Latest Breaking News On - Version of - Page 1 : vimarsana.com
they're donald trump's friends. on the defense side, you'll probably hear a version of, try to keep an open mind. the evidence is not all in. we don't have the burden. just sort of the standard fair, but you're not going to see anything as flashy, anything as dramatic, as exciting as we're going to see during closing arguments. this is only going to be a preview, and it will not take the entire day at all. >> interesting. >> you know, as danny said, in mob cases, there are jurors that will tell the judge they're afraid for their safety and want to get off. he said this isn't exactly like that, but, really, it is in many cases, in that a lot of the jurors are fearful of repercussions if they're in on a jury that's impaneled that rules against donald trump. i mean, because they want their names -- the judge trying to keep the names from getting out there, but, over time, this is
police _ in the police become involved, the police say. — in the police become involved, the police say, ok suggesting criminality, any evidence that may have _ criminality, any evidence that may have to _ criminality, any evidence that may have to be — criminality, any evidence that may have to be gathered, has to be untainted — have to be gathered, has to be untainted by things that have gone on inside _ untainted by things that have gone on inside your organisation. the primary— on inside your organisation. the primary concern for a detective in this situation would be getting hold of witnesses, in particular witnesses with principles in the story— witnesses with principles in the story and — witnesses with principles in the story and be able to sit down and say to— story and be able to sit down and say to them, writes thom yorke version — say to them, writes thom yorke version of— say to them, writes thom yorke version of events. there is always a risk for— version of events. there is always a risk for a _ version of events. there is always a risk for a police officer in the situation. _ risk for a police officer in the situation, by the time they don't ask an _ situation, by the time they don't ask an organisation to pause their own investigations, to basically step back— own investigations, to basically step back unless the police do their work _ step back unless the police do their work there — step back unless the police do their work. there is a risk that when they sit down _ work. there is a risk that when they sit down with — work. there is a risk that when they sit down with a witness, what they say might— sit down with a witness, what they say might be tainted by things that have gone on behind the scenes with an organisation. they want that evidence — an organisation. they want that evidence as clean as possible without — evidence as clean as possible without any kind of interference. it
want _ privacy act and the kids act and i want to— privacy act and the kids act and i want to thank all of the researchers, the young people, the parents. _ researchers, the young people, the parents, the surgeon general of the united _ parents, the surgeon general of the united states, who have explained the correlation between social media usage _ the correlation between social media usage and _ the correlation between social media usage and body dissatisfaction, disordered eating habits, anxiety, depression, self injury, suicide ideation— depression, self injury, suicide ideation and cyber bullying. heck, frances— ideation and cyber bullying. heck, frances haugen, the facebook whistle—blower, was right here and testified _ whistle—blower, was right here and testified to us that facebook and instagram conducted research on this topic. _ instagram conducted research on this topic. they— instagram conducted research on this topic, they knew and understood the harms. _ topic, they knew and understood the harms. but _ topic, they knew and understood the harms, but they continued to elevate profits _ harms, but they continued to elevate profits over _ harms, but they continued to elevate profits over the well— being of children _ profits over the well— being of children. and tiktok does the same. last congress, when we passed the adp pa. _ last congress, when we passed the adp pa, the committee incorporated many— adp pa, the committee incorporated many of— adp pa, the committee incorporated many of these important child online and safety _ many of these important child online and safety provisions from my bills, but we _ and safety provisions from my bills, but we can— and safety provisions from my bills, but we can make v1118th congress's version _ but we can make v1118th congress's version of— but we can make v1118th congress's version of this bill, of this new
amazon.com. and bookstores on march 14. this also a version of. sacrifice and survival. debut 9 p.m. on march 19. on fox news channel. foherer now, let not your heart be troubled, laura ingraham up next with ingram angle have a great weekend. ♪ ♪ mark: hello america, i am mark levin this is "life, liberty an id levin." you know a great honor to come to yoit'su every sunday night on this network. fox newsight channel.s and i want you to know something i could not do it show anywhere else on cable, network tv. because they wouldn't alloww
