We Didnt Documents News Today

To work through. in the end, we came to a judgment about his lack of experience, that he was out of his depth, that he was contrite, and we gave him a second chance, we trusted him, and it turns out we couldnt, so i understand why i was using words that, when you look at them now, they seem wrong, but it was me trying to work out whether i could trust this man or not. you trying to work out whether i could trust this man or not.— trust this man or not. you very cuickl trust this man or not. yo...

Though because of low dyson �*s inquiry that there were other things he did. ifrankly inquiry that there were other things he did. i frankly was astonished to read low dyson �*s report saying martin bashir had not understood the gravity of what he had done because certainly, tony and others, he understood the gravity of what he had done. he understood the gravity of what he had done. , ., . , ., ,, had done. he produced these fake documents — had done. he produced these fake documents in _...

Laura kuenssberg... exactly, so why was the religious affairs editor- was the religious affairs editor allowed, a senior position in the bbc? i allowed, a senior position in the bbc? ., , y ., bbc? i am very sorry, you will have to ask... that — bbc? i am very sorry, you will have to ask... that is _ bbc? i am very sorry, you will have to ask... that is fine, _ bbc? i am very sorry, you will have to ask... that is fine, we _ bbc? i am very sorry, you will have to ask... that is fine, we are i ...

Looking back at it and in fact, i accept lord dyson �*s recommendation that of course, in the light of what earl spencer said, we should have gone back to earl spencer, one of us should have done, to pin down exactly these facts about the fake documents. i accept that as a mistake, 25 years on, but, you know, we were trying to do our best and be as rigorous as we could with what we had them but we were confronted with someone who in my 35 years at the bbc, ive not come across, basically you tr...

To staff. with hindsight, do you acce -t to staff. with hindsight, do you accept that _ to staff. with hindsight, do you accept that mr _ to staff. with hindsight, do you accept that mr should - to staff. with hindsight, do you accept that mr should have i to staff. with hindsight, do you. accept that mr should have been dealt _ accept that mr should have been dealt with as a whistle—blower? shouldnt— dealt with as a whistle—blower? shouldnt he have been treated more elaborate _ shouldnt h...

Effectively trick a mentally vulnerable woman into getting a tv interview, you can debate whether or not that had further consequences but that is the upshot of that. and your other response was to effectively blackball the person who faked up the documents and said they had done so and come clean about it. where is the morality in this? imilieu where is the morality in this? when i look back where is the morality in this? when i look back in _ where is the morality in this? when i look back in ...

Could be found to have faked documents by a senior manager, information passed on to yourself, and not face instant dismissal. it is absolutely crazed and completely against the ethos of the bbc. in the second inquiry _ against the ethos of the bbc. in the second inquiry we _ against the ethos of the bbc. in the second inquiry we examined - against the ethos of the bbc. in the second inquiry we examined why . against the ethos of the bbc. in the second inquiry we examined why he had faked those ...

Repeating yourself, cant i get back to, in that room, you could put him under— to, in that room, you could put him under a _ to, in that room, you could put him under a spotlight, stabbed to, in that room, you could put him undera spotlight, stabbed him to, in that room, you could put him under a spotlight, stabbed him with a cattle _ under a spotlight, stabbed him with a cattle prod but the fact is, that there _ a cattle prod but the fact is, that there were — a cattle prod but the fact is,...

Were trying to get an answer to. thank you. im sorry, myjawjust dropped when you set whether he was sorry or not, this is potentially described as one of the scripts of the century and it is found to have been attained through, well, lets been attained through, well, lets be honest about it, faking documents, fraudulent means, you are more concerned with whether or not hes sorry or not? absolutely priceless. hes sorry or not? absolutely priceless-— hes sorry or not? absolutely riceless. . ., ,...

Inquiry as i was suggesting to your other question, of this sort we might have now into this, it was narrowly focused on thought was the breach of editorial guidelines and had bashir can only preach them and did he understand that he had breach them and would he not do that again? and these documents were used in front of earl spencer, he was showing them, that was an offence against a street dealer guidelines but the documents never went anywhere near air, but the documents never went anywhere ...