the sending of a delegation of former senior officials is the sending of a delegation of former senior officials- former senior officials is not unprecedented. _ former senior officials is not unprecedented. the - former senior officials is not unprecedented. the unitedl former senior officials is not - unprecedented. the united states did send a _ unprecedented. the united states did send a delegation in prior taiwan elections — send a delegation in prior taiwan elections. but i would emphasise, yes, it _ elections. but i would emphasise, yes, it has — elections. but i would emphasise, yes, it has always been a former senior_ yes, it has always been a former senior officials, and frankly in my discussions — senior officials, and frankly in my discussions with some experts, i since _ discussions with some experts, i since they— discussions with some experts, i since they find this reassuring. they— since they find this reassuring. they know _ since they find this reassuring. they know steve hadley and jim steinberg and they expect that the message _ steinberg and they expect that the message is that they will be sending to taiwan's — message is that they will be sending to taiwan's new governments, incoming — to taiwan's new governments, incoming government, will be those that are _ incoming government, will be those that are also in beijing's interest, so i actually think that this delegation is welcomed by at least some in china.— delegation is welcomed by at least some in china. could you elaborate on that a bit _ some in china. could you elaborate on that a bit more? _ some in china. could you elaborate on that a bit more? why _ some in china. could you elaborate on that a bit more? why china - some in china. could you elaborate| on that a bit more? why china sees this delegation perhaps is not such a threat to their ambitions over taiwan? �* ., , ., ., , taiwan? again, these are not sitting
indicted for another criminal federal charge?— indicted for another criminal federal chare? g , ., , federal charge? my first thoughts are about justice _ federal charge? my first thoughts are aboutjustice in _ federal charge? my first thoughts are aboutjustice in these - federal charge? my first thoughts are aboutjustice in these unitedl are aboutjustice in these united states. i know thatjustice isn't possible if accountability doesn't come first. so today is a great day to see the former president arraigned on these charges because it shows that nobody is above the law, and that's something you hear a lot from many political people who believe in putting country over party, again principles over politics. and this is the kind of moment which will take my breath away, i'll be honest. i hear many fellow publicans calling it a dark day for democracy — if donald trump are not held accountable for his actions onjanuary 6th, 2021, where he held his seat as the leader of the free world, the former leader of the free world, the former leader of the free world, the former leader of the free world, we are really in dark territory if we didn't see him held accountable. so i thinkjustice needs to prevail, it will prevail. again, he's not been charged guilty,
ah and political interests ahead of the interest of the country, we can recognizeeath that they e directly and intentionally undermining that very foundation of our democrac y is the rule of law. and they're doing it in two ways. number rule of law and one, speo after political opponents, namely donald trump, donald trump supporters. >> and number two, to protect themselves to protect joe biden, to protect hunter biden, to protect their personal and politicalonaa allies. the american people need to recognizend very clearly what is happening here, the threat to our democracy and we have to make the decision to to put a stop otheision tot to not allow thiso on because otherwise we'll find ourselves in the situation. the unitedl find o states of america,s is where this is now the new norm. whatever party becomes the party in power will say, hey, look, the last guy did this. we wil can use the power of lawtho enforcement. we can use our department of justicwer ofe to go after political opponents. >> and that's not important to. >> but i agree with you. if fbi is weaponized and politicized, that's
result of that need summit and that's have a listen to what she asked him just a few moments ago. you came in with a very big smiles. this is been a great and successful summit_ this is been a great and successful summit where we have made decisions on stepping _ summit where we have made decisions on stepping our support in ukraine and nate _ on stepping our support in ukraine and nato membership and also we are able to— and nato membership and also we are able to make an important decision to make _ able to make an important decision to make sure that sweden will become a full member of the alliance. what about the membership _ a full member of the alliance. �*w�*iat about the membership this year was make it look like there was some disunity here. mil make it look like there was some disunity here-— make it look like there was some disunity here. all allies agree that we have a very — disunity here. all allies agree that we have a very strong _ disunity here. all allies agree that we have a very strong and - disunity here. all allies agree that we have a very strong and unitedl we have a very strong and united message — we have a very strong and united message that ukraine will become a member_ message that ukraine will become a member of the alliance and it will be extended when the conditions are met and _ be extended when the conditions are met and also on concrete tools to help them — met and also on concrete tools to help them move towards nato membership. we help them move towards nato membership-— help them move towards nato membershin . ., ~' ., ., , membership. we talk about conditions bein: met, membership. we talk about conditions being met, definitely _ membership. we talk about conditions being met, definitely not _ membership. we talk about conditions being met, definitely not before - membership. we talk about conditions being met, definitely not before a - being met, definitely not before a cease—fire but don't we need to be
