And he is a fairly small legal team and is accompanied by three lawyers and is accompanied by three lawyers and their potentially for Different Cases in the works and only three lawyers and this is a massive challenge for anybody and thats referencing a lot of fundraising taking place as well and the expense of these legal battles, we will see it it is interesting to note that jack smith could have had six other people in this indictment and he chose not to add one theory out there from legal experts is that he wanted to focus only on donald trump for now with the goal of a speedy trial and trying to move this to the court as quickly as possible every no Special Counsel of said publicly that they hope for a speedy trial in this case. To that they hope for a speedy trial in this case. ,. ,. ,. , this case. To remain unnamed and unindictable this case. To remain unnamed and unindictable into this case. To remain unnamed and unindictable into the this case. To remain unnamed and unindictable into the course this case. To remain unnamed and unindictable into the course of i this case. To remain unnamed andl unindictable into the course of the Un Indictable into the course of the evening, we do not know the identity of the six Co Conspirators through some of the statements that they have made. One of the interesting things is the money spent on the legal defence and just now, three lawyers with him and the legal team is working Different Cases and 40 million spent so far and not some this money is coming from Campaign Money which in the year that will be crucially important. It money which in the year that will be crucially important. Crucially important. It will become a secial crucially important. It will become a special limited crucially important. It will become a special limited to crucially important. It will become a special limited to the crucially important. It will become a special limited to the general. A special limited to the general election of donald trump is the republican nominee. Millions and perhaps billions of dollars spent on the election of the money is crucial for buying advertising time On Television and radio and online and financing travels and the candidates across the country and all kinds of massive operations involved in the National Campaign and the President Campaign as well as affiliated pacs, be outside organisations also raise money and taking it right now, this is clearly the legal fees starting to add up for donald trump and more legalfees to the to add up for donald trump and more legal fees to the long list that should be said that the president has been doing a very good job of fundraising received massive donations and that is likely one of the reasons why, although they couldve attended this in the objects of coming to her in person and his Court Appearances and likes tojoin them in nonpartisan campaigns and it is a great way to fund raise. , campaigns and it is a great way to fund raise campaigns and it is a great way to fund raise. ,. , ~. ,. , fund raise. You talk about the money he raises and fund raise. You talk about the money he raises and is fund raise. You talk about the money he raises and is it fund raise. You talk about the money he raises and is it very fund raise. You talk about the money he raises and is it very clear fund raise. You talk about the money he raises and is it very clear with he raises and is it very clear with the electorate, what theyre paying money for because a middle class supporter of donald trump, list of contributing to the campaign are they contributing to a fund to fight they contributing to a fund to fight the weapon i asked Justice Department . Is this blatant is that . Donald trump has been blurring the lines of what is been going on with them legally and politically, but there very much mixed together, there very much mixed together, there being recognised against me, jack smith, the why doesntjoe biden, they want to take me down because im the republican front runner hes been saying this to his supporters and its fair to assume that many of his supporters note that many of his supporters note that that money could well be used as legal Defence Costs and theyll be happy to oblige and put money forward to make sure that donald trump can win. And its very clear that the former president himself is mentioned that winning these cases are being able to delay them long enough that he can potentially become president again is also part of a legal strategy because if he does become president again, he can either pardon himself and some of these crimes but he may be able to order theJustice Department these crimes but he may be able to order the Justice Department to these crimes but he may be able to order theJustice Department to drop these cases altogether. The legal matters and the campaigning all starting to become one of the same for donald trump and his supporters appear outside of the courthouse and theyre willing to give money not only does campaign but also to his legalfunds. Only does campaign but also to his legal funds legal funds. You can see the Satellite Trucks legal funds. You can see the Satellite Trucks and legal funds. You can see the Satellite Trucks and the Satellite Trucks and the International Committee gathers in the building as we launch these live pictures, let me introduce you to our panel, the political scientists, confirming that they are the former Director Of Communications and Donald Trumps Transition Team and former white house lawyerjoining us this evening. I could start with you. 78 charges now in total, three indictments, the way. Give us your thoughts on what is unfolding here tonight and the significance of this particular indictment. Unprecedented in us history particular indictment. Unprecedented in us history to particular indictment. Unprecedented in us history to have particular indictment. Unprecedented in us history to have a particular indictment. Unprecedented in us history to have a former in us history to have a former president facing all of these indictments. The latest round quite serious and certainly, there will be a lot to say about that. And very little