretaryan talkin about this t stat...

Abuse his office, undermine his attempted to do that during this oath of office, use the powers process. of the presidency for his own id like to say that. personal gain are clearly going to be articles of impeachment and there are any number of ways and i have a couple of other you can slice how theyre things, mr. armstrong. stated, including abusing your >> go ahead. >> you know, ambassador sondland power in order for bribery, for extorsion and to interfere in our election. is relied on and he...

Tome walk you through some of t evidence underlying it. admittedly it is a lot to digest. but let me just say this. the presidents scheme is actually quite simple. the facts are not seriously in dispute.ou can it be boiled down to four key takeaways. first, that president trump t directed a scheme to pressure ukraine into opening two investigations that wouldwo ve benefit his 2020 re-election campaign and not the u.s. national interest. second, president trump used his official office and the of...

Questions weve seen over the past two, three years of what makes someone your lawyer. when is michael cohen your lawyer, when is he the fixer? >> ive been told you dont even have to give them a dollar, you dont even have to pay them anything. rudy giuliani has said during the entire mueller investigation he was doing this for free, he was not getting paid at all. but he has been working for free on this. during the mueller investigation of course rudy was very in the loop. he was part of the leg...

Trying true make they are perry mason like or judge -- whatever her name is, judge judy and make motions to adjourn and try to -- try to obstruct the hearing but question the facts and question some of the facts that were presented and say that theyre here say -- hearsay but a lot of it is hearsay but saying by the way there is a favor we would like to ask, that is the biggest admission against interest weve ever had and that is a sufficient to prove it and then mick mulvaney coming out and goin...