Im jane spays in munich where World Leaders gathered for the 56 security conference among them the palestinian Prime MinisterMohammad Shtayyeh u. S. President double trump describes his middle east plan as the deal of the century the palestinians call the map of territory theyve been offered squeeze cheese rather than a solution for a sovereign palestinian state so what now will explore all of this as the palestinian Prime Minister mohammed style talks to aljazeera. Mohammed style palestinian Prime Minister thank you for talking to aljazeera you know where im going to start im going to start with the trump plan what the president of the us called the deal of the century he talked about it 1st 3 years ago and ive been speaking to diplomats and to prominent palestinians they all told me they thought it probably was never going to see the light of day. But did can i ask you what your thoughts were and your feelings when you saw that document for the 1st time well. It was really an insult for everybody where this sort of very long fight for freedom and independence and a sub. On the borders of success which we want to as a big compromise sort of this sort of bank about there was only 6000. 00. 6000 kilometer square out of was brazil to be shrinking youll get a free where that does not give us more than 11 percent of what by this time used to be so the blonde has been designed in a way language and ext. Is 100 votes on israeli proposals even the language that is used we have here a bid from israeli negotiators dori gold the director general of the Israeli Ministry of foreign of was on hard saying that he was bought into the plan he advised them on language and some song so the plan or what they call the proposal i think it did really erode every possibility for peace between palestinians and israelis he just had to listen to Prime Minister netanyahu in the white house he was thanking everyone he seemed absolutely delighted this is just what the right wing in israel of always wanted and if you look at any other plan every other plan since 948 this gives the palestinians less territory than any of them while the question is why did nothing accept the plan upfront nobody has claimed to have seen the plan if netanyahu was not the coauthor of the land then he could have said well give us the time to study it. Immediately accepted without and it is a version of the plan because it is his plan one secondly or the american proposals really was trying to redesign the whole of the terms of reference for the Peace Process in accordance with american understanding of the conflict there is no way that im not a comparable result canterburys International Law there is no way that american proposal place United Nations resolutions since the early days of the conflict the proposals after proposals they have failed really to come up to a solution because of this sort of us bias of the United States thought of israel which is something they dont deny because its what i had united browed to say that we are instructed you to lions with israel and we care about israels. Youre ready about israels future about about so if you have a party that is supposed to be a 3rd party that is supposed to be an honest broker that is supposed to be an object of many years and then 100 percent informed by us taken measures that is not the proposal they should that they bought that has to do with the United States was implemented even before the proposal was launched that exception of jerusalem the movement of the embassy freezing Financial Aid to another one there by the scene or one of the oldies unilateral measures that have been taken by the United States it does show that the start of the g 4 the americans was to fully and totally voted by the scene and back so the war squeeze them that defeat them so they surrender so they accept President Trump is someone who sees many things in money terms one of the main things the administration is pointing out is that youre going to get a lot of money they say an economic boost of 50000000000. 00 thats a huge figure not really. 35000000000 of these supposed to be loans and the rest of it is grants on conditional bases and so on look this is sort of wrong to deal with the palestinians that palestinians are ready to trade politics for money and he is wrong by the seniors have learned one thing from where jesus christ was born in bethlehem its not with bread ones live only by the seen as they have their dignity and freedom which is more important than a loaf of bread so to try to buy jerusalem for money or and or turn of some assistance or a shrinking but is seen in geography or subordinate the or a right of return to refugees or all of these sort of things and return of the a bunch of dollars this is not what their policies are looking for a stable it brings money and money does not. Bring stability lets compare this plan with what was the International Consensus since the oslo accords let me quote the un the vision of 2 States Israel and palestine living side by side in peace and security on the basis of the pre 1967 lines with jerusalem as the capital of both states lets take those things one by one 1st a palestinian state is this a viable state you can office not 1st of all there is no offer for a bus he knows that and the proposal there is an interstate and that entity is not certain and that is entity is not contiguous and that indeed the it does shut out of the whole palestinian into zones of of control of that is not connected and youre going to live in where years of those the president said it was a swiss cheese it is not it is this was jews where we are the horrors of this was jesus taught that it is connected from each other so that is not as the 2nd the american speaks about but it stands have to qualify for about state after 40 years while it does given up any our immediate action today it does give us 