pushback against the continued erosion of american norms and legitimacy of american political institutions. We are in this circumstance in part because impeachment is no longer functional as a check or a balance on executive authority. It is become politcised. Increasingly, the Average American does not care what the nature of the indictment is, what matters is not what prompted her to not do, what matters is your tribal affiliation. Are you aligned with trump or are you opposed to him and that determines how you feel about whether or not these charges are legitimate and whether you Pay Attention to the process, the outcome or if you even think it is hunter biden and President Biden that are the ones who should be impeached. That they are the ones that should not ever serve in office and the election indeed thatjoe biden won fairly was actually stolen. That is not a functional democracy. Remember, the United States back when the wall fell was really a beacon and other countries wanted to align their Political Systems with it. States is still a world superpower and as incredible defence capabilities and the dollar as the World Reserve currency but no one, not the prince, not the canadians, no one looks at the us Political System in the videos you are showing today and saying i wish my country ran like that. And that is something i think theres one thing that all americans can agree on, it is probably that statement. In mexico point. The fragility of american democracy. There was a strategy even before the 2020 election to undermine the vote and create doubt. He makes a great point. Donald trump is not someone who respects donald trump is not someone who respects democracy. Even in the election. Respects democracy. Even in the election. If respects democracy. Even in the election, if you want to throw hillary election, if you want to throw Hillary Clinton injail, and Elected Leader Hillary Clinton injail, and Elected Leader who treads to throw their opponents injail for no other reason opponents injail for no other reason whatsoever is not a leader suitable reason whatsoever is not a leader suitable for democracy. Culture throughout his presidency use the justice throughout his presidency use the Justice Department and state department and its administration in Order Department and its administration in order to department and its administration in order to further his electoral ambitions in violation of the law. Repeated ambitions in violation of the law. Repeated violations in several of the agencies during this, he was impeached for his extortion effort of fees impeached for his extortion effort of fees for impeached for his extortion effort of fees for the ukraine, threatening to withhold military aid in ukraine and must to withhold military aid in ukraine and must be investigated joe biden for him and must be investigated joe biden for him to and must be investigated joe biden for him to help his campaign and the problems for him to help his campaign and the problems of donald trump go on and on. Problems of donald trump go on and on this problems of donald trump go on and on this is problems of donald trump go on and on. This is predictable, what happened in 2020. When he lost his election. Happened in 2020. When he lost his election. He happened in 2020. When he lost his election, he turned all the powers of the election, he turned all the powers of the Executive Branch towards reversing of the Executive Branch towards reversing his defeat and asked the justice reversing his defeat and asked the Justice Department to declare the election Justice Department to declare the election invalid and he wanted to send election invalid and he wanted to send in election invalid and he wanted to send in the military to redo the election send in the military to redo the election in send in the military to redo the election in several states and he ended election in several states and he ended up election in several states and he ended up sending an angry mob Up To The Hill ended up sending an angry mob up to the hiliand ended up sending an angry mob Up To The Hill and insisted on having the secret the hill and insisted on having the secret Service Driver to come up to lead the mob and he attacked a service lead the mob and he attacked a service truck. This is an attempt by an elected service truck. This is an attempt by an Elected Leader to try to stay in power an Elected Leader to try to stay in power through subversion of the electoral power through subversion of the Electoral Process and encouraging violence Electoral Process and encouraging violence and he is a very dangerous trend violence and he is a very dangerous trend in violence and he is a very dangerous trend in our violence and he is a very dangerous trend in our democracy if we cannot tolerate trend in our democracy if we cannot tolerate it trend in our democracy if we cannot tolerate it in trend in our democracy if we cannot tolerate it in the United States regardless what Political Party you are on regardless what Political Party you are on. �. , regardless what Political Party you areon. �. ,. Regardless what Political Party you areon. �. Are on. Brian, this council has avoided a are on. Brian, this council has avoided a discussion are on. Brian, this council has avoided a discussion of are on. Brian, this council has avoided a discussion of the i avoided a discussion of the president ial election but starting this afternoon, the districtjudge is going to have to take into consideration that the he is going to be campaigning in short order, what pressure is she likely to come under the screen overwhelming. President trump and his allies overwhelming. President trump and his allie �. Overwhelming. President trump and his allie � ,. , overwhelming. President trump and his allie � ,. ,. , his allies hes ust going to hiuuhliht his allies hes ust going to highlight the his allies hesjust going to highlight the challenges i his allies hesjust going to i highlight the challenges ahead his allies hesjust going to highlight the challenges ahead for this Church Highlight the challenges ahead for this church and highlight the