Versus Dickerson News Today

States versus dickerson case in 2000 where the court considered whether to overturn miranda versus arizona. in that case the court, through rehnquist, specifically reaffirmed miranda, despite the fact that rehnquist had been a critic of miranda in his early daze and had written opinions critical of it. it became that -- that dickerson is similarly precedent on precede precedent, which is important going forward as you think about the calculation for a case like miranda. thats why both of those c...

2000 where the court considered whether to overturn miranda versus arizona or to reafifirm it. in that case through chief justice rehnquist specifically we affirmed miranda zbidespite fact he had been a critic of miranda in the early days and had written opinions of it quite critical. that dickerson case is similarly precedent on precedent which is important going forward as you think about the stare decisis calculation. thats why both of those cases, planned parenthood versus casey and dickerso...

Wade is an important precedent in the supreme court. its been reaffirmed many times. it was reaffirmed in planned parenthood versus casey in 1992 when the court specifically considered whether to reaffirm it or overturn it. in that detail the three justice opinion went through all the factors, analyzed those and decided to reaffirm roe. that makes casey precedent on precedent. its been relied on. casey itself has been cited as authority in subsequent cases. so that precedent on precedent is quit...