This deal . Do you support it . Are you opposed . You can also send us a tweet. Or tell us what you think on race book. Com the phone lines are open so start dialing in. Atlanta journalconstitution says here are the details those are some of the details of the Iran Nuclear Deal. What do you think, should congress support or oppose the president on this . Christina peterson talks about the review process by congress. Lets begin with yesterday and the initial reaction from Republican Leadership who control both the house and the senate floor agenda. Guest Republican Leaders made very clear yesterday that they are not going into this with great optimism, that this will be a deal they can support. They were sharply critical of announcing justin that upon further expansion inspection if the deal is what they think it is, they will try hard to block it. Host how would they do that much . Guest the bill has 60 days in congress for review and by the end of that which will probably be when they return from their august recess, they are likely to take some type of boat. Leadership can decide whether that will be a vote to approve the deal or to disapprove of the deal. That is a decision they get to make and will influence what happens on capitol hill. Most likely, it looks like they would bring up a vote to disapprove the deal. It would be a joint resolution of disapproval. That would have to first clear the hurdle of getting 60 votes in the senate to pass. It will likely be easier for such a measure to pass in the house. And the president could the toe that if veto that. Were that to happen, it would come back to congress and the question would be whether there were enough votes to sustain the president s veto override it. Host lets begin with before we get to that point of a possible veto. Are there enough democrats on the residents side on this . Guest its a little tricky to tell. Democrats were very cautious yesterday. Most of them said they wanted time to study the review and talk to experts we expect there to be hearings on capitol hill. Very few people gave their outright support yesterday. But it seems particularly in the senate that its tough to imagine there being enough votes to override a veto. It is a bigger question about whether there would be 60 votes to pass a resolution of disapproval in the first place. Host Vice President joe biden is coming to capitol hill today to talk to lawmakers. Is he meeting with just democrats . Guest yes, from what i know so far, i believe its House Democrats. Certainly on the senate side im sure there will be other Administration Officials reaching out. The Vice President has been calling lawmakers already. He spoke with senator chris coons on tuesday. The president was reaching out to lawmakers monday night ahead of this deal being officially announced. The administration is definitely getting into sales pitch mode to convince lawmakers this is a deal they want to support. Host what does this do, if anything, to the monthlong recess . Guest i have heard different there is about this. On the one hand, some people say having this review period stretch beyond the august research recess gives critics a chance to oppose the deal. I have also heard the idea that lawmakers go home and talk to their constituents and have other issues on their mind at home and when they come back there is a little less of this deep resistance that we hear right now from republicans maybe that softens over the recess. Its hard to tell exactly right now but they probably will be in a slightly different frame of mind and where they are this moment. Host thank you for laying it out for us this morning. What do you think . Buffalo, new york, you support the deal, tell us why . Caller i support whatever the president does because he is our president and we should all respect and listen close to what our president says. Host so you give him deference because of his office . Caller because of his decisionmaking, i think he is an intelligent man and i think is america he has americas best interest at heart. Host houston, texas, you oppose, why question mark caller its because people are saying, like the president said, he will veto it. How can you say that when you have so many people opposed to it . All the people i have listened to i trust what they say. They say its a bad deal. I dont believe the president is thinking of the best interest of the United States of america. Thats my thought. Host you said everyone youre listening to, who are you listening to . Caller yesterday, i listened to there were 10 democrats, 10 republicans on national tv yesterday on cspan. The ones that are saying it are saying it is not a good deal because of all the things that we are giving back to these people. Right as we say this, an agreement is made and they are hollowing they are hollering in the background to kill americans. What is the purpose here . Why would we make a deal with someone who hates america . Host the president says this is a way to expose iran to western ideas, democracy and have the iranian people see more of the outside world and the way you cannot deal with a country and make them change if they are contained in isolated, that this is an opening. Now that youve got the Nuclear Weapon issue of the table, you have room now and a connection to do with iran. Host i understand all that. Are we going to be able to stop them from making a nuclear bomb to kill us . They will suffer from this if the bomb threat is continued. Host take a look at usa today people say that this now stalls a breakout period, the time in which they can get to a Nuclear Weapon. It will take them 23 months right now but under this agreement, it would take them one year. Woodbridge virginia, democrat, you support . Caller i support the president because like the gentleman said, he is our president. The point is, war is not the answer to everything. We make peace with their enemies. We dont make peace