Zipit Wireless Inc News Today

Precedential Decisions - Penumbra, Inc. v. RapidPulse, Inc., IPR2021-01466, Paper 34 (March 10, 2023) (designated: November 15, 2023) (regarding prior art status under...

A little over halfway through 2023, and nearing the end of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB’s) fiscal year, we can take stock of an administrative body that is settling into a decade of precedent while big changes still loom.

This recurring feature highlights any new PTAB precedential and/or informative decisions, any new substantive Director review decisions, and any new substantive decisions issued by the...

2022 was a milestone year for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. In April, Kathi Vidal began her tenure as Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office with an early focus...

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) maintains a list of all PTAB precedential and informative decisions organized by subject matter. These precedential decisions...

Director Vidal’s sua sponte Director Review decision of Apple Inc. v. Zipit Wireless, Inc. (IPR2021-01124, -01125, -01126, -01129) was recently designated as precedential. The decision ...

When I first started practicing law, I worked on a wide range of technologies in district court proceedings. I then spent a decade working for the government doing appellate work. Since coming...

In Apple v. Zipit Wireless, the Director of the USPTO initiated a sua sponte review of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s adverse judgments in multiple inter partes review proceedings. The PTO Director ordered judgments be vacated and remanded for further consideration.

A weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent...

Apple v. Zipit Wireles Patent Trial and Appeal Board inter partes review IPR decision a small win for patent owners because it appears to clarify that patent owners have the choice of not formally participating in an IPR, which can save them money in protracted Litigation