vimarsana.com
Home
Live Updates
Transcripts For CSPAN Washington Journal Issie Lapowsky Disc
Transcripts For CSPAN Washington Journal Issie Lapowsky Disc
CSPAN Washington Journal Issie Lapowsky Discusses Russian-Linked Facebook Ads September 21, 2017
On cspan 2s book tv. She is here to talk about political as on facebook that are linked to russia. Good morning to you. Could you remind our viewers how we got to this story concerning facebook and potential ties to russia . Absolutely. There have been tons of questions circulating around possible twice possible ties between president trumps campaigns digital team. Sophisticated operations out of san antonio and there have been lots of questions whether any of the targeting of americans that russians did came from that team. Simultaneously, as you look into what the campaign was doing, you have to look into what the social media platforms were selling. All of there influence happens. Facebook has been undergoing its own investigation, looking into whether any as for purchase. Twitter has been doing the same thing. Facebooks investigation turned up about 150,000 worth of ads that it could directly linked to russian accounts. A0 accounts were linked to troll farm in russia. This monday and i spreading propaganda on the internet. This company is called
Internet Research
agency. Toy kind of those accounts that agency. Then they found another 2000 at or so linked to russian language addresses. Rican ip addresses inip the u. S. Over using the russian language. Now the question is if the ads are the whole story or visit of the iceberg. Theyre turning this over to
Robert Mueller
as he looks and all of this and that will be no doubt the question he is asking. Host our guest is available to talk to you and answer questions about this story. The russian role. Talk about the nature of these ads. What did people see . Guest facebook has been incredibly secretive about what these really entails. Theyr they only revealed cut across the ideological spectrum, meaning they were not as early affiliated with the left or right, but they touched. N hot button social issues things like immigration, lgbt rights. That is what we know so far and that is what is infuriating a lot of people. Facebook is being secretive about this. We do not know what the ads contain, we do not know how many people they reached, and we do not know how facebook went about finding these ads. Found you know how they to the at, you do not know what they might be missing. What wasould be the initial response from facebook . H a forthcoming are slow were they forthcoming or slow . Guest shortly after the election, a lot of fingers were being pointed facebooks direction, thinking fake news plays a massive role in electing president trump. Mark zuckerberg said it was naive to think that fake news could have had that much of an influence in the election and he said they revealed a lack of empathy on behalf of people who made that argument. A result of aas groundswell of support for president trump. Since then, facebook realized there was a fake news problem. It took steps using technology to try to detect fake accounts. It underwent an internal investigation to see if they made money on this. Now, they came forward with this 150,000 in ads. I would say they are not incredibly forthcoming about it they turned over ads and information about the accounts that purchased the ads to special investigator moeller muellers team. They havent had time to interrogate what a container how facebook found them. Congress would very much like to see facebook come forward and be hearing. In an open it is unclear whether facebook is going to do that. Last night, we reported twitter is going to be with
Congress Next
wednesday. Maybe there will be a little fear pressure. Host it seems like they are getting ahead of this issue and changes in store for the social
Media Companies
to engage in this type of practice. This it is clear after election that social
Media Companies
have to come up with a better game plan. People are terrified this will repeat itself if the companies do not come up with more sophisticated ways to learn who is buying out on their platform and figure out whether the people spreading news on their platform are really who they are saying they are. Companies come up with waste of cash that actors, it is very much true that they will come up with ways to pass the system. Colin on the numbers on your screen. In on the numbers on your screen. Dave is there on the democrats line. Caller thanks. I want to go back to during the iraq war when george bush was against al jazeera. Big criminal organization. That is a worldclass
News Organization
. Fastforward. Which idia believe it is owned by six different corporations so when you get an outside
News Organization
that contradicts anything the
United States
wants from the term
Hillary Clinton
coined, fake news, right . Who decides what is fake news and what is propaganda . I get a lot of my information from russian times. Host we will let our guest response. A point think that if well taken. The internet has made it so easy for anyone to their own
News Organization
