Another TTABlog Test: Which Of These Three Section 2(d) Refu

Another TTABlog Test: Which Of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Reversed? - Intellectual Property


This week, the
TTAB decided the appeals from
the three Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusals summarized
below. At least one of the three refusals was affirmed. Let's
see how you do in divining the results. [Answer will be found in
the first comment.]
In re Jacqueline Anne Occasions, LLC, Application Serial
No. 88264864 (April 20, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge
Robert H. Coggins). [Section 2(d) refusal of
JACQUELINE
ANNE OCCASIONS [OCCASIONS disclaimed] in view of the
registered mark
JACQUELINE EVENTS & DESIGN
[EVENTS & DESIGN disclaimed], for overlapping wedding planning
services. Applicant argued that the commercial impression of the
marks differ because the cited mark is "highly suggestive of a

Related Keywords

Roberth Coggins , Cindyb Greenbaum , , Spiritual Warrior Inc , Jacqueline Anne Occasions , Application Serial , Brilliant Massage Therapy , Brilliant Massage , Judge Cindy , Judge Marc , விண்ணப்பம் சீரியல் , புத்திசாலி மசாஜ் , நீதிபதி சிண்டி , நீதிபதி மார்க் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana