Versus Nlrb News Today

The majority in agra processors was following supreme court precedent. in shirtan case, the supreme court, a 7-2 decision, said undocumented immigrants are employees under the national labor relations act. since undocumented aliens are not among the few groups of workers expressly exempted by congress, they plainly come within the broad statutory definition of employee. thats a quote from the case. >> thats part 2a. go to part 2b. >> let me tell you people that went to both parts. everyone else ...

Flyers to all over the place to say if you need your lawn cut, call me. so lawn cutting and then the construction job, the one summer. >> my dirtiest job i ever had was four summers working in a slaughterhouse. >> yes. >> i always wanted to go back to college. >> yes. >> couldnt wait to get out of there. it was unbearable. it was dirty. it was hot. the things i did were unimaginable and i wouldnt even start to repeat them. then came a case before you called agra processor company versus nlrb. at...

Undocumented who would unionize to protect themselves in the workplace. you went out of your way to dissent all the way along and make sure they didnt, in your view, not have that right that they did not have that right to unionize. >> very respectfully disagree, senator. and the reason i disagree is the supreme court did say that the immigrant was covered under the definition of nlra. if it ends there im with you 147b 100%. then the supreme court goes on to say, the conflict between the nationa...

Immediately. judge kavanaugh, you bent over backwards to take the companys side against these workers. in a 2008 d.c. circuit case, agra processor versus nlrb, your dissent argued the companys workers should be prohibited from unionizing because they did not fit your definition of an employee. to reach this conclusion, you imported a definition of employee from a totally different statute. you ignored the plain language of the controlling statute, the national labor relations act, which has a br...