challenges ahead for this church and the highlight the challenges ahead for this church and the pressures i highlight the challenges ahead for this church and the pressures can| highlight the challenges ahead for i this church and the pressures can be overwhelming this church and the pressures can be overwhelming. You this church and the pressures can be overwhelming. You should this church and the pressures can be overwhelming. You should be this church and the pressures can be overwhelming. You should be able l this church and the pressures can be i overwhelming. You should be able to resist overwhelming. You should be able to resist that . Overwhelming. You should be able to resist that . Does overwhelming. You should be able to resist that . Does the overwhelming. You should be able to resist that . Does the public overwhelming. You should be able to resist that . Does the public get overwhelming. You should be able to resist that . Does the public get so i resist that . Does the public get so wound resist that . Does the public get so wound up resist that . Does the public get so wound up that resist that . Does the public get so wound up that you resist that . Does the public get so wound up that you have resist that . Does the public get so wound up that you have to resist that . Does the public get so wound up that you have to find i wound up that you have to find a release wound up that you have to find a Release Valve wound up that you have to find a Release Valve because wound up that you have to find a Release Valve because it wound up that you have to find a Release Valve because it is wound up that you have to find a Release Valve because it is not. Release valve because it is not a lot of Release Valve because it is not a lot of confidence Release Valve because it is not a lot of confidence in Release Valve because it is not a lot of confidence in what Release Valve because it is not a lot of confidence in what some i lot of confidence in what some unsavoury lot of confidence in what some unsavoury save lot of confidence in what some unsavoury save a lot of confidence in what some unsavoury save a partisan i lot of confidence in what some i unsavoury save a partisan court in washington. Unsavoury save a partisan court in washington. Dc unsavoury save a partisan court in washington, dc. At unsavoury save a partisan court in washington, dc. At the unsavoury save a partisan court in washington, dc. At the Pressurel Unsavoury save a partisan court ini washington, dc. At the pressure is going washington, dc. At the pressure is going to washington, dc. At the pressure is going to be washington, dc. At the pressure is going to be absolutely washington, dc. At the pressure is. Going to be absolutely overwhelming. But is going to be absolutely overwhelming. But is no going to be absolutely overwhelming. But is no precedent going to be absolutely overwhelming. But is no precedent here, going to be absolutely overwhelming. But is no precedent here, what going to be absolutely overwhelming. But is no precedent here, what is but is no precedent here, what is object supposed to do when trend trying to balance this type of Criminal Case . Trying to balance this type of Criminal Case . From the trump standpoint. Criminal case . From the trump standpoint, they Criminal Case . From the trump standpoint, they want Criminal Case . From the trump l standpoint, they want everything some standpoint, they want everything some of standpoint, they want everything some of them standpoint, they want everything some of them may standpoint, they want everything some of them may be standpoint, they want everything some of them may be to standpoint, they want everything some of them may be to be i standpoint, they want everything i some of them may be to be successful decemben but some of them may be to be successful december. But ultimately, some of them may be to be successful december. But ultimately, for some of them may be to be successful december. But ultimately, for lack december. But ultimately, for lack of a better december. But ultimately, for lack of a better word, december. But ultimately, for lack of a better word, before december. But ultimately, for lack of a better word, before this december. But ultimately, for lackj of a better word, before this divide to decide. A president serving jail time. Decide. A president serving jail time. Thats decide. A president serving jail time. Thats a decide. A president serving jail time, thats a decision decide. A president serving jail time, thats a Decision After decide. A president serving jail time, thats a Decision After the i time, thats a Decision After the voters time, thats a Decision After the voters might time, thats a Decision After the voters might not time, thats a Decision After the voters might not know time, thats a Decision After the voters might not know the i time, thats a Decision After the. Voters might not know the judicial Process Voters might not know the Judicial Process The voters might not know the Judicial Process The politics voters might not know the Judicial Process The politics of voters might not know the Judicial Process The politics ofjust voters might not know the Judicial Process The politics ofjust going i process the politics ofjust going to be process the politics ofjust going to be overwhelming process the politics ofjust going to be overwhelming and process the politics ofjust going to be overwhelming and this process the politics ofjust going to be overwhelming and this can process the politics ofjust going i to be overwhelming and this can be so much to be overwhelming and this can be so much pressure to be overwhelming and this can be so much Pressure Playing to be overwhelming and this can be so much Pressure Playing into i to be overwhelming and this can be so much Pressure Playing into thatl so much Pressure Playing into that in a population so much Pressure Playing into that in a population that so much Pressure Playing into that in a population that believes so much Pressure Playing into that in a population that believes that i in a population that believes that needs in a population that believes