, and for a long time that was the promise of the internet. A place where there were no gatekeepers. Anybody can have their message. E heard i think we want to be respectful of that and i think the platforms are conscious of that. Air on the side of we do not want to be the decisionmakers to what people are and are not allowed to date. Obviously, there has to be limits to that. There cannot be a system where facebook becomes this huge
News Organization
where
Many Americans
get their news every day. You cannot have it become a place where nobody knows what is true and what is not true anymore when you can create a website in a day and fill it with fake news and make it look just as legitimate as the new york times, it becomes harder for facebook users to know if what they are reading is true. I think you are right. There needs to be newcomers in the industry and for contradictory points of view, but there also needs to be some parameters. There needs to be some oversight and monitoring at facebook and these
Tech Companies
to ensure they are not filling their minds with users information that is false. Caller ive a question. People are so concerned about others trying to influence the like facebook. Facebook is a minority when it comes to
Younger Voters
who didnt vote. Concerned about people tried to influence the election, why arent you taking a look at our network news and the things that were coming out that were false news from the americans . Not from russia, but from the americans. I dont understand that. Youre putting emphasis on the russians were the americans had much more influence on what was happening with the election and it was fake news too. Guest i think when you find is that a lot of these influence efforts began on social media and for instance, they would have a network of fake accounts on twitter all share the same i dentical language with a hashtag. Starts tothe hashtag trends. Journalists are on twitter to get leads and they see it trending. Suddenly, you have a russian effort to influence the news really influencing the news. You are right. There are instances where
American Media
follows the wrong leads and get the story and gets the story wrong. We have to be conscious about where the information was coming from. The endot just blame up at, you have to look the entire look at the entire chain of where the information is coming from. I want to see if you can put into context the 150,000 out of the total revenue facebook generates from advertising. Dropcertainly is the tiny that strikes me as a tiny drop. Last year, facebook raised 27 million in advertising revenue during the question is whether that is all of all there was. That is why facebook turned over the ads and information about the accounts to
Robert Mueller
s team to look into what else there was. We do know is this group,
Internet Research
agency, technically shut down in december. Guess what. Theres another
Company Running
out of the same office with the same staff that started up around that same time. We do not know how many
Shell Companies
grew out of this company that shut down. We do not know how many more of werehell companies there or how many were operating in the u. S. With the dark money system to funnel money into these acts. There are so many unanswered questions. You are absolutely right. That is a problem. That influenced dozens of people on facebook, but it is a tiny version of the money that facebook raises through advertising. Host there is a blurb saying the chief operating officer of
Facebook Says
it will make reviews of its selfservice advertising system more manual. Could you explain what that means . Is it a more automated process now . Issue. That is a separate it is important to separate these out. There is the issue of the russian ads that facebook identified, but
Sheryl Sandberg
was responding to a different issue, where a
News Organization
discovered that you could purchase ads on facebook and target them at antisomatic categories of users, people who had reported that their fields jewory was
Something Like
hater. Obviously, facebook wanted nothing to do with that. But another company was able to buy them in a matter of 15 minutes. When facebook found that out, it stopped allowing the reason it was allowed to happen was because of facebook algorithms thats great information on the user pages. Into groups of users and categories they could try to target. Facebook stopped doing that. Was no longert scraping this information that users were self reporting. Its stopped doing that temporarily. Cleanhey say they can that process up but they are adding in an extra layer fo human moeration. Moderation. Any human being will see that there is no place for that category unfazed look, civil leave it will catch more abuses of the system. They say they are also working on a system where they are asking people to selfreport issues they with their advertising toll and potential abuses they see. Host why havent we heard from
Mark Zuckerberg
on this issue . Guest we heard a lot. We heard after the election that we thought the issue of fake news was overblown. Chimese heard that she and regularly on the election. I would say he hasnt said very much about this issue of the antisemitic as the russian linked ads. That has been left to spokespeople and what information they have shared has been limited and shared with
Robert Mueller
s team. Host if the investigators
Holding Hearing
