Twisting Law News Today

A warning for trump judge Tanya Chutkan makes clear the ex president s free speech is not absolute in his upcoming Election Interference case. Plus, on ethical and possibly illegal Clarence Thomas exception of luxury gifts and travel might finally force the court to take action. And, breaking developments in the Georgia Election probe, our strongest indication yet that a grand jury could indict donald trump in a matter of days. I am ayman mohyeldin, lets get started. And we begin with that Break...

Illegal Clarence Thomas exception of luxury gifts and travel might finally force the court to take action. And, breaking developments in the Georgia Election probe, our strongest indication yet that a grand jury could indict donald trump in a matter of days. I am Ayman Mohyeldin lets, get started. And we begin with that Breaking News out of georgia this hour, fulton countys returning fani willis will begin presenting her Election Interference case against donald trump and his allies to a grand j...

New mexico, he completely twisted everything out of shape. and to get into the weeds of how he did it, its really basically piling on. i dont think i need to do that, the indictment makes it clear. a lot of other steelers have now gone into it. there is an essay on msnbc.com by norm eisen and fragile wartime or today it. explains it all. i dont want to make it look like, oh, i am offended that can trust burrow did something to my work. thats really not what the important point is. the important ...

Thats really not what the important point is. the important point is that a number of lawyers unlike the great tradition of making even pretty bold arguments in court, in open court. just an adversary and a judge to weigh things. a number of lawyers and secret or waiting openings, twisting law with nobody on the other side. its a lot like what alan dershowitz did. although, that was in, you know, in the wide open. there was really nobody who was going to make a judgment except for the senate, wh...

We want to look at the legality and the constitutionality of what the u.s. president is proposing here. and the u.s. house speaker said this about president obama. i want to just read this out directly from his statement on monday. his proposals to restrict gun rights before debated by the united states senate and rejected. no president should be able to reverse legislative failure by executive fear, not even incrementally. is he right? >> hes right about the second part. if the president decide...