that needs to in a population that believes that needs to happen in a population that believes that needs to happen and in a population that believes that needs to happen and now, in a population that believes that needs to happen and now, your. In a population that believes that i needs to happen and now, your going to run needs to happen and now, your going to run into needs to happen and now, your going to run into serious needs to happen and now, your going to run into serious challenges. To run into serious challenges. Thats to run into serious challenges. Thats a to run into serious challenges. Thats a at to run into serious challenges. Thats a at some to run into serious challenges. Thats a at some of to run into serious challenges. Thats a at some of the to run into serious challenges. Thats a at some of the defences that donald trump may put to these claims and thats put on screen but the First Amendment is. Its probably going to be the first paragraph of a lien on. Establishment of which are free bridging the Freedom Of Speech or press petitioning the government for a what the prosecutors left the show and failed to establish is that donald trump knew he was spreading lies, correct . Will focus on the intent. We have coconspirators, will focus on the intent. We have coconspirators, we will focus on the intent. We have coconspirators, we know will focus on the intent. We have coconspirators, we know there i will focus on the intent. We have i coconspirators, we know there are Co Conspirators, we know there are lots of people under a lot of pressure to talk about what donald trump said to them and a lot of that is not come out yet but i am not a lawyer. It seems to me that there wouldnt be put in this case forward because the pressure can spreading the space taking my case forward is very high in the buffer going after former president , unless you believe that the Department Ofjustice and the Special Counsel in the Department Ofjustice with the Attorney General feels that he is not capable because of his position into a point to them, lets make the argument that their institutions already have no word that the bar for bringing this case is very high indeedin for bringing this case is very high indeed in severity as real. And it does mean donald trump is guilty before he sees court but to believe your previous panelist, brian is absolutely right that the politics are impossible to navigate because anyjuror in washington, dc is going to be presumed is overwhelmingly biased against trump because the justice has already been overseeing so many cases that have shown participants in the january six riots are guilty of serious crimes and if youre on the other side of that politically, you already as a matter, of course, know all that is fundamentally a legitimate which makes it very hard to it this just play out in the ballot box its precisely the fact that the rule of law is only been damaged in the United States and the edge have the inability of allowing this process to simply play out its a bit of a catch 22 because no matter what happens in the case in the election, very large parts of the population the Political System will be irretrievably angry with where we are. It irretrievably angry with where we are. ,. ,. ,~. Are. It depends on how you view donald trump are. It depends on how you view donald trump in are. It depends on how you view donald trump in the are. It depends on how you view| donald trump in the prosecution are. It depends on how you view donald trump in the prosecution many politicians point the election was stolen and that is, from 63 in may. The number of republicans have been through election think the election was stolen is wrong. And now, he is sitting in the front row of the courthouse and donald trump will be face to face with his accuser and he has already guessed for the defence will go with this it might� ve a bit of talked about the First Amendment defence he puts it out on page two of the indictment. Thats what he says. Does it convince you . Yes, based on what ive does it convince you . Yes, based on what ive seen does it convince you . Yes, based on what ive seen in does it convince you . Yes, based on what ive seen in the what ive seen in the indictment. This is what ive seen in the indictment. This is to what ive seen in the indictment. This is to be what ive seen in the indictment. This is to be proven beyond reasonable doubt at trial. Setting forth on reasonable doubt at trial. Setting forth on the indictment, if donald trump forth on the indictment, if donald trump is forth on the indictment, if donald trump is guilty of all accounts, establishing this as a matter of fact will establishing this as a matter of fact will be absolutely critical for the prosecution and there is a First Amendment right for candidates who have lost amendment right for candidates who have lost the election to say that he won have lost the election to say that he won even if you was paid 8 million he won even if you was paid 8 million votes, a large margin of the electoral million votes, a large margin of the electoral college. He can also go to Court Electoral college. He can also go to court as electoral college. He can also go to court as he electoral college. He can also go to court as he did multiple times and dozens court as he did multiple times and dozens of court as he did multiple times and dozens of times in Federal Court To Challenge Dozens Of Times In federal court to challenge the count every single time. Challenge the count every single time, being told no by the court, including time, being told no by the court, including a time, being told no by the court, including a Supreme Court with three justices including a Supreme Court with three justices that she appointed and not a single justices that she appointed and not a single one of them signed with this argument. What is not entitled to do this argument. What is not entitled to do is this argument. What is not entitled to do is put this argument. What is not entitled to do is put extraordinary pressure, uses to do is put extraordinary pressure, uses office to do is put extraordinary pressure, uses