on this issue, do we suspect they will call up
Mark Zuckerberg
or
Sheryl Sandberg
to testify . Guest they certainly want to. Their meeting with twitter next week. Just yesterday, senator mark orner, who is a vice chair on the senate intel committee, said they would very much like to meet with facebook. I was asking facebook every day if they are taking them up on the offer and the answer is no. I do not know what facebooks idea is right now. It looks like their best interest would be to be as transparent as possible not just for them but for the rest of us who may or may not have been targeted by a foreign actor. Hi. Er time cspan fan. Listen to for years before i stepped into the office. Cspan big social media outlet. A huge number of foreign accidents calling and during the election times. Is really suspects of all these immigrants whose as worded who supported trump great i was wondering if there is anyway cspan can look back at its records. I noticed today you could identify where i was calling from, which was a first. Anyhow, i think cspan was used as well. Host you have any questions for our guest regarding facebooks use . , canr only more generally you consider all social media and even include cspan in your research . Host ok. Host independent line. This is kelly. Caller thank you for taking my call. One of the things that i noticed. New book tons one of the things i am personally offended by since i it a trump supporter is seems to me half of america is saying the people who voted for trump were ignorant, dumb. We had no way somehow russia got into our mind and influenced us. The time tor took shouldnt have had that server. Of course we suspect
Foreign Government
to try to do stuff like this in our election. The problem that i have with that is we do it to other peoples elections but when you all act like russia came in and ped have a million people, it is wrong. I dont remember barack obama, lary wins in, none of them
Hillary Clinton
, none of them ringing the bells that this was going on. I guarantee you that if hillary would have one, this russia thing would have gone away in a heartbeat. Host let me take a point as far as measuring the potential impact from these ads re. I suspect that is what people want to know at the end of the day. Sure no want to make one misunderstand. I dont think anybody believes people are dumb for believing the news they are reading on a daily basis. This is not a problem that exclusively impacted trump voters. This is a problem that affected all of us. Withoutpossible to know doing extra
Research Weather
when you are reading is true. Rpoblem because a problem because the news is how we decide we want to support for a candidate. I think it is measurable home and people were targeted by these that the russians bought. Facebook has been tightlipped about those measurements. It is impossible to know whether because you were targeted you ire influenced by the ad, but think this massive
Advertising Industry
we felt in the country and the fact that the internet is built on a model of hints at the fact decision important makers do have influence. T what if you looking for what if you looking for . What is he looking for . Guest do we looking at the have ties to anyone in trumps circle or if they have content anywhere else that might lead to a new breadcrumb. Me i think you will encourage facebook to continue its digging. I think his questions are endless and i think he will also be interested in looking at president trumps own digital team. A lot of questions that surfaced about whether in order for russians to target americans they would have had to have help from the trump team. I personally dont think that is necessary because facebook offers one million ways to target users, but certainly, s team will be interested to see if there was any help from within the states. Host jeffrey from auburn, new york. Caller good morning, pedro. I like to suggest people who are decision, this especially the democrats what political activism, i am a lowtech, no tech person. I do not even have internet. How about boycotting facebook. Resign from your membership. Use other systems. How about calling people on the phone . Talk to people in person. Share your photos in other ways. Pastnk boycotts in the have been successful. If facebook were to suddenly use half of its membership they would change their ways and i personally boycott fox news. I find the dent toward conservatives orders on propaganda. Listen toefer to cspan, pbs, and other
News Organization
s to get factual news that is not slanted toward conservatives in america. Host we will let our guest response. Guest i think that is a perfectly respectable idea and youre not the first one to want to boycott these problems. That is certainly what their concerns about and what they want to clean up these messes as fast as possible. I also want to say it is not so easy to pull 2 billion people off of his book. These companies facebook. These companies are deeply ingrained in our lives. A little bit of luxury. Similaras paid influence. During the election, there was evidence of this group of fake news sites that sprung up in macedonia was making money off of their fake news by placing google out on their website. Pretty hard to disentangle youle from your life unless have a catalog of encyclopedias. I think a lot of the country and world have moved in the direction where you are so dependent on these platforms that it becomes harder and harder to boycott on a moral stance. Host larry is next from pleasant view, tennessee. Caller good morning to your guest. I was wondering if anyone made the connection with trumps attempt to get complete voter rolls. Could you address that please . Guest i dont know if there is a direct time. I think they are related to the claims that millions of country voted illegally. There is not much evidence that actually happens. I believe
