Wouldnt G News Today

I think atlas chance that they might decide theyre not really interested in delving into this dispute in great depth >> in which case it wouldnt g above the level it is now. if the supreme court decides not review it. >> thats right. >> josh, i didnt mean to step on you there >> thats okay. >> thank you for joining us. i appreciate your reporting at politico.com >> anytime, rachel take care. >> appreciate you being here well be right back, stay with us beep goes off ]

I think they knew that would be horrific for them. i wouldnt take one pundits side on this. thats why we have an im martial cbo. >> thats what were waiting on, to see what that score means, where folks will fall. the initial reaction is making it seem as if its going to be worse when it comes to premium, what folks are going to be covered for. but republicans are now on the record, at least on the house side on this. we know senate republicans as well as democrats are looking to go back to squar...

The egyptians, israelis, german, brits. >> im talking about president obamas sanctions on russia and those being lifted under a trump administration and as general flynn was representing the administration in the transition of national security, speaking to kislyak about raising those sanctions and then lying to vice president pence, do you find that to beny act of espionage or treason? >> i wouldnt g to espionage or treason. i think it would be ill advised for an incoming national security advi...

>> exactly. very quickly, jordan, what would you have happen to this law as you try to get to the supreme court? >> were trying to protect the conscience rights, engrand rights in our constitution. well get an opinion likely in june. there are other challenges to the provisions of the law. the law clearly said you wouldnt g any of the subsidies, thus you wouldnt be penalized. does the letter of the law stand? d.c. federal judge who will at least hear the argument come february. legal challenges ...

Latest updates on this topic.