then it s driving this party off of the cliff. tucker: so how much do you think of this is being driven bo alexandria ocasio-cortez on the rest? 100% of it. the progressive wing of the democratic party is in control of the party. it s in control of the media and all the talking heads. so folks that i know, my friends at her democrats repeat the same stuff and they aren t even thinking critically or foru themselves. we don t stop to ask a questionn is there something about hunter biden and christopher hines who worked forou him and is there something to the fact that joe biden put in some phone calls? the new york times ran an articlet last may that highlighted this concern foram biden and his campaign. the raise the alarm flag. so it s not trump, trumpets and
transcript he has not written. again, its accusations innuendo and rumor where there is no evidence i of any overturn the results of the election ever since day one was reflected. tucker: says there no and he said these things, nancy pelosi has announced different things she would teach him. this whistle-blower, and i don t think they ve seen the whistle-blower report. it s purely being based on media i whipped up at hysteria and frenzy over evidence that many people in the americans so
so it comes down to this. what s striking to me about this, tucker, is that trump has already agreeing to release the full unredacted transcript of his phone conversation upon which this whole thing is supposedly based. and, t as of tonight, he s also apparently prepared to release the whistle-blower complaint they are saying they must have. now, i ask you this. dore you think donald trump woud go forth and release two documents that were highly incriminating? i have my doubts. tucker: me, too. of course. to do so, so quickly, which makes this whole thing seem even more idiotic. i don t think nancy pelosi is idiotic. i think she s good at politics, that s why she s the speaker of the house. so what is she thinking, do you think? brit: i think she sdo thinking that she needs to be responsive to the needs of her caucus. s look at what she did today. it was really quite clever if you think about it. did she have a vote in the house to conduct an impeachment inquiry? no. she did not.
scent has to try, the chief justice of the united states supreme court has to try. tucker: so everything has. but if you could sum up, just because i think it s helpful like they do in high school side forake the other a second. what is your opponent saying? if you could sum up their case in one second, what is it exactly? hating president trump, that s literally all that they have. and so this is just a shotgun tactic that we use in legal speakk to say they are throwing everything against the wall to see what sticks. nancy pelosi had evidence of something that she can t clearlt they know they can t even reach the threshold of capital clause. and to hear say we will impeach the president of the
conscience will compel them to stand up for impeachment and for this country. tucker: will that kid get off the stage? i can t play another sand bite from that mediocrity. t and that turns to where they should go next with things. tucker: and by the way, we are part of the problem, it s irresistible. like at this stage, so what is the political calculation if you are running for president right now and you see the colleagues in the house doing this? first i will say to reiterate what sean davis said, there s been momentum in the shift for impeachment but there is no formalal inquiry. bthere has been no vote and no announcement. that s why with nixon and