Voting Commission
is trying to prove the president s point. Rolls is is the voter an antiquated system. I think they will find lots of duplicate listings of voters, maybe in different states or counties, because people move and forget to reregister. That doesnt necessarily indicate there was fraudulent voting going on. I want to vote up to the point of how russians might have been able to target americans in the election, what a lot of people dont know is that voter rolls are publicly available or they are purchasable by somebody who resides inside that states. They do not provide as much detail as campaign tax because abs, but they at least have and your and address political affiliation and whether or not you voted in the past. There is a theory that if russians really wanted to do specific targeting of americans they could go out and purchase and clean up those voter rolls, just like any campaign within the u. S. Host what are you looking for the future as far as this issue is concerned . What are you paying attention to as far as the action of this book facebook . Guest i am looking for more answers. I ask, how did you reach this conclusion . Know if impossible to the search is ever over. It is almost impossible to know if the search is ever over. I think they can call and some help here. I would require something that facebook has never been comfortable with and that is transparency about how it system works. Looking for more transparency from facebook in all of these platforms. It has been pretty reticent about what it is willing to say publicly. I am looking for more answers and transparency from all these companies. Host
Internet Research<\/a> agency. Toy kind of those accounts that agency. Then they found another 2000 at or so linked to russian language addresses. Rican ip addresses inip the u. S. Over using the russian language. Now the question is if the ads are the whole story or visit of the iceberg. Theyre turning this over to
Robert Mueller<\/a> as he looks and all of this and that will be no doubt the question he is asking. Host our guest is available to talk to you and answer questions about this story. The russian role. Talk about the nature of these ads. What did people see . Guest facebook has been incredibly secretive about what these really entails. Theyr they only revealed cut across the ideological spectrum, meaning they were not as early affiliated with the left or right, but they touched. N hot button social issues things like immigration, lgbt rights. That is what we know so far and that is what is infuriating a lot of people. Facebook is being secretive about this. We do not know what the ads contain, we do not know how many people they reached, and we do not know how facebook went about finding these ads. Found you know how they to the at, you do not know what they might be missing. What wasould be the initial response from facebook . H a forthcoming are slow were they forthcoming or slow . Guest shortly after the election, a lot of fingers were being pointed facebooks direction, thinking fake news plays a massive role in electing president trump. Mark zuckerberg said it was naive to think that fake news could have had that much of an influence in the election and he said they revealed a lack of empathy on behalf of people who made that argument. A result of aas groundswell of support for president trump. Since then, facebook realized there was a fake news problem. It took steps using technology to try to detect fake accounts. It underwent an internal investigation to see if they made money on this. Now, they came forward with this 150,000 in ads. I would say they are not incredibly forthcoming about it they turned over ads and information about the accounts that purchased the ads to special investigator moeller muellers team. They havent had time to interrogate what a container how facebook found them. Congress would very much like to see facebook come forward and be hearing. In an open it is unclear whether facebook is going to do that. Last night, we reported twitter is going to be with
Congress Next<\/a> wednesday. Maybe there will be a little fear pressure. Host it seems like they are getting ahead of this issue and changes in store for the social
Media Companies<\/a> to engage in this type of practice. This it is clear after election that social
Media Companies<\/a> have to come up with a better game plan. People are terrified this will repeat itself if the companies do not come up with more sophisticated ways to learn who is buying out on their platform and figure out whether the people spreading news on their platform are really who they are saying they are. Companies come up with waste of cash that actors, it is very much true that they will come up with ways to pass the system. Colin on the numbers on your screen. In on the numbers on your screen. Dave is there on the democrats line. Caller thanks. I want to go back to during the iraq war when george bush was against al jazeera. Big criminal organization. That is a worldclass
