The europeans themselves. Many say that europe has lost sovereignty, say, in the economic locomotive of europe, in a federal republic, but leading politicians have repeatedly emphasized that after 1945 germany was never in the full sense of the word a sovereign state, which is what this leads to in practice , including economic life, they provoked the United States, and i think that i have no doubt that they provoked the ukrainian crisis when they supported the coup in ukraine in 1414, they could not help but understand that this was a red line, we said this a thousand times , no, they climbed, well, we got todays situation, and i suspect that it is no coincidence that they needed this conflict, the result that europe, which had long ago lost part, well, not completely, but a significant part of its sovereignty, was forced to immediately stand behind its sovereign and she was forced to follow his policy and switch to a policy of sanctions and restrictions in relations with russia, realizing that this was to her detriment, and now all Energy Resources, a significant part of them, are purchased from the United States. 30 more expensive, which means they introduced restrictions on russian oil, but what the result is, its not as obvious as for gas, but the result is the same, they reduced the number of suppliers, and we, in turn, began to buy a reduced number of suppliers at higher prices. And we sell our oil to others states at a discount, you know what happened, the competitiveness of the european economy fell down, and the competitiveness of their main, in fact from the point of view of the economic component of the competitors of the United States, increased sharply and other countries, including also increased, with their own hands, as a result of the loss , losing part of their sovereignty, they were forced to make decisions with their own hands to their own detriment, but why do we need such a partner, of course, he is not useless, but i want to draw attention to the fact that we are leaving the fading European Market, increasing our presence in growing markets in other regions of the world, including asia, at the same time, of course, we are connected with europe by numerous, centuriesold ties in the field of culture, education, i repeat, everything it is based on christian culture. But even here the europeans do not make us very happy, they are destroying their roots, based on christian culture, they are simply tearing them out, mercilessly, therefore, we are not going to close anything, neither windows nor doors, but we are not going to break in there. V europe, if europe doesnt want this, it wants it, please, we will work together, please, but, well, it seems to me, well. We can talk endlessly, but in my opinion i noted the main points. Now, regarding the textbook and the Color Revolutions of 1956, i will not hide that i did not read the textbook in this part. And regarding the withdrawal of troops, of course, these are also historical facts, then in 1956, many western countries. Fueled the problems that were taking place, including the mistakes of the then the hungarian leadership, they trained and trained militants abroad, and transferred them to hungary , but in my opinion, its still difficult to call it some kind of Color Revolution in its pure form, because there were, of course, an internal basis a serious. Like a protest within the country itself, this is, in my opinion, an obvious thing, as far as it goes, and then it is hardly necessary to transfer todays, uh, todays formulations to the middle of the last century. And as for the withdrawal of troops, i am deeply convinced that there is no point in using troops. To suppress internal tendencies in a particular country among the people to achieve those goals that they consider priority for themselves. This applies to European Countries and eastern European Countries as well. But there was no point in keeping troops there if, if, if the people of these countries. They didnt want to see them on their territory, but how it happened, on what conditions it all happened , in what way, this of course raises many questions, but our troops went straight into an open field, how many, how many people know about this, just in an open field, with families, this normal, at the same time, no matter what. The consequences of the withdrawal of these troops were also not formulated by either the soviet or russian leadership, the western partners did not undertake any obligations at all, but at least returned to the issue of expanding or not expanding nato to the east , yes, everything was promised, our American Partners do not deny this verbally. And then we all the time where is the piece of paper . No piece of paper, thats it, goodbye, they promised, well, it seems like they promised, but its worth nothing, we know that a piece of paper is worth nothing to them, theyll take any piece of paper we are ready to choose, but at least we fixed something on paper, and during the withdrawal of troops we could coordinate, coordinate issues of ensuring security in europe, achieve some kind of new structure in europe, with the same german social democracy, mr. Bar, ego naar, had proposals, i already spoke about this once, to create a new Security System in europe, which would include russia, and the same United States, and the same canada, but not nato, but together with everyone, for eastern and central europe, in my opinion, this would be solved many of todays problems. And then he said, the grandfather was smart, he said exactly what he said, otherwise you will see, everything will be the same, only closer to russia, the german politician, an experienced, competent and intelligent person , no one listened to him, not even the soviet leadership, and even more so in the west and in the United States, well, now we have what he, what he said, you know, so the conclusion. It was pointless to keep the troops, yes, but the conditions for the withdrawal, thats what we had to talk about for sure, and achieve the creation of a situation