president and the vice president. >> well, we have bob woodward's version of, in which is -- i was gonna say it's word, for a word what we heard today, but it's more than that. bob woodward has more words in it about that conversation, including, it has mike pence and that conversation with donald trump, saying, i tried everything. i tried every way to try to get around this, and i couldn't find anything. that's the person who we heard from, greg jacob today, never wavered. from the first moment that mike pence raised this question of what happened on january 6th, his aides said mike pence believed that he had no choice just like al gore had no choice. and he never wavered in that. jacob said in this video, he was a steely and determined when he came out of that phone call with the president on january 6th. i wish he was steely and determined on december 6th, when he could've said the vice president has no choice. and so, this drama, this tragedy, it was so much a product of mike pence's deliberate cowardly silence for
president and the vice president. >> well, we have bob woodward's version of, it which is i was gonna say it's word for word what we heard today, but it's more than that. bob woodward has more words in it about that conversation, including it has mike pence and that conversation with donald trump, saying, i tried everything. i tried every way to try to get around this, and i couldn't find anything. that's the person who we heard from, greg jacob today, never wavered. from the first moment that mike pence raised this question of what happened on january 6th, his aides said mike pence believed that he had no choice to, just like al gore had no choice. and he never wavered in that. jacob said in this video, he was a steely and determined when he came out of that phone call with the president on january 6th. i wish he was steely and determined on december 6th, when he could've said the vice
>> a few feet away. still got one last point to get to, made about the hearing today, about the safety of vice president mike pence, and what mike pence, apparently, thought president trump might be capable of in that moment. so, that's still to come. we will run down that from the hearing as well, sort of last portion of our recap tonight. but again, before we get to that last point, i wanna make sure we digest what we are seeing as we go. lawrence, some of this we know before, but not all. certainly, we did not know all of it. but i don't think we knew about the interactions between the president and the vice president. >> well, we have bob woodward's version of, in which is -- i was gonna say it's word, for a word what we heard today, but it's more than that. bob woodward has more words in it about that conversation, including, it has mike pence and that conversation with donald trump, saying, i tried everything. i tried every way to try to get around this, and i couldn't find anything.
how he attempts albeit that we failed, thank goodness, but to undermine our democracy. let me add one thing. i know you know this. the department of justice doesn't need a criminal referral from anyone to charge a former president. they have the investigative resources. the legal talent to do that all on their own. i actually worry that the act of making a referral from congress to the department of justice can actually be counterproductive. meaning that it makes it somewhat less likely that the department of justice will charge a case because it looks like a political act or bending to political will. i'd much rather the congress leave the department of justice leave it alone and permit it to make its own factual judgment. >> joyce, i wanted to ask you about what we were going to see and what we'll see a version of. why would the panel want to put the former campaign manager, the
which is china's version of, say, twitter or facebook — and saying that it's a very chinese thing for nobody to rush in and intervene because historically, before domestic violence laws were introduced in 2016, it was very much the case that people just thought that this kind of behaviour was acceptable — it was a private matter between a man and a woman. and also, there is a fear in china of people being implicated in crimes, so the idea that anybody would rush in, this does not often happen. and i remember myself, when i was living in china ten years ago, i would see incidents like this of men assaulting women on the streets and you would just see crowds of bystanders not intervening whatsoever, just stood there, watching. tests are underway after possible human remains were found by police searching for a britishjournalist and a brazilian man who disappeared six days ago in the amazon rainforest. dom phillips and bruno pereira, an expert on indigenous
erupting online on platforms like sina weibo — which is china's version of, say, twitter or facebook — and saying that it's a very chinese thing for nobody to rush in and intervene because historically, before domestic violence laws were introduced in 2016, it was very much the case that people just thought that this kind of behaviour was acceptable — it was a private matter between a man and a woman. and also, there is a fear in china of people being implicated in crimes, so the idea that anybody would rush in, this does not often happen. and i remember myself when i was living in china ten years ago, i would see incidents like this of men assaulting women on the streets and you would just see crowds of bystanders not intervening whatsoever, just stood there, watching. kerry allen. tests are underway after possible human remains were found by police searching for a britishjournalist