News Organization<\/a>. Fastforward. Which idia believe it is owned by six different corporations so when you get an outside
News Organization<\/a> that contradicts anything the
United States<\/a> wants from the term
Hillary Clinton<\/a> coined, fake news, right . Who decides what is fake news and what is propaganda . I get a lot of my information from russian times. Host we will let our guest response. A point think that if well taken. The internet has made it so easy for anyone to their own
News Organization<\/a>, and for a long time that was the promise of the internet. A place where there were no gatekeepers. Anybody can have their message. E heard i think we want to be respectful of that and i think the platforms are conscious of that. Air on the side of we do not want to be the decisionmakers to what people are and are not allowed to date. Obviously, there has to be limits to that. There cannot be a system where facebook becomes this huge
News Organization<\/a> where
Many Americans<\/a> get their news every day. You cannot have it become a place where nobody knows what is true and what is not true anymore when you can create a website in a day and fill it with fake news and make it look just as legitimate as the new york times, it becomes harder for facebook users to know if what they are reading is true. I think you are right. There needs to be newcomers in the industry and for contradictory points of view, but there also needs to be some parameters. There needs to be some oversight and monitoring at facebook and these
Tech Companies<\/a> to ensure they are not filling their minds with users information that is false. Caller ive a question. People are so concerned about others trying to influence the like facebook. Facebook is a minority when it comes to
Younger Voters<\/a> who didnt vote. Concerned about people tried to influence the election, why arent you taking a look at our network news and the things that were coming out that were false news from the americans . Not from russia, but from the americans. I dont understand that. Youre putting emphasis on the russians were the americans had much more influence on what was happening with the election and it was fake news too. Guest i think when you find is that a lot of these influence efforts began on social media and for instance, they would have a network of fake accounts on twitter all share the same i dentical language with a hashtag. Starts tothe hashtag trends. Journalists are on twitter to get leads and they see it trending. Suddenly, you have a russian effort to influence the news really influencing the news. You are right. There are instances where
American Media<\/a> follows the wrong leads and get the story and gets the story wrong. We have to be conscious about where the information was coming from. The endot just blame up at, you have to look the entire look at the entire chain of where the information is coming from. I want to see if you can put into context the 150,000 out of the total revenue facebook generates from advertising. Dropcertainly is the tiny that strikes me as a tiny drop. Last year, facebook raised 27 million in advertising revenue during the question is whether that is all of all there was. That is why facebook turned over the ads and information about the accounts to
Robert Mueller<\/a>s team to look into what else there was. We do know is this group,
Internet Research<\/a> agency, technically shut down in december. Guess what. Theres another
Company Running<\/a> out of the same office with the same staff that started up around that same time. We do not know how many
Shell Companies<\/a> grew out of this company that shut down. We do not know how many more of werehell companies there or how many were operating in the u. S. With the dark money system to funnel money into these acts. There are so many unanswered questions. You are absolutely right. That is a problem. That influenced dozens of people on facebook, but it is a tiny version of the money that facebook raises through advertising. Host there is a blurb saying the chief operating officer of
Facebook Says<\/a> it will make reviews of its selfservice advertising system more manual. Could you explain what that means . Is it a more automated process now . Issue. That is a separate it is important to separate these out. There is the issue of the russian ads that facebook identified, but
Sheryl Sandberg<\/a> was responding to a different issue, where a
News Organization<\/a> discovered that you could purchase ads on facebook and target them at antisomatic categories of users, people who had reported that their fields jewory was