office to put pressure on the Vice President of the United States to violate Vice President of the United States to violate the constitution to simply to violate the constitution to simply declare himself the winner. He is simply declare himself the winner. He is not simply declare himself the winner. He is not entitled to do that and uses he is not entitled to do that and uses office to coerce the Justice Department to writing a memo declaring that the election was fraudulent which the acting Attorney General fraudulent which the acting Attorney General refused to do. The fraudulent which the acting Attorney General refused to do. General refused to do. The point is he did not use general refused to do. The point is he did not use his general refused to do. The point is he did not use his Office General refused to do. The point is he did not use his office to do i he did not use his office to do that, he brought people. What is lawyer is saying is that he got advice from councils that were very wise and learned on a variety of constitutional and legal issues. His mind, this is the ratio for defence of the president had every right to advocate a position that he believed in and that the support is believed in. I in and that the support is believed in. ~. In and that the support is believed in. ~ ,. , in. I think the biggest criticism of President Trump in. I think the biggest criticism of President Trump in in. I think the biggest criticism of President Trump in the in. I think the biggest criticism of President Trump in the 20 20 i President Trump in the 20 20 election President Trump in the 20 20 election was President Trump in the 20 20 election was his President Trump in the 20 20 election was his verbiage, i President Trump in the 20 20 i election was his verbiage, with respect election was his verbiage, with respect to election was his verbiage, with respect to the election was his verbiage, with respect to the Changing Election was his verbiage, with respect to the changing of election was his verbiage, with respect to the changing of the i respect to the changing of the election respect to the changing of the election the respect to the changing of the election the state respect to the changing of the i election the state legislatures. Respect to the changing of the. Election the state legislatures. I thought election the state legislatures. I thought that election the state legislatures. I thought that was election the state legislatures. I thought that was the election the state legislatures. I thought that was the strongest i thought that was the strongest argument thought that was the strongest argument and thought that was the strongest argument and admit thought that was the strongest argument and admit made i thought that was the strongestj argument and admit made that argument argument and admit made that argument since argument and admit made that argument since the argument and admit made that argument since the Laws Argument and admit made that argument since the laws which| argument and admit made that argument since the laws which didnt follow argument since the laws which didnt follow the argument since the laws which didnt follow the normal argument since the laws which didnt follow the normal procedures argument since the laws which didnt follow the normal procedures is i argument since the laws which didnt follow the normal procedures is an. Follow the normal procedures is an issue follow the normal procedures is an issue and follow the normal procedures is an issue and is follow the normal procedures is an issue and is probably follow the normal procedures is an issue and is probably what follow the normal procedures is an issue and is probably what youve i issue and is probably what youve seen issue and is probably what youve seen support issue and is probably what youve seen support within issue and is probably what youve seen support within the issue and is probably what youve i seen support within the Republican Party struck seen support within the Republican Party struck the seen support within the Republican Party struck the joe seen support within the Republican Party struck the joe biden seen support within the Republican Party struck the joe biden was i seen support within the Republican Party struck the joe biden was an l party struck the joe biden was an illegitimate party struck the joe biden was an illegitimate president. Party struck the joe biden was an illegitimate president. If party struck the joe biden was an illegitimate president. If they i party struck the joe biden was an. Illegitimate president. If they have to defend illegitimate president. If they have to defend position, illegitimate president. If they have to defend position, my illegitimate president. If they have i to defend position, my understanding of the to defend position, my understanding of the legal to defend position, my understanding of the legal argument to defend position, my understanding of the legal argument is to defend position, my understanding of the legal argument is that to defend position, my understanding of the legal argument is that the i of the legal argument is that the constitutional of the legal argument is that the Constitutional Review of the legal argument is that the Constitutional Review because i of the legal argument is that the Constitutional Review because of| of the legal argument is that the i Constitutional Review because of the legislature Constitutional Review because of the Legislature Since Constitutional Review because of the Legislature Since his Constitutional Review because of the Legislature Since his legislatures i Legislature Since his legislatures were Legislature Since his legislatures were the Legislature Since his legislatures were the ones Legislature Since his legislatures were the ones that Legislature Since his legislatures were the ones that changed i Legislature Since his legislatures i were the ones that changed these laws or were the ones that changed these laws or without were the ones that changed these laws or without Legislative Laws or without legislative approval~ laws or without legislative approval. That