Consent Of Parties Cannot Obviate Duty Of Court To Indicate

Consent Of Parties Cannot Obviate Duty Of Court To Indicate Its Reasons For Granting Or Refusing Bail: Supreme Court


Share This -
x
Consent of parties cannot obviate the duty of the High Court to indicate its reasons why it has either granted or refuse bail, the Supreme Court observed.
The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah observed that a Court granting bail cannot obviate its duty to apply a judicial mind and to record reasons, brief as they may be, for the purpose of deciding whether or not to grant bail.
The court observed thus while setting aside the orders of the High Court of Gujarat granting bail, under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to six murder accused who were arrested for their alleged involvement in five homicidal deaths. In the order granting bail, the High Court recorded that 'Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not press for further reasoned order'. Disapproving this approach, the bench observed:

Related Keywords

, Ram Govind Upadhyay , Sudharshan Singh , Chaman Lal , Supreme Court , Sessions Court , High Court , Criminal Procedure , Learned Advocates , Single Judge , Ramesh Bhavan Rathod , Hirabhai Makwana , Reasoned Bail Order , Onsent Of Parties , ரேம் கோவிந்த் உபாதியாய் , சுதர்ஷன் சிங் , சாமன் லால் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , அமர்வுகள் நீதிமன்றம் , உயர் நீதிமன்றம் , குற்றவாளி ப்ரொஸீஜர் , கற்று வக்கீல்கள் , ஒற்றை நீதிபதி ,

© 2025 Vimarsana