Can eye rolling be a reason to challenge an arbitrator? : vi

Introduction
In a decision of 23 July 2020 (Docket 18 ONc 3/20s), the Supreme Court dealt with the challenge of an arbitrator on the grounds that he had rolled his eyes during the pleading of a party's representative. The eye rolling, according to the applicants, "downright revealed" the arbitrator's bias. Said arbitrator did not explicitly contest the accusation of having rolled his eyes. Nonetheless, he claimed to be able to objectively give a legal assessment of the facts of the case.
In this decision, the Supreme Court:
confirmed once again that strict standards for impartially bias apply;
confirmed once again that the reasons for challenging state court judges serve as guidelines for challenging arbitrators; and

Related Keywords

Austria , Vienna , Wien , Austrian , Graf Pitkowitz , Los Angeles , Nikolaus Pitkowitzat Graf Pitkowitz , Vienna Regional Court , Supreme Court , Supreme Administrative Court , Vienna International Arbitral Centre , Innsbruck Higher Regional Court , Vienna International Arbitral , Los Angeles Based , Civil Proceedings , Nikolaus Pitkowitzat Graf , ஆஸ்ட்ரியா , வியன்னா , வீந் , ஆஸ்திரேலிய , லாஸ் ஏஞ்சல்ஸ் , வியன்னா பிராந்திய நீதிமன்றம் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , வியன்னா சர்வதேச நடுவர் மையம் , இந்ந்‌ஸ்ப்ரக் அதிக பிராந்திய நீதிமன்றம் , வியன்னா சர்வதேச நடுவர் , லாஸ் ஏஞ்சல்ஸ் அடிப்படையிலானது ,