laws or without legislative approval. That is laws or without legislative approval. That is the i laws or without legislative approval. That is the key. Laws or without legislativel approval. That is the key is laws or without legislative i approval. That is the key is the going approval. That is the key is the going to approval. That is the key is the going to make. Approval. That is the key is the going to make, they approval. That is the key is the going to make, they seem approval. That is the key is the| going to make, they seem very confident going to make, they seem very confident in going to make, they seem very confident in seeing going to make, they seem very confident in seeing them going to make, they seem very confident in seeing them on confident in seeing them On Television confident in seeing them on Television Seen confident in seeing them on Television Seenjohn confident in seeing them on Television Seenjohn e confident in seeing them on. Television Seenjohn E Spence attorney Television Seenjohn e spence attorney on Television Seenjohn e spence attorney On Television Television Seenjohn e spence attorney On Television saying i Television Seenjohn e spence i attorney On Television saying the same attorney On Television saying the same thing attorney On Television saying the same thing is attorney On Television saying the same thing is just a attorney On Television saying the same thing isjust a matter attorney On Television saying the same thing isjust a matter of. Same thing isjust a matter of political same thing isjust a matter of Political Theory same thing isjust a matter of Political Theory is same thing isjust a matter of Political Theory is if same thing isjust a matter of Political Theory is if its same thing isjust a matter of Political Theory is if its a Political Theory is if its a Believable Political Theory is if its a believable legal Political Theory is if its a believable legal period l Political Theory is if its a. Believable legal period and Political Theory is if its a believable legal period and maybe there believable legal period and maybe there was believable legal period and maybe there was a believable legal period and maybe there was a small believable legal period and maybe there was a small window believable legal period and maybe there was a small window where l believable legal period and maybe there was a small window where trump knew she there was a small window where trump knew she had there was a small window where trump knew she had lost there was a small window where trump knew she had lost because there was a small window where trump knew she had lost because probably knew she had lost because probably wednesday knew she had lost because probably wednesday or knew she had lost because probably wednesday or thursday knew she had lost because probably wednesday or thursday after knew she had lost because probably wednesday or thursday after the i wednesday or thursday after the election wednesday or thursday after the election but wednesday or thursday after the election but by wednesday or thursday after the election but by friday, wednesday or thursday after the election but by friday, he wednesday or thursday after the election but by friday, he was i election but by friday, he was convinced election but by friday, he was convinced that election but by friday, he was convinced that he election but by friday, he was convinced that he was election but by friday, he was| convinced that he was cheated election but by friday, he was convinced that he was cheated out of the election convinced that he was cheated out of the election will convinced that he was cheated out of the election will be convinced that he was cheated out of the election will be very convinced that he was cheated out of the election will be very hard to the election will be very hard to convince the election will be very hard to convince people the election will be very hard to convince people otherwise. The election will be very hard to. Convince people otherwise. What the election will be very hard to convince people otherwise. What you think about the convince people otherwise. What you think about the statement convince people otherwise. What you think about the statement and convince people otherwise. What you think about the statement and the i think about the statement and the vote is immaterial when he is getting Special Counsel and advice on that from expert people within the white house. People have criticised john eastman for coming to the spurious serious doubts can be done in the question is whether he firmly believed that the election had been stolen and whether he executed a criminal conspiracy to overturn but he was being told, just with the former Attorney General said last night. fist with the former Attorney General said last night. Said last night. At first, i was not sure but i said last night. At first, i was not sure but i have said last night. At first, i was not sure but i have come said last night. At first, i was not sure but i have come to said last night. At first, i was not sure but i have come to believe l sure but i have come to believe that he knew well that he had lost the election and what i think is important is the government assumes the burden of proving that there indictment and they take the position that he had actual knowledge that he had lost the election and it wasnt stolen through fraud. And they have to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt. But the high bar. And were only the iceberg in this. You doubt. But the high bar. And were only the iceberg in this. Only the iceberg in this. You think theyre more . Only the iceberg in this. You think theyre more . I only the iceberg in this. You think theyre more . I believe only the iceberg in this. You think theyre more . I believe he only the iceberg in this. You think theyre more . I believe he has. Only the iceberg in this. You think theyre more . I believe he has al only the iceberg in this. You think. Theyre more . I believe he has a lot more. Theyre more . I believe he has a lot more theyre more . I believe he has a lot more tip theyre more . I