Something Like<\/a> hater. Obviously, facebook wanted nothing to do with that. But another company was able to buy them in a matter of 15 minutes. When facebook found that out, it stopped allowing the reason it was allowed to happen was because of facebook algorithms thats great information on the user pages. Into groups of users and categories they could try to target. Facebook stopped doing that. Was no longert scraping this information that users were self reporting. Its stopped doing that temporarily. Cleanhey say they can that process up but they are adding in an extra layer fo human moeration. Moderation. Any human being will see that there is no place for that category unfazed look, civil leave it will catch more abuses of the system. They say they are also working on a system where they are asking people to selfreport issues they with their advertising toll and potential abuses they see. Host why havent we heard from
Mark Zuckerberg<\/a> on this issue . Guest we heard a lot. We heard after the election that we thought the issue of fake news was overblown. Chimese heard that she and regularly on the election. I would say he hasnt said very much about this issue of the antisemitic as the russian linked ads. That has been left to spokespeople and what information they have shared has been limited and shared with
Robert Mueller<\/a>s team. Host if the investigators
Holding Hearing<\/a> on this issue, do we suspect they will call up
Mark Zuckerberg<\/a> or
Sheryl Sandberg<\/a> to testify . Guest they certainly want to. Their meeting with twitter next week. Just yesterday, senator mark orner, who is a vice chair on the senate intel committee, said they would very much like to meet with facebook. I was asking facebook every day if they are taking them up on the offer and the answer is no. I do not know what facebooks idea is right now. It looks like their best interest would be to be as transparent as possible not just for them but for the rest of us who may or may not have been targeted by a foreign actor. Hi. Er time cspan fan. Listen to for years before i stepped into the office. Cspan big social media outlet. A huge number of foreign accidents calling and during the election times. Is really suspects of all these immigrants whose as worded who supported trump great i was wondering if there is anyway cspan can look back at its records. I noticed today you could identify where i was calling from, which was a first. Anyhow, i think cspan was used as well. Host you have any questions for our guest regarding facebooks use . , canr only more generally you consider all social media and even include cspan in your research . Host ok. Host independent line. This is kelly. Caller thank you for taking my call. One of the things that i noticed. New book tons one of the things i am personally offended by since i it a trump supporter is seems to me half of america is saying the people who voted for trump were ignorant, dumb. We had no way somehow russia got into our mind and influenced us. The time tor took shouldnt have had that server. Of course we suspect
Foreign Government<\/a> to try to do stuff like this in our election. The problem that i have with that is we do it to other peoples elections but when you all act like russia came in and ped have a million people, it is wrong. I dont remember barack obama, lary wins in, none of them
Hillary Clinton<\/a>, none of them ringing the bells that this was going on. I guarantee you that if hillary would have one, this russia thing would have gone away in a heartbeat. Host let me take a point as far as measuring the potential impact from these ads re. I suspect that is what people want to know at the end of the day. Sure no want to make one misunderstand. I dont think anybody believes people are dumb for believing the news they are reading on a daily basis. This is not a problem that exclusively impacted trump voters. This is a problem that affected all of us. Withoutpossible to know doing extra
Research Weather<\/a> when you are reading is true. Rpoblem because a problem because the news is how we decide we want to support for a candidate. I think it is measurable home and people were targeted by these that the russians bought. Facebook has been tightlipped about those measurements. It is impossible to know whether because you were targeted you ire influenced by the ad, but think this massive
Advertising Industry<\/a> we felt in the country and the fact that the internet is built on a model of hints at the fact decision important makers do have influence. T what if you looking for what if you looking for . What is he looking for . Guest do we looking at the have ties to anyone in trumps circle or if they have content anywhere else that might lead to a new breadcrumb. Me i think you will encourage facebook to continue its digging. I think his questions are endless and i think he will also be interested in looking at president trumps own digital team. A lot of questions that surfaced about whether in order for russians to target americans they would have had to have help from the trump team. I personally dont think that is necessary because facebook offers one million ways to target users, but certainly, s team will be interested to see if there was any help from within the states. Host jeffrey from auburn, new york. Caller good morning, pedro. I like to suggest people who are decision, this especially the democrats what political activism, i am a lowtech, no tech person. I do not even have internet. How about boycotting facebook. Resign from your membership. Use other systems. How about calling people on the phone . Talk to people in person. Share your photos in other ways. Pastnk boycotts in the have been successful. If facebook were to suddenly use half of its membership they would change their ways and i personally boycott fox news. I find the dent toward conservatives orders on propaganda. Listen toefer to cspan, pbs, and other
