Live Breaking News & Updates on விண்ணப்பம் சீரியல்|Page 1
Stay updated with breaking news from விண்ணப்பம் சீரியல். Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
This week, the TTAB decided the appeals from the three Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusals summarized below. At least one of the three refusals was affirmed. Let s see how you do in divining the results. [Answer will be found in the first comment.] In re Jacqueline Anne Occasions, LLC, Application Serial No. 88264864 (April 20, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Robert H. Coggins). [Section 2(d) refusal of JACQUELINE ANNE OCCASIONS [OCCASIONS disclaimed] in view of the registered mark JACQUELINE EVENTS & DESIGN [EVENTS & DESIGN disclaimed], for overlapping wedding planning services. Applicant argued that the commercial impression of the marks differ because the cited mark is highly suggestive of a ....
The Ever Evolving Regsitrability of Trademarks for CBD Products | Cozen O'Connor jdsupra.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from jdsupra.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
TTABlog Test: Which Of These Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Reversed? - Intellectual Property mondaq.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from mondaq.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Health your username February 8, 2021 In a complaint filed Monday in the Central District of California, Netbus makes a case for a declaratory judgment that its use of trademark “NatureM.D.” to market and sell nutritional supplements has not infringed on Pharmavite’s “Nature Made” trademark, calling Pharmavite’s infringement allegations “frivolous” and “in bad faith.” The complaint explained that dietary supplement company Netbus owns the NatureM.D. trademark, pursuant to Application Serial No. 88/905,682 filed May 7, 2020. The mark was originally to be spelled “NatureMD” but was revised Aug. 5, 2020, to add the periods and approved by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Sept. 1, 2020. ....
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: 2020 was a busy year for trademark litigation, with three U.S. Supreme Court decisions and several high-profile lower court cases involving trademark law. But many folks are understandably eager to put 2020 in the rearview mirror. So too does this article focus on the future, with the following examination of key trademark litigation trends to watch for in 2021. Fallout From Fossil: Influx of Profits Awards? The Supreme Court s recent decision in Romag Fasteners Inc. v. Fossil Group Inc.[1] held that an infringer s willfulness, while an important consideration, is not an absolute requirement for an award of profits for false advertising. A review of trial courts efforts to apply Romag shows that in the coming years, litigants can expect more robust litigation over the profits issue and, ultimately, more frequent awards of an infringer s profits. ....