believe he has a lot more tip of theyre more . I believe he has a lot more. Tip of the theyre more . I believe he has a lot more. Tip of the iceberg. Theyre more . I believe he has a lot more. Tip of the iceberg. Brian i more. Tip of the iceberg. Brian believes the more. Tip of the iceberg. Brian believes the people more. Tip of the iceberg. Brian believes the people he more. Tip of the iceberg. Brian believes the people he brought in, if he goes with the defence, what is the risk to him in the defence that is trying to build at the risk to him in the defence that is trying to buil is trying to build at the white house lawyers is trying to build at the white house lawyers said is trying to build at the white house lawyers said this is trying to build at the white house lawyers said this was, | is trying to build at the white house lawyers said this was, the Department Ofjustice put department of justice put extraordinary Department Ofjustice put extraordinary pressure to say that the election had been a fraud. And the election had been a fraud. And the only the election had been a fraud. And the only lawyers telling us this that theyve been advising the campaign, Includingjohn Eastman that theyve been advising the campaign, including john eastman and the others campaign, including john eastman and the others and you have all of these tawyers the others and you have all of these lawyers with some crackpot theories and theyre lawyers with some crackpot theories and theyre a bunch of people with crackpot and theyre a bunch of people with crackpot theories and people told joe biden that the president of the united joe biden that the president of the United States that he just should ignore United States that he just should ignore the orders of the Supreme Court ignore the orders of the Supreme Court and ignore the orders of the Supreme Court and theyre going to find someone court and theyre going to find someone who said Something Like that if they someone who said Something Like that if they did someone who said Something Like that if they did ignore the orders of the supreme if they did ignore the orders of the Supreme Court, which would be impeached tomorrow. The fact that you can impeached tomorrow. The fact that you can find a lawyer who can come up you can find a lawyer who can come up with you can find a lawyer who can come up with some theory, some far fetched theory is john eastman did that far fetched theory is john eastman did that the Vice President of the united did that the Vice President of the United States can simply declare the iooser United States can simply declare the tooser the United States can simply declare the looser the winner of the president ial election doesnt mean that the president ial election doesnt mean that the president of the United States that the president of the United States using the power of his office can act states using the power of his office can act on states using the power of his office can act on that theory. If states using the power of his office can act on that theory. Can act on that theory. If they go with that defence, can act on that theory. If they go with that defence, does can act on that theory. If they go with that defence, does he can act on that theory. If they go with that defence, does he put l can act on that theory. If they go with that defence, does he put aside Client Confidentiality and is that open the pandoras box of that is one of the pillars of the defence . All of these communications will come all of these communications will come out all of these communications will come out and many of them have already come out and many of them have already because theres a exception to confidentiality and if you use a lawyer to confidentiality and if you use a lawyer to to confidentiality and if you use a lawyer to commit a crime or fraud, and the lawyer to commit a crime or fraud, and the lawyer is advising this in the communications are not confidential in many of these communications are already out anyway communications are already out anyway in communications are already out anyway in the public because of the client anyway in the public because of the client privilege and donald trump Teads Client Privilege and donald trump leads advice and councils and all the more leads advice and councils and all the more going to be out in the public and the more going to be out in the public and its also going to be clear public and its also going to be clear as public and its also going to be clear as it public and its also going to be clear as it is already from the testimony from the january Six Committee that the white house Tawyers Committee that the white house lawyers in the Justice Department tawyers lawyers in the Justice Department lawyers are political appointees that they told donald trump no. A that they told donald trump no. Number of details the proceedings in the court is that youre looking at there. News that donald trump is in there. News that donald trump is in the Court Officers about to go into the Court Officers about to go into the courthouse, what if you heard . Donald trump is just entered the courtroom and is a small modest room with three benches as you mentioned, Special Counsel and sitting in the very front row, donald trump is just passed by him and moved over with his legal team is now sitting at the table and you may have seen earlier that he is wearing a blue suit with customary red tie missing at the table and speaking with his attorneys and waiting for his arraignment to begin and it should begin around four oclock local time, just a matter of minutes now and his attorneys are with him and we know that theyre expected with him as well and as you mentioned, the Special Counsel sitting in the front rowjust the Special Counsel sitting in the front row just a few feet away from the former president. The front rowjust a few feet away from the former president. The magistrate residin the former president. The magistrate presiding over the former president. The magistrate presiding over this, the former president. The magistrate presiding over this, what the former president. The magistrate presiding