Copying for Compatability, Rather than Creativity, is Fair |

Copying for Compatability, Rather than Creativity, is Fair | Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.


To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
The Supreme Court finally resolved the dispute between Google and Oracle over Google’s copying of 11,500 lines of declaring code from nearly 3 million lines of code from Sun Java API was copyright infringement. Dodging the question of whether such code is even copyrightable, the Supreme Court found that the copying of the code, for the purpose of making Android programming similar to other Java programming, was a fair use.
The Supreme Court found that the Federal Circuit correctly identified Fair Use as a mixed question of law and fact, but ultimately held that the Federal Circuit was wrong as a matter of law when it reversed the jury’s determination of Fair Use. The Court thoroughly analyzed the four factors identified in 17 USC 107 before concluding that on balance, accounting for the functional nature of computer software, Google’s use was a non-infringing Fair Use.

Related Keywords

, Google , Supreme Court , Oracle , Sun Java , Federal Circuit , Fair Use , கூகிள் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , ஆரக்கிள் , சூரியன் ஜாவா , கூட்டாட்சியின் சுற்று , நியாயமான பயன்பாடு ,

© 2025 Vimarsana