40 years took what he 5 for that sort of entity and it didnt put for conditions for that indeed to materialize one that we recognize is that i as a jewish state 2nd we demilitarize gaza and would draw weapons from hamas and so on and thirdly we have to be good guys the question is whos going to see with their way out of wood or bad theyre israelis and the worst part of the story where fully and daughterly the proposal gives all of your was an end to the israelis and not only that it does dig the whole issue of refugees out of the blue going to sort of the problem if you dont handle the issue of refugees where there are 7000000 palestinians living and if you do comes and their support if you dont. That it will be it is us that last point i want to mention to you on that but its dinners in that region have become is their billions is their billing factor look nobody is the man is a member of isis nobody seen as a member of al qaida nobody seen as a member of any terrorist organization and so on and that is very important for the International Community to understand that by listing the us to be their billing factor in the region let me pick up some of the points youve raised there the proposed capital for this palestinian state they say it will be a palestinian state they talk of something called eastern jerusalem this seems to be the other side of the wall that israel built so its not really East Jerusalem its east of jerusalem is that your understanding its worse than that you see that here is about language they try to fool some listeners to say that with its capital in jerusalem any innocent naive politician might understand that own proposal is giving but if he has to have a capital in jerusalem for us the issue is not about the injuries on him for us the issue is that you share rose and him is that cabinet and not not abu dis which is that what theyre offering you there is a big difference between saying with the euro zone as its capital or with its capital in jerusalem because there was a name has 2 sides there is the city of jerusalem which is only 6 square kilometers which is the old city and the holy bhasin and that is where we consider East Jerusalem is the city always euro zone and then you have the governor mitt of jerusalem which includes the villages around the city of jerusalem so when he said its got to tell in eastern jerusalem is that if it into one of the little tiny villages which is outside the ward city the 6 kilometers or euro zone m. Is an. Has been expanded by is that i had to become 65 kilometers and what the americans are proposing that this but is seen in the capital will be even outside the warrant bottle of jerusalem which is in one and the worst bought or so is when they said you can choose anywhere and put it puts you know you name any city or any billet and you call it this is that accords this is totally stupid naive proposal that does not fool anybody but as soon as our body that for us East Jerusalem is the city of jerusalem let me ask you about another of those issues you raised which is the refugees refugees who fled in the wars in 1967 who went to lebanon to syria to jordan there is no right of return in this plan that is on offer that i assume makes this a regional problem it is because when you are speaking i want rehabilitation oh but as you know refugees in lebanon and syria and jordan and other bases its not only about demography its its again these palestinians who have been that are with the keys and their hands of the houses that they have been pushed out over since 948. 00 they have these skis as a symbol of the hope that there will return them or there will be a just solution for their cause when this solution the american out of proposing is that we have a vision over a few days and the host countries 1st of all are the host countries dont accept 2nd that if you dont accept and thirdly we dont accept their want just to push the problem away from their borders keep it a lebanese problem create a syrian problem create a jordanian problem which we dont accept and without his why they couldnt with all the pressure they exerted on jordan which i said you would him and legally bennys and the syrians and all nobody has accepted this american proposal it is a be that if you g. s because the whole i. Of refugees is that they should there has to be a just solution and jordan has bought into it lieberman has bought into it syria has bought into it egypt is bought to do it that is where the bullets end if you g. s r. And so therefore just simply to say as if you out of solving the territorial problem with a look at but is seen as in the west bank and gaza this does not sort of the but is seen and problem when the plan was unveiled in the white house 2 leaders came from the middle east the problem was they were both israelis now mr Kushner Jared cushion of the president s son in law who did the negotiation says thats your fault because you didnt take part in the negotiations he now says as you mentioned you have 4 years that you could start negotiations with him and he says and these are his far from diplomatic words if they dont then theyre going to screw up another opportunity like theyve screwed up every opportunity that theyve ever had in their existence whats your reaction while that this sort of slogan you know that somebody is the means never missed an abortion or to thomas an abortion if this is that money was made by about you ban in 169 yes and i dont buy that because we seized every a portrait we were out of we did a huge compromise to accept the fact that we were bought out of the jordanian billy geisha and in 1991 in the madrid conference we have accepted to negotiate with israel and conditionally we negotiated with this lion even when they did not freeze jewish supplements we negotiated with the president. President graham we negotiated with president obama we