Page 65 - Wrapping News Today

Explaining it but say it was so complex and so focused i dont understand so the judge is like thats the point, right? >> right. >> so her discussions about why it was material are actually really interesting, but mueller isnt saying that. mueller has been silent about what that august 2nd, 2016 meeting is. we know its central to the investigation. he just isnt going to tell us what it means. >> and theres -- the last question i guess is what -- i mean there has been so much about when its going ...

Polling data and giving it to him and the idea that manaforts own lawyers are copping to the fact that what they gave him was like a big hefty chuck of whatever it was. >> and i mean his lawyers also say, i mean they kind of go back and forth on how theyre explaining it but say it was so complex and so focused i dont understand so the judge is like thats the point, right? >> right. >> so her discussions about why it was material are actually really interesting, but mueller isnt saying that. muel...

Living off the proceeds of larry, why get rid of him 234. >> larry was lisas golden goose was lisa was sarahs golden goose. and sarah was about to be cut out of this whole triangle. larry had just told her two days before he was killed that, you know, he wanted her gone, he wanted her fired. >> so said testa, it was sarah who had the motive to kill larry. sarahs lawyer, of course, saw it differently. >> this seems like a classic instance of, you know, evil sort of wrapping around a sweet, young....

Release derogatory information about people who arent going to be indicted. but because the doj has a policy that the president cant be indicted, should that change how this is handled? >> thats an excellent point, don, and i think it very well might. because in a typical situation there is a privacy interest of someone who the doj had a chance to indict and decided not to. as you note, doj has long maintained that the president is constitutionally immune to indictment. hes not immune, of course...

As you note the doj has long maintained that the president is constitutionally immune to indictment. hes not immune, of course, to impeachment. and to the extent that is something if indictment is not on the table then impeachment has to be at least theoretically on the table. and therefore there is far more than in the usual situation, a public interest in learning information, derogatory information about someone who even though that person is not going to be indicted by doj. >> garret, for as...

Wrapping because were hearing that theres going to be a report from robert mueller. what law hear is were finishing act two of a three-act play and now were moving to the third act. theres not a wrap. theres a trial. there may be nor indictments and theres the continuing investigations happening out of the u.s. attorneys offices which are a continuation of the mueller probe, even if theyre not called the mueller probe and what we heard and learned yesterday from nicole wallace, from the andrew m...

Theres a -- journalists will say this is wrapping because were hearing that theres going to be a report from robert mueller. what lawyers hear is this is at -- were finishing act 2 of a three-act play and now were moving into the third act. its not because its over. theres not a wrap. there are -- theres a trial. there may be more indictments. and theres the continuing investigations happening out of the u.s. attorneys offices, which are a continuation of the mueller probe even if theyre not cal...

Could cause people to look at the president in a different way. michael cohen could do that and whatever mueller ultimately comes up with could do that. >> is there any reason to believe that mueller would drop this report at a certain time because everything that we have learned about bob mueller is he is very much by the book. if he is allowing this report to be finalized on wednesday, its not because of the fact that the president is abroad but because of the fact that hes done. so what indic...

>> of course. and you know why black folk and gay folk say that, because -- >> there are real victims of -- >> well, because there are real victims of homophobia and of racism, but also because unfortunately we tend to all be painted with the same brush when one person does wrong. and thats why we always say that when something goes wrong, is we hope the person is not black. we hope the person is not gay. >> yeah. theyve been wrapping me for about ten minutes now, and i just am going on. again, ...

And you know why black folk and gay folk say that, because -- >> there are real victims of -- >> well, because there are real victims of homophobia and of racism, but also because unfortunately we tend to all be painted with the same brush when one person does wrong. and thats why we always say that when something goes wrong, is we hope the person is not black. we hope the person is not gay. >> yeah. theyve been wrapping me for about ten minutes now, and i just am going on. again, like any other...