unprofessional conduct to me. >> and he also said it was pusilanimous. your response. >> well, what he calls pussilanimous i would just call prudent. we handled this material with extreme care. we wanted to be careful not to put anything in the paper or anything on our website that would put lives at risk. now, as a rule, when we do a story that's based on some kind of a repository of data we link to the data. so we owed our readers some explanation of why we hadn't do that in this case, and we didn't do it because we really had no such assurance about the risks posed by the raw material that he put up. obviously, in this day and age -- you know, obviously, that doesn't prevent, you know, a curious observer from seeking out the wikileaks site on their own. but it was, you know, at least symbolically a way of