with someone we love. You make peace with your enemies. We went in there and took out Saddam Hussein and look what happened . Look what happened in libya. They wanted us to go into syria and take assad out . Host what do you say to people who say iran has always cheated and they will continue to cheat and you cannot trust them . Caller yes, you can trust them. Thats why we have the monitors over there. We have to be there 24 7 and monitor them. We cannot let them get away with it. Once you put the pen to the paper, they signed for it, everything is on the table. They cannot decide to back away from it. The whole world will support the United States on this. Right now, lets go for peace. Host mississippi, are you opposed . Caller yes, maam. Host you are on the air. Caller yes maam. Host go ahead. Caller i oppose it because we never should have went over there and started talking peace with them to begin with. All obama done is let them have everything open it wide open, and who knows if they dont already have Nuclear Capabilities . Like they said, china russia, they will be standing on their heels to get over there themselves with all kind of weapons. They can buy them because we will let it go back to them. We shouldve left alone left it alone. Like everything he does, he goes to our enemies and tries to make these make peace and we dont get nothing. Host ok, chicago, you support the president . Caller good morning, yes, i do. My message to congress is i hope they have the moral courage and decency to support this agreement and not oppose it just because president obamas name is attached to it. I saw last night coverage of the iranian people take to the streets in celebration after the deal was signed. They were raising up the american lack, not burning it and they were chanting death to no one, long live life. That is a take step in our relationship with iran. It is only a beginning step and it should go much further. We should have peaceful relations with iran. Host take a look at the front page of the Washington Times that with the dateline on the screen from the iranian people as the president was speaking. What are your thoughts on this . What is your message for congress but to mark they have two months to review this deal to either supported or opposed this and want to know what your message to congress is on this. Take a look at what harry reid had to say [video clip] the document is 100 pages long and my staff is not read it and i have not read it and i talked to the president last night and i think what i will do and i recommend this to all senators, lets look at what we have. I have a broad outline of the agreement i want to find out what will transpire at the hearings. The republicans said they will hold these hearings and we will have briefings in the white house that will be extensive. I will wait and see. Host one of those hearings will be taking place before the Senate Foreign relations committee. The Foreign RelationsCommittee Chairman is bob corker, republican of tennessee, and he, yesterday, came before the cameras and had this to say. [video clip] i would say the agreement has taken a downward trend. The arms and bargo issue, the conventional arms embargo will be lifted in five years missile defense, Missile Development in eight years, we will have the issue of anytime, anywhere is not that way. There are number 60 days, we are going to go through this in great detail. We will have a awful and deliberate process. Might guess based on timing as we will have hearings in the next two or three weeks and likely, what we will do is vote on this when we return from recess. I am very skeptical but i want to go for the process and make sure we fully understand what it is we are voting on. Those who believe that this truly is going to keep iran from getting a Nuclear Weapon will vote for it. Those who believe that that is not the case and the world is not going to be safer and in some ways it may pave the way for them to get a Nuclear Weapon, will vote against it. That is our responsibility i look forward to carrying out those responsibilities with other members of the senate and the house. Host the chairman of the Foreign Relations committee laying it out for congress. They have 60 days now to look it over and he said they will probably vote on this when they return from their august recess. We are asking you to send a message to congress on this. Do you support it or oppose the nuclear deal . This is the whip list. There are for sure five yeses from the democrats in the senate and those are the names. There are 11 democrats leaning yes. Youve got one democrat who has said no and that is robert menendez, the former ranking democrat of the Foreign Relations committee. He had to step down under an ethics investigation. These are the undecided democrats, 29 of them. There are 21 republicans saying no and they think its a bad deal. You also heard from the 2016 gop contenders saying the same thing yesterday. You do have some republicans leaning no what is your message to your members of congress on this . Owings mills, maryland democrat, do you support it . You are on the air. I will give you one more chance. Danny in frankfurt connecticut you oppose, good morning. Are you there . Whats going on here . Lets move on to rich in south end, indiana. You support it as a democrat . Caller good morning, the alternative is war. How many body bags do you want coming home from iran . That is the alternative is war. Host why the you say that the alternative . What about the economic sentience sanctions . Caller it didnt work. When bush became president , they had a handful of sub of centrifuges. Now they have 50,000 . You have verifiable treaty or you have a war. Does the American Public want a fourth war in the middle east in the past 25 years . That is the alternative. Host all right, the number of centrifuges is from the Washington Post. We will hear from joyce next in kokomo, indiana, you