everything but as your previous guests— everything but as your previous guests said, they haven't offered roots _ guests said, they haven't offered roots of— guests said, they haven't offered roots of safe passage for asylum—seekers. it is diplomacy that really— asylum—seekers. it is diplomacy that really matters. we know on friday the prime — really matters. we know on friday the prime minister is going to meet emmanuel— the prime minister is going to meet emmanuel macron and that is where there _ emmanuel macron and that is where there is— emmanuel macron and that is where there is a _ emmanuel macron and that is where there is a real possibility of change _ there is a real possibility of change i_ there is a real possibility of change i would say, not with the law or the _ change i would say, not with the law or the government itself is saying at this— or the government itself is saying at this stage is pretty much unworkable.— at this stage is pretty much unworkable. . , , , , unworkable. larny, the republicans have taken a _ unworkable. larny, the republicans have taken a hard _ unworkable. larny, the republicans have taken a hard line _ unworkable. larny, the republicans have taken a hard line in _ unworkable. larny, the republicans have taken a hard line in america i unworkable. larny, the republicans| have taken a hard line in america on immigration. do you think deterrence works? i immigration. do you think deterrence works? ~' ., immigration. do you think deterrence works? ~ ., ., . ., works? i think to a certain degree it works. works? i think to a certain degree it works- the _ works? i think to a certain degree it works. the challenge _ works? i think to a certain degree it works. the challenge of - works? i think to a certain degree it works. the challenge of course | works? i think to a certain degree i it works. the challenge of course is that there — it works. the challenge of course is that there are — it works. the challenge of course is that there are incentives _ it works. the challenge of course is that there are incentives that - that there are incentives that exist. — that there are incentives that exist, certainly— that there are incentives that exist, certainly in— that there are incentives that exist, certainly in the - that there are incentives that exist, certainly in the unitedl exist, certainly in the united states. _ exist, certainly in the united states, probably— exist, certainly in the united states, probably in - exist, certainly in the united states, probably in the - exist, certainly in the united states, probably in the uk . exist, certainly in the unitedl states, probably in the uk as exist, certainly in the united - states, probably in the uk as well that bring — states, probably in the uk as well that bring people _ states, probably in the uk as well that bring people from _ states, probably in the uk as well that bring people from hostile - that bring people from hostile regimes, _ that bring people from hostile regimes, places _ that bring people from hostile regimes, places where - that bring people from hostile regimes, places where they. that bring people from hostilel regimes, places where they do that bring people from hostile - regimes, places where they do not feel safe _ regimes, places where they do not feel safe to— regimes, places where they do not feel safe to a — regimes, places where they do not feel safe to a society _ regimes, places where they do not feel safe to a society where - regimes, places where they do not feel safe to a society where they. feel safe to a society where they can he _ feel safe to a society where they can be opportunity— feel safe to a society where they can be opportunity where - feel safe to a society where they can be opportunity where they . feel safe to a society where they. can be opportunity where they feel safer~ _ can be opportunity where they feel safer~ some — can be opportunity where they feel safer~ some of— can be opportunity where they feel safer. some of that _ can be opportunity where they feel safer. some of that migration- can be opportunity where they feel safer. some of that migration is. safer. some of that migration is happening — safer. some of that migration is happening as _ safer. some of that migration is happening as a _ safer. some of that migration is happening as a function - safer. some of that migration is happening as a function of- safer. some of that migration is happening as a function of the l happening as a function of the difference _ happening as a function of the difference between _ happening as a function of the difference between societies i happening as a function of the . difference between societies and happening as a function of the - difference between societies and the state of _ difference between societies and the state of the — difference between societies and the state of the societies _ difference between societies and the state of the societies across - difference between societies and the state of the societies across the - state of the societies across the world _ state of the societies across the world i — state of the societies across the world ithink— state of the societies across the world. i think the _ state of the societies across the world. i think the challenge - state of the societies across the world. i think the challenge of. state of the societies across the . world. i think the challenge of the united _ world. i think the challenge of the united states— world. i think the challenge of the
