What Kavanagh News Today

I dont know if he intended to say that but he said it. even as he repeatedly defended the judge tonight who faces three on the record female accusers and two additional allegations. they are anonymous. its hard to put weight on those the same way, but well talk about that. one of them is from 1985, one is from 1998. that makes it a little more interesting. still, anonymous. now, the latest two claims being that way, you know, you just have to look at them as not carrying that much weight, at l...

Lying to them. so now the judge has to own all of it. and if its all true, fine. if you take the three named accusers at the absolute minimum value, okay, what do we know? someone was not in church all the time. someone was seen drunk a lot for a guy who denies any excess and may have been present for far worse than just drinking. it does not make him a rapist. dont say it does. its not fair to the process. but these accounts if true in any way, a minimum standard, they mean something you may he...

Have it with me. the idea of what was done to her, she said she was incapacitated at the time. she certainly couldnt form consent. she says. but she does not identify kavanagh as her attacker, thats what im saying, and shes not saying she ever saw kavanagh attack anyone else. im asking you what do you think she could say if she were given the chance that should mean the most to senators? thats my question. >> but, chris, she does say she witnessed kavanagh conduct himself inappropriately and ver...

Change a life just through an accusation, can you? >> i dont agree with his premise at all. first of all, this is not a trial. we are not trying to convict anyone. there is not a standard of innocent until proven guilty. miss blasey ford does not have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. were not sending someone to jail here. we are trying to assess the credibility of judge kavanagh and whether he has the integrity, whether he has the honesty, whether hes trustworthy enough to be a supreme court ...

Professionally, of knowing how to ask questions and have everybody in one place with what they say about everything that matters, and then the senate could proceed. but theyre deciding not to do that. so, thank you for giving us this opportunity at least to look at julie swetnick and what she offers and what the challenges are. so, the idea of what would happen if she were to be asked about this stuff, one of the things that came up in assessing this and looking at it is theres an age differen...

Then you just add to that all these allegations, so no. whatever he says tomorrow, it will not change my view and ive already read dr. blasey fords testimony and i believe her. >> senator gillibrand, thank you for coming on this very important eve. >> thank you. thank you, chris. >> all right. also at issue tonight, four pages of a calendar from 1982. have you seen judge kavanaghs calendar? what does it show? what does it not show? next. today, 97% of employers agree that skills like teamwork, a...

Disappointed the republican party, the republican senators, this white house has not done more to do things like get the account of mark judge. get the account of mark judges girlfriend. get as much information as possible. this is really important. its a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land. there will be issues about sexual assault that will come in front of that court, and i just dont think that they have done enough to really try to get to the bottom of it. theyre going pay ...

Playing. its a con game. >> con game, con job, that was the language he used a lot. >> ive used much worse language in my life than con job. thats probably the nicest phrase ive used. it is. its a con job. >> fair point. why does he keep saying it so much? >> it is, its a con job. theyre actually con artists. its a -- they know its a big fat con job. this is a big con job. a big fat con. >> first things first. hes right. the con in con man or con job does stand for confidence, hes right about th...

This. and i dont know why the judge is standing for it, to be honest. now, trump said hell be watching tomorrow. if kavanagh is guilty, he said -- although hes not going to be found guilty or innocent or not guilty -- sure, he would withdraw his nomination. trump actually said that. if when he watches tomorrow he thinks kavanagh did it, hell withdraw the nomination. now, id like to get the over/under on that since hes already reached his verdict. this is stuff we need to talk about. it is the ...

Inappropriate sexual conduct as pled or as stated in the declaration. i think that would be a matter for state authorities in the state of maryland and we may very well do that. we may plead out a criminal complaint. but, chris, lets be clear. even if we were to do that today or last week or over the weekend, that would not change or have any impact formally on the judicial nominee process before the senate judiciary committee. >> all right. next question about this just in terms of looking at i...