vimarsana.com

பாதுகாப்பு உளவுத்துறை விமர்சனம் குழு News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Abbotsford MP and UFV philosophy professor weigh in on pros and cons of proposed Anti-terrorism Act

Print Edition: March 25, 2015 Bill C-51, the proposed Anti-terrorism Act, has been criticized by its opponents as unconstitutional since it was first introduced and read at the House of Commons on January 30. The Conservative Party of Canada calls the bill an extension of existing legislation like the Combatting Terrorism Act and the Nuclear Terrorism Act, and is a step towards better countering terrorist threats. However, the bill is criticized for its use of the phrase “terrorism in general,” which opponents argue is too vague, therefore allowing for a possibly unfair interpretation of what is deemed terrorist activity. In the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives’ magazine 

How the FBI Created Domestic Terrorism: 80 Years of Psychological Warfare Revealed

How the FBI Created Domestic Terrorism: 80 Years of Psychological Warfare Revealed The “war on terror” is now expanding to target a broad spectrum of the American population who would be morally resistant to the sorts of anti-human policies demanded by Great Reset Technocrats, Matthew Ehret writes. Since it has become increasingly evident that a vast extension of the Patriot Act will soon be unveiled that threatens to re-define “the war on terror” to include essentially anyone who disagrees with the governing neoliberal agenda, it is probably a good time to evaluate how and why terrorism – domestic or otherwise – has tended to arise over the past century.

Matthew Ehret: How the FBI created domestic terrorism through 80 years of psychological warfare -- Secret History -- Sott net

© The Washington Post The war on terror is now expanding to target a broad spectrum of the American population who would be morally resistant to the sorts of anti-human policies demanded by Great Reset Technocrats. Since it has become increasingly evident that a vast extension of the Patriot Act will soon be unveiled that threatens to re-define the war on terror to include essentially anyone who disagrees with the governing neoliberal agenda, it is probably a good time to evaluate how and why terrorism - domestic or otherwise - has tended to arise over the past century. If, in the course of conducting this evaluation, we find that terrorism is truly a naturally occurring phenomenon , then perhaps we might conclude alongside many eminent figures of the intelligence community and Big Tech, that new pre-emptive legislation targeting the rise of a new conservative-minded domestic terrorist movement is somehow necessary. Maybe the censoring of free speech, and the surveillance of

Front Man | The Walrus

Front Man Grant Bristow kept silent for almost ten years about his controversial work as a CSIS spy in Canada’s neo-Nazi movement. Now, finally, he’s ready to tell his side of the story October 31, 2019 - by Andrew MitrovicaAndrew Mitrovica Updated 13:49, Oct. 31, 2019 | Published 4:22, Sep. 12, 2004This article was published over a year ago. Some information may no longer be current. THE INSTANT Grant Bristow answered the telephone on Friday morning, August 12, 1994, the new, sedate life he had built in a bland Toronto suburb for himself, his wife, and son began to unravel. For six years, Bristow had inhabited the perilous universe of white supremacists as a mole for the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (csis).

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.