not the way that the american government deals with it? why do we not see federal workers going on strike? i not see federal workers going on strike? ~' , ., �* not see federal workers going on strike? ~ i. �* , not see federal workers going on strike? ~ , ., �* , ., strike? i think you're seeing a new resurgence — strike? i think you're seeing a new resurgence of— strike? i think you're seeing a new resurgence of union _ strike? i think you're seeing a new resurgence of union workers - strike? i think you're seeing a new i resurgence of union workers coming together— resurgence of union workers coming together and — resurgence of union workers coming together and figuring _ resurgence of union workers coming together and figuring out _ resurgence of union workers coming together and figuring out how- resurgence of union workers coming together and figuring out how do - together and figuring out how do they get— together and figuring out how do they get help _ together and figuring out how do they get help with _ together and figuring out how do they get help with the _ together and figuring out how do they get help with the pressuresj they get help with the pressures that they're _ they get help with the pressures that they're feeling _ they get help with the pressures that they're feeling from - they get help with the pressures l that they're feeling from inflation, but in _ that they're feeling from inflation, but in general, _ that they're feeling from inflation, but in general, it's— that they're feeling from inflation, but in general, it's been— that they're feeling from inflation, but in general, it's been an - that they're feeling from inflation, i but in general, it's been an ongoing process— but in general, it's been an ongoing process for— but in general, it's been an ongoing process for unions _ but in general, it's been an ongoing process for unions in _ but in general, it's been an ongoing process for unions in the _ but in general, it's been an ongoing process for unions in the united - process for unions in the united states — process for unions in the united states they— process for unions in the united states. they have _ process for unions in the united states. they have been - process for unions in the united states. they have been seeing i process for unions in the unitedl states. they have been seeing a process for unions in the united - states. they have been seeing a new generation, — states. they have been seeing a new generation, new— states. they have been seeing a new generation, new tactics _ states. they have been seeing a new generation, new tactics and - states. they have been seeing a new generation, new tactics and ways - states. they have been seeing a new generation, new tactics and ways of. generation, new tactics and ways of making _ generation, new tactics and ways of making sure — generation, new tactics and ways of making sure they have _ generation, new tactics and ways of making sure they have a _ generation, new tactics and ways of making sure they have a voice. - generation, new tactics and ways of. making sure they have a voice. when you think— making sure they have a voice. when you think about — making sure they have a voice. when you think about the _ making sure they have a voice. when you think about the businesses - making sure they have a voice. when you think about the businesses that i you think about the businesses that have grown— you think about the businesses that have grown in — you think about the businesses that have grown in the _ you think about the businesses that have grown in the technology - you think about the businesses that| have grown in the technology sector that don't _ have grown in the technology sector that don't have _ have grown in the technology sector that don't have unions, _ have grown in the technology sector that don't have unions, you - have grown in the technology sector that don't have unions, you see - have grown in the technology sector that don't have unions, you see thisj that don't have unions, you see this disparity— that don't have unions, you see this disparity that— that don't have unions, you see this disparity that has _ that don't have unions, you see this disparity that has been _ disparity that has been happening between — disparity that has been happening between management— disparity that has been happening between management and - disparity that has been happening . between management and workers. disparity that has been happening - between management and workers. i would _ between management and workers. i would say— between management and workers. i would say this— between management and workers. i would say this is— between management and workers. i would say this is not— between management and workers. i would say this is not a _ between management and workers. i would say this is not a one _ between management and workers. i would say this is not a one time - between management and workers. i would say this is not a one time or. would say this is not a one time or how this _ would say this is not a one time or how this is — would say this is not a one time or how this is going _ would say this is not a one time or how this is going to _ would say this is not a one time or how this is going to happen, - would say this is not a one time orl how this is going to happen, i think we are all— how this is going to happen, i think we are all seeing _ how this is going to happen, i think we are all seeing a _ how this is going to happen, i think we are all seeing a new— how this is going to happen, i think we are all seeing a new reinventionj we are all seeing a new reinvention of the union— we are all seeing a new reinvention of the union movement _ we are all seeing a new reinvention of the union movement now. - we are all seeing a new reinvention of the union movement now. [5- we are all seeing a new reinvention of the union movement now. is jamie riiht? do of the union movement now. is jamie right? do we — of the union movement now. is jamie right? do we have _ of the union movement now. is jamie right? do we have to _ of the union movement now. is jamie right? do we have to accept - of the union movement now. is jamie right? do we have to accept we're - right? do we have to accept we're getting poorer?— getting poorer? yes, i think we are all suffering _ getting poorer? yes, i think we are all suffering from _ getting poorer? yes, i think we are all suffering from inflation - getting poorer? yes, i think we are