over this, what is the former president. The magistrate presiding over this, what is it the former president. The magistrate presiding over this, what is it that presiding over this, what is it that the magistrate is to decide and imagine with the timetable is from here going forward, correct . This is a very structured here going forward, correct . This is a very structured meeting. Here going forward, correct . This is a very structured meeting. A here going forward, correct . This is a very structured meeting. A very i a very structured meeting. A very brief arraignment and should last between 30 minutes in 60 minutes. There will not be a whole lot of official business taking care of, that will be done by the judge for of the case itself and the Magistrate Judge who is of the case itself and the magistratejudge who is presiding right now in the courtroom behind us. It will be the standard procedure to be seen before and having those churches read up to the former president and Process Taking place and the Magistrate Judge would take Donald Trumps plea of not guilty and there will be some issues brought up her thisjudge guilty and there will be some issues brought up her this judge we have seen some issues taken care of by magistrates when it comes to conditions of release in the former president is still in the 2024 republican front runner by a long shot and so, the question would be, will there be any restrictions placed on who donald trump to talk to, for instance, the previous classified documents k 3 was instructed not to speak about the case of to other members were also being arraigned and that wouldve been the codefendants in that case there could be something similar coming up in this case well have to see exactly what happens when the arraignment begins but no major decisions, no decisions about the case itself and there could be something brought up about whether or not the trial venue should be changed and these are the sorts of things the magistrate will look at but in terms of when the actual trial date will be set, that would take place at a further hearing next week and the jUdge Presiding take place at a further hearing next week and Thejudge Presiding over this case. Week and the Udge Presiding over this case. ,. ,. , this case. There are two lawyers on the front row this case. There are two lawyers on the front row and this case. There are two lawyers on the front row and donald this case. There are two lawyers on the front row and donald trump this case. There are two lawyers on j the front row and donald trump sat between the both of them and he did not come through the main doors of the courtroom, he went to the corridors in the back doors according to avoid the public in the Secret Service accompanying him, always with a former president. For the moment, thank you very much for that. I am looking for the Crowns Outside crowds outside in the banners they are holding up sing lock him up and people around the world are looking at this and a rap sheet he is facing and thinking how on earth is he still in the running for the presidency and the pulling is quite revealing. But start with joe biden and this might give her viewersjust a clue joe biden and this might give her viewers just a clue as to why donald trump is still in the contest. 4i Approval Rating that is a step in the low Approval Rating. The low Approval Rating no Approval Rating that is a step in the low Approval Rating no political candidate in the low Approval Rating no political candidate in the the low Approval Rating no political candidate in the united the low Approval Rating no political candidate in the United States the low Approval Rating no political. Candidate in the United States today candidate in the United States today can really get a high political approval because the polarisation is simply too great. After 9 11, former president bush was in the low 905 because everyone came together in the face of a common enemy. They would not be possible even given that cri5i5 would not be possible even given that crisis in the United States today. Bitings advanced age and some of it is a perception that the us economy is not performing well for the Average American despite her doing quite a bit better than the european inflation level and which is not necessarily keeping up with that. And some of it is, harri5 affected people are concerned for joe biden, given that hell be 86 at the end of a second term and she would likely lead to a Vice President harris assuming the presidency. I think because of the general reasons why but fact is that donald trump who, in my personal view, was incredibly incapable and uninterested in governing the United States, i dont think he was a good president , he was one of the most artful and effective campaigners ive ever experienced in my lifetime. This is a man whose brilliance is communicating. Its all about him, hes larger than life, hes a master of the media and the master of social media and in the United States where a Campaign Takes two years and cost billions of dollars, it turns out that trump was really good at getting the job. That trump was really good at getting thejob. He that trump was really good at getting the job. He wasnt so great at doing thejob getting the job. He wasnt so great at doing the job but he was connecting thejob and at doing the job but he was connecting the job and guess whats happening, hes trying to get the job again. Hes really good at that. That is true, even given all of these alleged crimes and its not just because he told his supporters that if i shot someone on fifth avenue, i wouldnt miss a single vote, was he shot some one of his voters and then he would lose one one vote. 0r voters and then he would lose one one vote. Or perhaps thats fun and amusing and often remembered but its also because Donald Trump Campaign has been a campaign of grievance and he is telling people they are not indicting me, they are indicting you. That is why he is raising tens of millions of dollars from his supporters to fight his legal battles and you look at it from the outside and you say
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.