bit ironic to hear hillary clinton talking about a president being impeached. i don t know, does that weight into the 2020 candidates? do you think this will be her way to help the campaigners? it doesn t seem they want to help. they never bring her name up on the debate stage. pete: does she think they want to help? i m pretty sure they want her money and ability to fund raise. elizabeth warren isn t going to reach back to hillary clinton and say, give me your playbook. she wasn t a good candidate to begin with. the whole idea of a corrupt tornado, is a bit ironic. human tornado is right. donald trump is a human tornado at washington, d.c., the status quo of the ruling class, the way everything is in washington. that s why people elected him. they didn t want the clinton machine. they wanted the human tornado to go into the china shop and break a bunch of stuff and expose what s going on. he speaks differently than other presidents and people want to take him one way or another
if you re looking for something sweet to give her children. i don t know, i think pelosi is against a wall and a hard place. she is getting dictation from these junior freshmen congresswomen, and she has been on the line about this. i believe that when she came forward you might have jumped the gun a little bit, because the transcript hasn t been made public now. i think the purpose of this increase because they don t have all the answers. it is a response pete: your point, people look at this from the outside and say, what answers are they still looking for? there was a whole bob mueller investigation, we dragged the whole country through it. julie: i guess they are looking for the testimony from the whistle-blower. pete: there s always something else. i need testimony, i need this transcript. and never ends. jessica: it does, because it s an abuse of power. some people think we should have another special counsel.
transcripts with several foreigs and highly classified repositories after leakers publicly divulge the contents of trumps private calls with leaders of mexico and australia. in 2017. there is exhalation to this. at the end of the day, does that was a boy does or protections? the point is that this is moving ahead in the way that it should. we publicly do not know who this individual is. this individual will likely be testifying before the senate and house intelligence committees at some point. maybe that happens in a matter of days. the point is, this is progressing as it should. and the reason there is no cover-up is because we have found out about all this, because the transcript of this call you want to call it a memorandum. the memo of this call was
kind of title that gives them a shield. gives them credibility. who are the hearsayers? who turned this information in? if you are the president of the united states, you re mad and that private phone calls with foreign leaders are making their way jessica: but it doesn t matter that there was an alleged we read the memorandum, it wasn t too transcript an alleged abuse of power by the presidency. a request for interference so i could interference in an election. pete: that s not ultimately what happened in the call. jessica: it is, actually. lisa: the justice department criminal division took a look at this and found that they didn t believe there was anything there on campaign finance violations. these are career prosecutors that took a look jessica: also didn t know lisa: we also had kenneth vogel, retreated from the new york times last night that the ukrainians were not made aware of the assistance being delayed or reviewed until one month after the call, whi