Page 3 - Which Mueller News Today

No obstruction. it exonerated the president and all three of those statements are absolute allies. a great deal of collusion, obstruction of justice and it found refusal to exonerate. >> he did say definitely that he found no evidence that they were working in collaboration with russia to throw the 2016 election. he also today going back to the conflict well and seeing how conflicted mueller was. listen here. >> there is a lot of conflicts including the fact that his best friend is comey, but he...

And its fairly close so youll be able to watch. the president sitting in the oval office as was meeting with the prime minister, imran khan, insisting he will not set their clue to the screen. >> i will not be watching mueller because you cant take all those bites out of the apple. we had no collusion, no obstruction, we had no nothing. we had a total no collusion finding. the democrats were devastated. they went crazy. they went off the deep end. >> he said there was no collusion and no obstruc...

Adam schiff. their joint statement tonight says "pursuant to subpoenas issued by house judiciary and house intelligence, special counsel mueller has agreed to testify before both committees. " we have only seen one of the subpoenas before in which mueller is commanded to appear before the committee. now, we know from talking to congressman schiff that muellers agreement is that he will testify at each committee, at judiciary and at intelligence. and interestingly after open session testimony fro...

Impeachment inquiry into president trump. from the moment of his inauguration, this president has shown contempt for the truth, has attacked our institutions, and has ignored the constitution he swore to defend. >> heres the math. 76 democrats, there they all are, now say they support an impeachment inquiry or proceedings and one republican, justin amash of michigan. but to be clear, the democrats backing impeachment represent 32% of all the democrats in the house, still less than a mathematical...

Impeachment inquiry into president trump. from the moment of his inauguration, this president has shown contempt for the truth, has attacked our institutions, and has ignored the constitution he swore to defend. >> heres the math. 76 democrats, there they all are, now say they support an impeachment inquiry or proceedings and one republican, justin amash of michigan. but to be clear, the democrats backing impeachment represent 32% of all the democrats in the house, still less than a mathematical...

Impeachment inquiry into president trump. from the moment of his inauguration, this president has shown contempt for the truth, has attacked our institutions, and has ignored the constitution he swore to defend. >> heres the math. 76 democrats, there they all are, now say they support an impeachment inquiry or proceedings and one republican, justin amash of michigan. but to be clear, the democrats backing impeachment represent 32% of all the democrats in the house, still less than a mathematical...

Mueller investigated potential obstruction of justice and when william barr and rod rosenstein were given the fact they made the decision, there is no section of justice. it was investigated for over two years and when the assistant ag made the point of no section there is no instruction of justice. >> it with a similar tone to what we heard a couple years ago and what weve been hearing over the course of the last 2 and half years. hes been on point with his messaging, it really hasnt changed mu...

>> lets discuss with natasha bertrand, national political correspondent with politico and msnbc contributor and mike isikoff, chief correspondent with yahoo! news. big welcome to you both. we had several democrats interpret this statement by bob mueller to mean he was referring to impeachment to congress. is that fair, michael, or are democrats overinterpreting? >> clearly the line that you just played in which mueller said the constitution has other mechanisms for holding a president accountabl...

An impeachment inquiry into president trump. not because they want to. house speaker nancy pelosi has been blunt and consistent and insistent in making sure she would frankly rather stick a fork in her eye, but now we know that what congress didnt fully appreciate when they all initially cheered the appointment of robert mueller, when they praised him personally, when they praised the decision of the justice department to appoint a special counsel to look into this matter, what i think congress ...

Inability either to clear the president of a crime, since there was so much evidence of his criminality and like wise inability to charge him because they were barred by department of justice policy. ultimately, his appearance before the cameras represented a kind of passing of the constitutional baton from muellers office to congress, which mueller noted pointedly has the ability to formally accuse the president of wrongdoing. >> as set forth notice report after that investigation, if we had ha...