was the fact whether wy e will e a democracy in the future, whetheure, r our children will arrested and conceivably killed. we'rvably kille on the edge of l authoritarian system and it could be a weebrk away. >> he's just tremblingek away. with fear from his dc mansion. s he sees january six around every turn. mansy fathom whyd abou voters are worried about inflation, gas prices, violentie wokeation, gas prices, violentie like. woke education. kids aren't learning to read, write, do math , science, history. and and of course, computers. and chicken little is so painfully detached from reality that it seems to be rotting his. brain. he's not alone . 's not alone so-called journalists across the country now believe thatev the end is near. s of ree end is near. s of a republican win meanspu life as we know it is over. >> tak le a look.>> democracy is in danger all over the world here in the unitedl states as well, but it's allover over the world. secretar y clinton, they're p pushing out all of these polls,s
reasonable. they , like robert said,, they essentiallytheyf my strip f my due process rights. i wasn't even allowed to appeal the decision to anybody. you can't do that in the unitedl states . the law makers need to be held accountable foe for whr what tha back in august, robert , a judge struck down browser's j mandat e for all d.c. government workers to be vaccinated against covid. id. >> so does that help you here? oh, sure. and you take a look, you talk about getting lost on this. of course, you did, becauseer they passed over 16 different emergency orders.over they passed over fifteenparate separate d.c. is it still in effect, the emergency order in d.c.? there is som d.c.?e provisions h i think are still a never ending emergency, by the way. yeah, noy the , it and that, of course, is part of the problem. i mean, that goes to the fact if it's a never ending emergency, take for instance,ven the vaccine mandate. they announced it three weeks before they actually implementedi.d. as how much of an emergency was liv it? we live under the rule of law. they needed to comply with theof basic rules of law even during
you look at goods, the price of those rose by 12.4% in the year to may and it is that really driving inflation. services are more driven by labour costs and pay increases, etc, it is 4.9%, so the main force behind this inflation is not wage demands by unions, for example, or even pay increases by employers trying to recruit new people. in fact, the main driver of inflation here without any shadow of a doubt is global and a stone to the reopening of the economy after the pandemic and the war in ukraine driving up those price levels. does that mean inflation _ driving up those price levels. does that mean inflation in _ driving up those price levels. does that mean inflation in other european countries are similar to ours? , ., j~ ~ ours? yes, our 8.6% in the nited states. inflation _ ours? yes, our 8.696 in the nited states. inflation in _ ours? yes, our 8.696 in the nited states. inflation in the _ ours? yes, our 8.696 in the nited states. inflation in the eurozonel ours? yes, our 8.696 in the nitedl states. inflation in the eurozone is pretty high, slightly lower than ours, i think then you look at different ages. if you take the old—fashioned retail price index measure used in the 1970s and 1980s,
the next few days but there is little once in a carriage, the absolute cherry on top of the weekend. i think that might be our biggest story but i'm excited to see what is yet to come with seen so many surprises on these big events from the royal family for don't have the coming out of a helicopter this time. you think it was a stunt double? �* . , time. you think it was a stunt double? �* ., , . ., , double? i'm really excited to see what happens — double? i'm really excited to see what happens over— double? i'm really excited to see what happens over the _ double? i'm really excited to see what happens over the next - double? i'm really excited to see i what happens over the next couple double? i'm really excited to see - what happens over the next couple of days. what happens over the next couple of da s. �* . . ~ what happens over the next couple of da s. �*, ., what happens over the next couple of das. �*, , what happens over the next couple of das. �*, ., , days. let's talk a little bit about the service- _ days. let's talk a little bit about the service. i _ days. let's talk a little bit about the service. i live _ days. let's talk a little bit about the service. i live in _ days. let's talk a little bit about the service. i live in the - days. let's talk a little bit about the service. i live in the unitedl the service. i live in the united states, you're from the united states, you're from the united states and there is a transatlantic divide over the sussex is. a huge amount of attention, or the american networks are talking about whether harry and megan were going to attend. we did see them. what was the reaction to them being there. there is a lot of power is at play making sure that the queen is the highlight of this week inevitably a part of the story. just the presence has meant so much. i they so important or interesting? it is just