The Supreme Court has barred all courts from taking up contempt petitions against the Employees Provident Fund Organization(EPFO) and the Central Government seeking the implementation of judgments.
The Supreme Court observed that the provisions of Order VII Rue 11 [Rejection of Plaint] are not exhaustive and the Court has the inherent power to see that frivolous or vexatious litigations are not.
The Supreme Court on Monday sought a response from Future Retail Limited (FRL) in a plea by e-commerce giant Amazon challenging the Delhi High Court order which had stayed the implementation of status quo direction passed by single-judge of the High Court with respect to the $3.4 billion Future-Reliance deal. A bench headed by Justice Rohinton Nariman also said that while the proceedings before National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) can go on, they should not culminate in any final order of sanction of the scheme. “Issue notice. Dasti in addition. To come up after three weeks. Rejoinder to be filed two weeks thereafter. List thereafter,” the court ordered, according to law platform Bar & Bench. “Meanwhile, the NCLT proceedings will be allowed to go on but will not culminate in any final order of sanction of scheme.”
CBI Probe In WB Coal Mining Scam : Supreme Court To Examine Whether Order Of Calcutta HC Single Bench In Criminal Matter Appealable Before DB, Issues Notice livelaw.in - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from livelaw.in Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.