negotiated with president bush the son we negotiated with president bush the father with a client on we have negotiated with every american president when whatever their boards and we have negotiated with this hack share mirror with rabin over the net and yes so why not with him when we negotiated with our president conducted for meetings with the. Um and then at the moment where tom has taken unilateral measures that did job would die is the whole issue of final the stuff of negotiations what did the americans do even before launching that the the proposal they did freeze money for the n r one which is totally eliminating the issue of refugees they moved the embassy from tel aviv to jerusalem and he said that jerusalem is that theyre not the capital of the jewish people what you mean is to us that the americans are totally their chick thing the Palestinian Christian and muslim not the of about euro zone am and allowing a jewish domination or jewish not of the of domination about 0 sentiment about all of palestine thats not acceptable to us as christian and muslim palestinians that we are then big enough people of that country colonize ation claim should not be justified on historical bases or on and it isnt just bases their issue is political is not not a is not religious and that is where we stand solid on the saudi issues what are you going to do when the next thing the trumpet ministration does and we know what its going to do it signaled already theyre not going to wait the 4 year period theyve given you to come to negotiations to annex those settlements some around netanyahu telling him to do it right now itll probably happen as soon as the israeli election is over maybe somebody is seen in the future will stand up to thank him for what hes doing you know why because what the trump is doing he is endangering the security of this day to israel israel will not any more be a democracy which is not anyhow now and has not been before and it will not be in the future and this will not be jewish because look at the demography today if the ambit is missing the border turn at the end here is what the israelis are missing the border trying to be the most important. That the americans and they said it would have messed was that obese initiative which called for normalization of relations with israel and return of israeli withdrawal from all arab territories that has been occupied in 6 or 7 now that look at the demographic dynamic for the 1st time in history since 1948 until today by less the unions are more or less the me and muslims and christians more by 200000 people compared to israeli jews in historical palestine between dover jordan and Mediterranean Sea what does this mean it means that israel is a slipping into a one state reality it means that israel will never be jewish never to be democratic it means that we are going into the south african a zation of the by the scene in question well the response that i had becomes 100 percent about applied to state by de jure and by de facto some people are saying you should help it on its way you know the argument that the best thing for you to do now would be to dissolve the Palestinian Authority put yourself under israeli control effectively become one state and legally become the majority in that state is that an option no sir its not an option because for us the issue is not about this sort of thing the but as you know authority there but as you know thought is not a gift by anybody or from anybody but its generally thought of he is the result is an outcome of the sacrifices of the by this thing and people what we should do is we should move the thought out there from it being an interim or too many frustration over the authority to become a state under occupation that is where we should take the things for what one secondly the International Community which is a get on tour of International Law should realize that what the american proposal is and confrontation with International Law and that is why by the way but as event has no partners whatsoever. He has no partners in europe he has no partners in the arab countries he has no barbers and by this time 107 congressman and i mean i salute them who signed a letter to reject and similar to us as well we have had meetings with these people who didnt accept at all who really think that american brought bohrs a number of wars and is in total confrontation with International Legitimacy with International Law with United Nations resolutions or within the american political arena there is a huge split when it comes with this they didnt accept it you talk a lot about the International Community and International Law and its clear that the geneva conventions the Security Council resolution there on your side how do you take action where is your redress in the International System because as far as i can see it there are only 2 routes one is the u. N. The u. N. Security council and of course there israel has its trump card the u. S. Which will use its veto if you take any action you have the General Assembly where you can win a symbolic victory but it has no power on the other option is the International Criminal court its been dragging its feet now its going to launch an investigation into the situation with regard to settlements but also with regard to the violence in gaza but it is asked it is judges whether its actually has jurisdiction and there are some European Countries who are taking israels side on this not the court the daughter of a general did not say. That we dont have jurisdiction did not question then she didnt she didnt say that we have a jurisdiction and if any body claims the abos it believes come pouring one and they have come forward and they did but also there are some people who come forward and they are on the other side there are so many countries and organizations and law and individuals who come to say