Wasnt Constitutional News Today

That perhaps we dont have a full grasp on. i think people are still somewhat undecided because the language in the report wasnt decisive, as you know. hes clearly stated he could not proceed with indicting or accusing the president, that it wasnt constitutional, but he did not exonerate him in the obstruction of justice charge. so people are still somewhat confused. i think they hear from mueller himself, that will further help create greater confidence from the american people. >> mueller made ...

Illegal, wasnt constitutional. then he came up with the march deadline. >> a lot of courts had agreed with him or getting ready to. >> what president obama did was illegal. you cannot make law from the white house. if we could, we would have funded the government but we cant. congress makes the law. the white house enforces it. so i disagree with the concept the president created an arbitrary time line. he gave congress six months and here we are bumping up against a dead line. thats not the pre...

Government and disrupt the american people because they didnt get what they wanted. well, take their crying towels and go home. >> bob, other people won elections, too, and their job is to do what the constituents want. thats what theyre doing. >> the government? >> remember, it was obama who actually made changes to the bill that wasnt constitutional. so i dont know what youre talking about. >> i know -- well, the fact of the matter is -- >> heres the thing, bob, just on top of the block which ...

Affordable care act is you have to expand medicaid coverage. more than half of the coverage happens and if they formally in the bill didnt do that then they lost all their medicaid money. >> mm-hmm. seven justices on the supreme court including justice kagan and briar joined the other five to say it wasnt constitutional, represented a gun to the head of the states and states can now take or leave the money on the table for the expansion of coverage. what does that mean in terms of how we should ...

Christian. >> thats nothing addition even if that was true, it would be a tyranny of the majority in this case. as you know, thomas jefferson and james madson -- >> dont get how -- >> james madison -- >> one judge -- >> well, were talking about the principle. i dont care what judge it is. whatever judge said this wasnt constitutional would be correct. >> i dont see how one district judge, how one district judge -- >> youre changing the subject. >> -- somehow had greater wisdom than every preside...

Belong, but it also is establishing -- you know what day of prayer this is. this is a day of prayer for christians. the idea is to import sur r surreptitiously to smuggle through customs, which is a part of your own agenda, is it not? >> christopher, this goes all the way back, as i mentioned, to george washington. the day after both chambers of congress adopted the first amendment before sending it to the people, they called for a day of prayer. they called upon george washington to declare a d...