Vad Validly News Today

Claiming that that law applies to the shooter is taking a person who was pursuing in the role of a citizen watch and he wasnt watching. he clearly was armed with a firearm, a lethal weapon and he was pursuing even though he was told by the 911 operator not to pursue. so i dont see how you can va d validly claim a swelf-defense argument under the stand your ground that you. in fact i think the stand your ground law supports trayvon martin and the vehicle tip. he had 9 right to stand his ground in...