series of appeals and hope that he prevails. >> here's what it reads, carl. and the plaintiffs ask for it to be converted into a longer-term prelimary injunction and the guj agreed wednesday night. the court concludes that on the record before it, plaintiffs have met the burden of having established on theimators of the stabment clausz claim. what do you read into that? what does that mean? >> it means that those who want to see this policy halted have got a real argument in their favor based on the prior, quote, legislative history or the history of how this rule and travel ban came to be. if you remember how the president and the president of the united states and those around made statements