To Misrepresent News Today

Taking an already simmerin cauldron of anxiety of fear, o hate, of rage and they are ratcheting up that temperature bit by bit every time they sort o misrepresent, miss sample th threat of crime, who i actually responsible, that it coming for you, they are basically raising th temperature on that cauldron it should be no surprise tha its increasingly starting t spill over and boil over its kind of what theyre doing, and they are organizing powe on the fringes this is what you get when it moved d...

Disinformation, feedback loop, that itself is a problem, bu in a way, its actually less scary than the current scenario because a couple of years ag and now, its fully formed there was a switch basically, the republican part via the right-wing media decided that they were going t organize power on what was use to be considered differences one state moved those fringe and sent darkly front an center in the republican core, it actually basically pulls an people that are most likely to act on these...

Underlying fears to motivate voters. cambridge analytica sent cnn a statement rejecting the allegations made in channel 4s reporting. it is ed itted to misrepresent. they say they entertained a series of ludacris, hypothetical scenarios. he is aware how this looks but it is not the case when the reporter turned the conversation to entrapment and corruption, the executives left with grave concerns and did not meet him again. nix added i must emphatically state that we do not engage honey traps an...

Contradictory testimony. both sides of the testimony were under oath what session said in january, what he is saying now, what he said to the house versus what he said to the senate. are those the ingredients for the legal definition of perjury? >> yeah, so, again, its intentionally trying to misrepresent. so the standard is whats going on in his mind. do we believe that he actually is just the most forgetful person in washington history with a very loose understanding of what the truth, or is h...

Are there? i mean, you have completely contradictory testimony. both sides of the testimony were under oath what session said in january, what he is saying now, what he said to the house versus what he said to the senate. are those the ingredients for the legal definition of perjury? >> yeah, so, again, its intentionally trying to misrepresent. so the standard is whats going on in his mind. do we believe that he actually is just the most forgetful person in washington history with a very loose u...