tab and the trade-off is to create a private sector market for people with normal insurance. to preserve normal insurance, take care of preexisting conditions through a government-run program, but as to the rest of the population not covered by government-run programs, gives them a chance to have more choices, not let. that's the trade-off i'm willing l willing to make, but we're stuck as a party. i would like a bipart is aen absolute. >> do you think the bill they're talking about now, the house and the amendment is better for folks with preexisting can thises or does less? >> the president says the bill contains protection for preexisting conditions. >> you have those who don't agree. >> i have no idea what's in the bill. i'm telling you you know as much as i do what's in the billing. wouldn't it be nice to have both parties and see if you can find a better way to preserve -- and bite the bullet on preexisting