that could would not have led to todays tragedies and to todays crisis, so, well, perhaps thats all, yes, i answered your questions, if i forgot something, please, thank you, since they started talking about germany, that germany. I would like to talk about what you just mentioned, about the special military operation in ukraine, they often say that this is an antifascist operation, that it is necessary to liberate the people of ukraine from the nazis, and it is necessary to liberate the country and so on, and against this background it is not entirely its clear how this can be, it turns out that we we maintain contacts at a high level, we maintain contacts between parliaments. We also have parties that are deeply russian in their essence and of course , they have no sympathy for the russian people, they do not understand at all that russia is a multinational country, as was already said in your speech, thats what i would like to understand, on what you expect, what yours expects. Do you understand that antifascism in europe also does not support your policies, the european antifascist movement does not support the russian one, sorry, please, i would like to ask you, i would like to ask you to specify what you mean when you say profascist forces and profascist parties. About their attitude towards russia and so on, please, be directly specific, otherwise we will speak in half, or better yet directly, the heads of the tificial official meeting with foreign minister lavrov in 2020, and it was an official meeting, part of it is essentially based on fascist antifascists in germany do not quite understand the meaning of such contacts and do not understand the meaning of russian politics in relation to, please excuse me, what do you see, what do you see, this is what confirms what you said , that they are based in their activities on some kind of fascist, profascist, National Socialist ideas, thats it can you tell me specifically what its about . For example, he is directly connected with the fascists, he regularly goes to demonstrations in dreston, on the anniversary of the events, and he goes out together with the fascists, this is a representative of the alternative for Germany Party directly connected with the nazi fascist movement, and this is often talked about, he does not hide the fact that it is a rightwing party. I see, so look, you started with ukraine and asked me. Is it fair that we publicly declare that we are striving for denazification of the ukrainian political system . Well, we just discussed the situation that developed in the canadian parliament, when the president of ukraine stood and applauded the nazi who killed jews, russian poles, isnt this a sign that ukraine has developed. A system that we have the right to call paranazi, the leader the state stands and applauds a nazi and not just some ideological follower of nazism, but a real nazi, a former ss soldier. Isnt this a sign of the nazification of ukraine, and doesnt this give us the right to talk about its denazification, but you can answer, yes. This is the head of state, but this is not the whole country, but ill tell you, you said about those who go to rallies together with profascist elements, but is this the whole party that goes to these rallies, probably not, thats all that we are certainly profascist, pronazi is condemned, everything that is devoid of these, well, these signs on the contrary, is aimed at establishing some kind of contacts; we support , as far as i know, an attempt was made on one of the leaders, and alternatives for germany, a federal republic, are only now during the Election Campaign , the Election Campaign, this says something, that representatives of this party use nazi methods, or these nazi methods are used against them, because this is a question that is painstakingly awaiting its solution. Investigator, including in your person , in the person of the general public of the federal republic itself, but as for the antifascist forces, we have always been with them, we know their position towards russia, we are grateful for this position, and we certainly support it, i think , that everything that is aimed at reviving, at maintaining relations between us must. Be supported, and this certainly can be the light at the end of the tunnel of our current relations. Thank you, alexey grevach, right there in the back, thank you for the opportunity to ask a question, he is like that too is of a research nature, we are working on the latest events in the gas sector, here. Exactly a year ago, well, a little more, we all witnessed an incredible act, an unprecedented act of International Terrorism against critical crossborder european infrastructure, i mean the explosions of northern threads, and you have commented a lot on this topic, including the monumental negligence of europeans. Investigators of political figures in assessing this situation, we can say brilliantly, we see a brilliant absence of any clear reactions of condemnation of this fact on the part of the leadership, for example, chancellor scholz or president macron, although the companies of these countries, one might say, directly suffered from these actions, since they were and are shareholders of these projects, but at the same time, numerous plums who are directly or indirectly trying to assign blame, supposedly the investigation comes to such conclusions that ukrainian comrades are behind these acts, in this regard , i have two questions for you, the first is whether there was any reaction from these gentlemen political figures of your european counterparts in some direct contacts, and not in official speeches, which were not , in my opinion, or through what is called diplomatic channels, the second question is, what can and will be the consequences if the so called european investigation , the investigative authorities of European Countries will still assign blame for this. For these events, actions on the ukrainian side. The first thing i would like to point out is that long before this explosion, the president