facets of this case that deserve question. why was there i think he was 17 or 18 years old. 18, thank you and how does that person get put into the ninth grade? why i mean there are so many issues that come up in this case. i will leave it to authorities to get through, but i think we are in the early stages in this and there is a lot that needs to be addressed with respect to this case in particular. hear you about it being a state issue. let s talk about something the president has implemented and used his voice is voice, victims of immigration crime enforcement. is that enough? no. it sne piece. the president understands that victims need a voice, which is why he rabrought it to them. i think part of the reason president has made illegal immigration and crackdown such a big deal is because of tragedies like this. we ask when we hear about this, why isn t the president dealing with because of this priority?
i think part of the reason president has made illegal immigration and crackdown such a big deal is because of tragedies like this. we ask when we hear about this, why isn t the president dealing with because of this priority? part of the reason is because the tragedy that this young girl dealt with, had inflicted upon her. whatever the word is. this is why he is passionate about this, because people are victims of these crimes in terms of them, they are victims of the economic piece of it. there is a national security piece. but immigration pays its toll on our people if it s not don done legally. this is another reason why the president is passionate about it. it s multiple facetted. why i just read off that this executive order is dealing with people who committed crimes who local enforcement agency or municipal palities at the state level are not dealing with it. if you go to i.c.e. website and
and i think that you having particular experience in this area more than most would understand that this kind of information being available, being vulnerable to hacking, is extremely dangerous to us, and needs to be more protected. what is the status of all of this? this has been a continual problem. you mentioned this week s release by wikileaks included 8,000 documentss they purport to include information about very classified and sensitive cia hack abilities. and it comes on the heels of 7 years now worth of high-profile unauthorized disclosures, leaks or hacks either sensitive or classified information that the government retains. judge jeanine: why isn t the
you re akwequating me with a tweet thank you you ve asked your question, thank you. does that not diminish the language that you re using? go ahead. by republicans was his executive use of orders, and the president signed three more today, why isn t that criticism applicable to president trump when you look at the context what those executive orders did, not even democrats i don t believe would most have been widely praised by both parties. most was widely praised. the president stretched orders
she has made it very clear over and over again. yea yeah? your answer about the context doesn t make sense when you think about what senator ben fasta said today on tv. he said he asked judge gorsuch specifically about the president s so called judge tweet and in response this is like the fourth time i have answered it. this is a different context. i understand that. i have said exactly what the senator said about it. i understand. thank you. i m going to continue on this line despite what s happening here. why isn t the white house, why isn t the president concerned about the influence or the appearance of the influence on the independent judiciary? why season he he is tree to speak his mind. where is this outrage been through the last 100 years? i m talking about this president. part of the reason the president got elected is because