opposed this, good morning. Caller good morning, i dont believe we should make a deal with them. They cannot be trusted. Its the same as its always been. They support terrorism and i dont think its a good deal. I dont think its good for our country and its not good for. Israel host joel in texas, you support it, why is that . Caller i supportive because im tired of seeing our American Kids dying over there. Theres people who dont want to fight for their country. You have these republicans running for office, none of them have ever been in the military none of them. Im a vietnam veteran and their children have not thought. You look at walker, hes got lots of children. You look at bush, hes got all his children. Why arent they fighting for this country . Its pretty pathetic to watch them out there and having the war drums eating and supports of these kind of wars. What is the other option . War . Im tired of it and im 74 years old. Ive never seen a time in my life when there is no war thats pretty pathetic you to be 74 years old and think act from the Second World War and waking up at night and seeing my house mom from nightmares, i can still visualize it. To see these people every year with war, you cannot tell me a time there was not a war. That is pathetic and none of these people will die for our country. Im tired of protecting the trump towers and is rich in powerful people that are not willing to give up their lives. Thats what so pathetic. This is the best deal you will get and if you want to blow the place up number you will see the iranis stream into iraq. You will see an outbreak of war there that you cannot imagine. Who will fight it . The working poor. Give me a break. Its pretty pathetic in iraq that we could not get enough people to join the military. We had to pay 10,000 bonuses to these kids. I want to know how many of these kids are over there. How many of those kids have their legs and arms blown off . This is how pathetic the Republican Party is. Host ken in alexandria virginia, good morning. Caller i am for peace. We teach our children to turn away and turn the other cheek and not. Fight there is absolutely no interest except private interest in congress when it comes to war. It is appalling they would not give the president the support that he needs to open up our hands and peace. They are human beings, too. All the middle east stuff we lose more people here every year to murder and violence by our own hand and we ever have to a terrorist or middle eastern group. I wholeheartedly support piece and anybody thats against peace just want war. Thats unfortunate. Host we want to get your take on the nuclear deal and what your messages to congress. Should they support or oppose it . They have two months ago over and we will talk with two members of congress coming up about this. We will begin with errol issa, republican of california who sits on the Foreign Affairs subcommittee on the middle east and north africa and then we will go to the senate side and talk to maryland democrat senator ben cardin who is the top democrat on the Foreign Relations committee in that chamber. We will get two different perspectives and take your comments and questions on this this morning. We will continue here with your message to congress. Do you support . Or do you oppose . Here are two different takes. We will begin with the globe and mail then you have this also in your newspaper this morning, the miami herald president obama is now on a Public Relations blitz to unite republicans on capitol hill and will call lawmakers and continue to do so himself personally. He will send his team as well up there, secretary of state champ john kerry and Energy Secretary are expected to go to capitol hill in the next few days and fill in the blanks for members of congress while they continue to read this more than 100 pages of a nuclear deal. Christine in texas, independent, you oppose . Tell us why. Caller yes, like you just mentioned, having the ability to go in and inspect if they feel they see something thats not right they might suspect that there is something being done that should not be done. Well, in the deal, as i understood it, listening to the committee that was speaking on it earlier in the program there is too much red tape. By the time the inspectors would go through the paperwork of them opposing and all this nonsense, they would have ample time to go ahead and hide or make it disappear if they were doing something that was against the agreement. That is one thing that needs to be looked at. I am not sure what the whole deal is but from what i gathered watching your program of the committee speaking with the ambassador and a couple of other gentleman asking questions about what was in the deal, there were a couple of things that need to be tweaked and have to be cleared. Also, lifting the sanctions and allowing the money to flow back into that country it finances terrorists. There is no question about that. Its ridiculous and not and thats another point not to address in the Government Department that deals with killing americans and suppressing their own and making them the under their regime that has to be addressed. There are other aspects that were not addressed that have to be addressed. It opened the door for us americans to have a conversation or get you an agreement. It does open the door and thank goodness for that. But the deal has to be tweaked. Host lets talk about economic viability for iran. Take a look at the Washington Post bake go through what each leader wanted and what they got. The paper this morning is talking about irans oil and what that will do to the oil market. Here is usa today take a look at the wall street journal many people believe the iranian people, especially the unemployed will welcome this and hope for a Better Future there. The Financial Times says it will take a while for the newspaper this morning for iran to see economic prosperi