of the United States publicly said that the United States will do everything to ensure that Russian Energy supplies to europe through these pipeline systems are stopped. And he smiled so meaningfully and said now i wont say how it will be done, but we will do it, first, second, the destruction of these infrastructure facilities is certainly an act of International Terrorism, third we are not allowed to participate in the investigation, despite our proposals and repeated calls. Do it. Further, there are no results of investigations, and , apparently, there will not be any. And finally, in the answer to answer the question of who is to blame, you always need to answer the question, who is interested in this . Of course, the american supplier of Energy Resources to the European Market is interested. This no longer has any meaning, but there is another component of this whole problem, of course, if it is ever revealed who did this, it must be brought to justice, this is an act of International Terrorism, but one remains, nord stream 2, it is not damaged , it can supply 27. 5 billion cubic meters of gas to europe. This is just a decision. Government federal republic of germany, nothing else is needed, today is the decision, tomorrow we turn everything on and the gas is flowing, but they dont do this, because, as we say, the Washington Regional Committee does not allow it to the detriment of its own interests, we continue supply gas to europe. Through turkish flows, and apparently, ukrainian terrorist groups are aimed at causing damage to him, there our ships are guarding, these pipeline systems laid along the bottom of the black sea, but they are trying to attack them constantly, with the help of drones , which are being prepared, including with the direct participation of English Speaking specialists and advisers, we hear this on the air, where these unmanned semipropelled boats are being prepared, we hear english speech, this is for us, this is an obvious fact , whoever ends up doing this, well, draw your own conclusions, but they just continue , including through the territory of ukraine, we transit through the territory of ukraine, and we pay money for this transit, so just a minute, here we are a lot, i already talked about this, we hear that we are aggressors, that we are so bad, but the money, apparently, does not smell, the money receives transit, they are happy to cash out all this, um. And thats it, thats why we behave openly, transparently, we are ready to cooperate, but they dont want to, we dont need to, we will increase the amount of liquefied natural gas produced and sold, we will, we will, send it to other markets, we will build new pipelines systems, yes, where they want to see our product, where it is absolutely competitive and raises the competitiveness of the economies of those countries, i have already spoken about this, where they receive our products, but as for the investigation , well see, well, in the end, its impossible to hide the shitty bags, as our people say, in the end it will still be its clear who did this, you yourself mentioned about transit through ukraine, so. Part of our public is perplexed, but why are we doing this, this money, so why are we paying them . We pay money because this is a transit country, and we deliver transit through ukraine, uh, only because we are fulfilling our contractual obligations to our counterparties in europe , well, this strengthens the defense capability of our enemy, well, it also strengthens. Our financial condition, we get money for this, of course, thank you, taxane has been a long time coming, thank you, its a great honor and a great opportunity to hear your speech, i would like to switch to the middle east, to move away from the topic of the International System of ukraine. From iraq and the Prime Minister of iraq will soon visit moscow and i thank you for receiving him personally, now there are numerous problems associated with our country, we have oil growth and gazprom working, they have invested large sums in iraq in kurdistan, in particular, do you think that now there is. A peaceful solution and peaceful resolution of all the problems that currently exist, since there are other countries in the region that would like, for example, on the contrary, they would like to escalate the conflict, they would like to add fuel to the fire, now i would also like to say that by the end of twenty we have already reached the third year and. Dont you think that the time has come to personally help all the countries in conflict in syria, including talking with the government and with the kurds, with regional forces, all regional parties, to finally put an end to this conflict. Thousands of syrians have left their homes, they are being humiliated and a peaceful solution to the conflict is not yet visible on the horizon, and i think that no one except you can do this now, most of the parties to the conflict respect russia, respect president putin, you have very good relations with them, i think the time has already come. You just said that even the parties to the conflict in some states of the middle east, including syria , respect us, treat us with respect, i can tell you, this is because we ourselves treat everyone with respect, and, as far as syria is concerned, we are, we are supporters of the peace process, including the subgids. The auspices of the united nations, but we cannot replace the contracting parties, we can only create conditions, to a certain extent, if it is acceptable for everyone, to act as guarantors of these agreements, including with the participation of our direct partners in this process, i mean iran and turkey, within the framework of the ostanino process, we did this, all this and. Had positive consequences and now everything , what has been achieved, and thank god a lot has been achieved, meaning first of all a ceasefire and conditions have been created for the peace process, all this was done by us, our partners, with the good will, with the good will of the syrian leadership, but o