News Organization<\/a>s to get factual news that is not slanted toward conservatives in america. Host we will let our guest response. Guest i think that is a perfectly respectable idea and youre not the first one to want to boycott these problems. That is certainly what their concerns about and what they want to clean up these messes as fast as possible. I also want to say it is not so easy to pull 2 billion people off of his book. These companies facebook. These companies are deeply ingrained in our lives. A little bit of luxury. Similaras paid influence. During the election, there was evidence of this group of fake news sites that sprung up in macedonia was making money off of their fake news by placing google out on their website. Pretty hard to disentangle youle from your life unless have a catalog of encyclopedias. I think a lot of the country and world have moved in the direction where you are so dependent on these platforms that it becomes harder and harder to boycott on a moral stance. Host larry is next from pleasant view, tennessee. Caller good morning to your guest. I was wondering if anyone made the connection with trumps attempt to get complete voter rolls. Could you address that please . Guest i dont know if there is a direct time. I think they are related to the claims that millions of country voted illegally. There is not much evidence that actually happens. I believe
Voting Commission<\/a> is trying to prove the president s point. Rolls is is the voter an antiquated system. I think they will find lots of duplicate listings of voters, maybe in different states or counties, because people move and forget to reregister. That doesnt necessarily indicate there was fraudulent voting going on. I want to vote up to the point of how russians might have been able to target americans in the election, what a lot of people dont know is that voter rolls are publicly available or they are purchasable by somebody who resides inside that states. They do not provide as much detail as campaign tax because abs, but they at least have and your and address political affiliation and whether or not you voted in the past. There is a theory that if russians really wanted to do specific targeting of americans they could go out and purchase and clean up those voter rolls, just like any campaign within the u. S. Host what are you looking for the future as far as this issue is concerned . What are you paying attention to as far as the action of this book facebook . Guest i am looking for more answers. I ask, how did you reach this conclusion . Know if impossible to the search is ever over. It is almost impossible to know if the search is ever over. I think they can call and some help here. I would require something that facebook has never been comfortable with and that is transparency about how it system works. Looking for more transparency from facebook in all of these platforms. It has been pretty reticent about what it is willing to say publicly. I am looking for more answers and transparency from all these companies. Host
Senior Writer<\/a> for wired magazine. We thank you for your time today. [captions
Copyright National<\/a> cable satellite corp. 2017] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] would besaid they proposing additional sanctions on north korea. We will be hearing live from making the nikki haley. Starting shortly here on cspan. Live coverage from cspan new york city. We will be hearing soon from the u. N. Ssador to nikki haley about additional sanctions against north korea announced today by president trump. Later tonight, the
Senate Leaders<\/a> said they want to bring the new healthcare proposal to the floor next week for a vote. We will bring a close look at the legislation sponsored by louisiana centreville cassidy and south carolinas lindsey graham. Currentl change funding. We also review another proposal to change the current individual insurance market. You can see that tonight at 8 00 a. M. Turn here on sees and on cspan. Were waiting for nikki haleys comments on sanctions on north korea. U. S. Ambassador to the u. N. Onki haleys comments imposing sanctions to north korea. We will take you back here when her comments begin live on seat and. We heard about cs we heard about sanctions from secretarypan. Steve mnuchin. Well look at his remarks. Hello, everybody. Nice to see you. Glad to be her with all of you. Week. Productive","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"archive.org","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","width":"800","height":"600","url":"\/\/ia800404.us.archive.org\/21\/items\/CSPAN_20170921_200400_Washington_Journal_Issie_Lapowsky_Discusses_Russian-Linked_Facebook_Ads\/CSPAN_20170921_200400_Washington_Journal_Issie_Lapowsky_Discusses_Russian-Linked_Facebook_Ads.thumbs\/CSPAN_20170921_200400_Washington_Journal_Issie_Lapowsky_Discusses_Russian-Linked_Facebook_Ads_000001.jpg"}},"autauthor":{"@type":"Organization"},"author":{"sameAs":"archive.org","name":"archive.org"}}],"coverageEndTime":"20240629T12:35:10+00:00"}